PPRuNe Forums

Go Back   PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Forgotten your Username/Password?
Register FAQ Calendar Advertise Mark Forums Read

Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 2nd July 2009, 22:57   #41 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Lost under the sea
Posts: 571
Does anybody have a copy of
"Airborne Weather Radar: A User's Guide by James C. Barr"?
tubby linton is offline   Reply
Old 3rd July 2009, 11:13   #42 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: USA
Posts: 265
Training! Training! Training!

Gentlemen:


If your airline was worth a XXXX, it would provide proper RADAR training. Mine did. We spent two days with....not a training department pilot....but, an avionics eingineer. This was done on initial (when you're first hired with the airline as part of the basic indoc).

While it's true, using the RADAR is an art that is learned from experience, you have to be taught the basics...including basic SOPs regarding use, limitations, caveats, etc.

As stated many times previously, Airbus has great documentation to give some of the basics and overview. I don't know if Boeing has similar.

If your airline's SOP is inadequate, it's time to talk to your buddy in the training department to get the company up to speed.

Fly safe,


PantLoad
PantLoad is offline   Reply
Old 3rd July 2009, 15:06   #43 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: SoCalif
Posts: 504
Just found this white paper on the Collins Multi-Scan radar, which has been around since 2002: http://www.rockwellcollins.com/ecat/.../WXR2100WP.pdf

It is instructive of the problem, and the solution.

GB
Graybeard is offline   Reply
Old 4th July 2009, 10:06   #44 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: east of 10° west
Age: 48
Posts: 62
it's a "White Paper"..

Greybeard, sorry, am extremely skeptical about that..

maybe someone in this forum already has experience with that equipment..

but having been exposed to a wide variety of WX radars, installed in different airplanes, i.e. different antenna sizes, different radomes etc etc..I'm veeery skeptical..

I do not really buy it that automation in this regard, as well meant as it may be by the designers, and as logically as it may be explained, will solve the known issues..

my point is, that there are just way too many variables in the equation, and that is by the nature of WX radar technology and the elements involved..

or simply said, knowing all the limits of WX radar, I would not feel comfortable to rely on more automated circuits in a radar installation..
falconer1 is offline   Reply
Old 4th July 2009, 13:21   #45 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: London
Posts: 22
Some of our airbuses have the autotilt function that adjust the tilt to get an optimum picture against clutter across the whole scan. I have to say, desite initial reservations, it does an impressive job and can provide a picture that I would struggle to achieve even with constant tilt adjustment.
320 driver is offline   Reply
Old 4th July 2009, 14:26   #46 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: SoCalif
Posts: 504
All DC-9 and larger planes can house a 29" flat plate antenna with about a 3 degree beam width. Smaller planes require a smaller antenna, meaning wider beam width and reduced precision of the return.

GB
Graybeard is offline   Reply
Old 15th August 2009, 22:21   #47 (permalink)
Probationary PPRuNer
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Texas
Posts: 1
Airborne Weather Radar

The video by Archie Trammell you mentioned is now available on DVD or CD Rom. He publishes a monthly website also with training tips and techniques. Check it out: radar4pilots.com
atrammell is offline   Reply
Old 20th August 2009, 04:52   #48 (permalink)
PPRuNe supporter
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Planet Earth
Posts: 1,270
Quote:
Some of our airbuses have the autotilt function that adjust the tilt to get an optimum picture against clutter across the whole scan. I have to say, desite initial reservations, it does an impressive job and can provide a picture that I would struggle to achieve even with constant tilt adjustment. by 320 driver
Have to agree, there was a bit of a learning curve involved, now when the other guy switches to manual and starts scanning around, I just give a sigh and ask that when he's done, please return to Auto, nuff said.
Dream Land is offline   Reply
Old 25th August 2009, 04:18   #49 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: USA
Posts: 265
Dream Land is right....

Actually, occasional change to manual mode is acceptable, but Airbus recommends exactly what Dream Land states.....returning to the auto mode afterward.

Personally, I use a combination of the two modes....I'm still not totally sold on the new dual-scan RADAR. But, please, don't throw rocks at me, I'm a slow learner.


Fly safe,


PantLoad
PantLoad is offline   Reply
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes


Posting Rules
vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 15:08.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC7
© 1996-2009 The Professional Pilots Rumour Network

As these are anonymous forums the origins of the contributions may be opposite to what may be apparent. In fact the press may use it, or the unscrupulous, or sciolists*, to elicit certain reactions.

*"sciolist"... Noun, archaic. "a person who pretends to be knowledgeable and well informed".