PPRuNe Forums

Go Back   PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Forgotten your Username/Password?
Register FAQ Calendar Advertise Mark Forums Read

Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 7th November 2009, 13:24   #1 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: OMAA / AUH
Posts: 161
A/THR and AP disconnection sequence (Airbus FBW)

Hi,

I recently flew with someone who was very adamant about the correct sequence of disconnection of A/THR and AP: AP first then A/THR...without being able to quote any ref.

I have been doing the exact opposite sequence for years (i.e A/THR then AP) because I was told so during my T/R and because I think this is the most logical way to do it.

Does anyone have an official Airbus literature about this (FCOM, FCTM, Briefing notes, Bulletins...)? I couldn't find anything so far.

As far as you know, is hybrid flying (A/THR off, AP on) not recommanded by Airbus (in normal situation)? I usually disconnect the A/THR in very busy terminal area on final above 1000' and keep AP on until cleared to land.

Thanks for your input'
shortfuel is offline   Reply
Old 7th November 2009, 13:51   #2 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: London, England
Posts: 135
This was not recommended on the 737 due to large trim changes as the autothrottle chased the speed.

On FBW bus I know of no requirement to disconnect A/P or A/t in any order and manual flying with autothrust engaged is permitted.

I know of a large Uk airline who don't allow flying without autothrust (until the retard) unless there is a fault with it.
FatFlyer is offline   Reply
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes


Posting Rules
vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 20:36.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC7
© 1996-2009 The Professional Pilots Rumour Network

As these are anonymous forums the origins of the contributions may be opposite to what may be apparent. In fact the press may use it, or the unscrupulous, or sciolists*, to elicit certain reactions.

*"sciolist"... Noun, archaic. "a person who pretends to be knowledgeable and well informed".