PPRuNe Forums

Go Back   PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Forgotten your Username/Password?
Register FAQ Calendar Advertise Mark Forums Read

Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 30th June 2009, 13:53   #1 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: uk
Posts: 40
Trent 800-B777 cruise altitude

To all Trent 800-B777 drivers: Can any of you enlighten me on what the recommended Vs normal (if different) cruising altitude for the Trent 800-B777? What are the reasons behind the difference if any?

Thanks folks!
r304ndy is offline   Reply
Old 30th June 2009, 14:12   #2 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 317
Normally RCMND Crz Alt is pretty close to the Flight Levels planned for the route.

however sometimes winds can be different than forecast requiring an early climb/descent.
or entering NON RVSM airspace can require you to be significantly off your recommended crz alt as calculated by the FMC
Shaka Zulu is offline   Reply
Old 30th June 2009, 15:41   #3 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: uk
Posts: 40
Thanks Shaka Zulu. What I really would like to know is if the there are some Trent-specifically operating instructions which do not allow you cruise at or near recommended cruise altitude? Any TO derate restrictions perhaps?

Cheers!
r304ndy is offline   Reply
Old 30th June 2009, 16:03   #4 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Singapore
Posts: 1,685
There are no "Trent Specific" limitations upon cruising at or near recommended cruise altitude. The aerodynamic limitations regarding buffet margins apply as in all other aircraft. For the moment, Trent engines must have a Climb Thrust application within the last 2 hours of flight, due to the fuel iceing problems associated with the BA accident.

TO derate restrictions, or to be more specific, Takeoff Reduced Thrust restrictions, applied only to the GE 115 versions prior to modification. In our company (SIA) all GE engines are now modified, and no restrictions apply.

Regards,

Old Smokey
Old Smokey is offline   Reply
Old 4th July 2009, 07:50   #5 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: KUL
Posts: 211
reoandy,

The reason for the difference between the OPT ALT & RECMD ALT is the WIND (to a smaller extend, TEMP)! In NIL wind, OPT ALT & RECMD ALT will be the same. The difference maybe obtained from the WIND-ALTITUDE TRADE table in PI section of FCOM 1 (i still think Boeing should have left it in the QRH!).

Barring any ATC restriction, all flights shown be flown as close to the RECMD ALT as possible as it should be most economical (GIGO discounted!)

I know not of any restriction saying otherwise.

SR
SuperRanger is offline   Reply
Old 6th July 2009, 07:17   #6 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Suspension city
Posts: 7
SR I don't quite agree.

OPT alt, is the altitude that minimizes trip cost when ECON speed is selected.In other words, OPT displays the most economical altitude to fly, based on gross weight.When LRC or SEL SPD is selected, OPT alt displays the altitude that minimizes trip fuel.

RECMD alt is the recommended cruise flight level to fly at for the next 500 NM. This calculation is based on the following:
  • Specified route
  • Selected cruise speed schedule
  • Estimated aircraft drag and fuel flow information
  • Wind and temp forcast
The recommended flght level can be any flight level in the present step altitude schedule up to the maximum altitude ( MAX ALT) and down to 9000 ft below the current FMS cruise alt.

The big visual difference on the FMS is that OPT alt increases in 100 ft increments for obvious reasons.
RECMD alt is always a flight level based on selected step climb of either 4000 ft (ICAO) or 2000 ft (RVSM)

Laters
hotcurry is offline   Reply
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes


Posting Rules
vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:06.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC7
© 1996-2009 The Professional Pilots Rumour Network

As these are anonymous forums the origins of the contributions may be opposite to what may be apparent. In fact the press may use it, or the unscrupulous, or sciolists*, to elicit certain reactions.

*"sciolist"... Noun, archaic. "a person who pretends to be knowledgeable and well informed".