PPRuNe Forums

Go Back   PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Forgotten your Username/Password?


Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 21st May 2009, 21:54   #1 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: The New Forest, UK
Posts: 223
Engine startup order on the Propliners (DC3, DC4 etc)

Any one know the standard engine startup order used on the Propliners ( DC3, DC4, DC6)? I'm sure it wasn't a straight 1-2-3-4.

What about the startup order in modern 3 & 4 engine jets.
b377 is offline   Reply
Old 21st May 2009, 22:49   #2 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: MI
Posts: 569
Two-engine aircraft: 2, 1.

Four-engine aircraft: 3, 4, 2, 1.
DC-ATE is offline   Reply
Old 21st May 2009, 23:09   #3 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: CYZV
Age: 66
Posts: 1,098
Start the ones with the hydraulic pumps on 'em first.
pigboat is offline   Reply
Old 21st May 2009, 23:38   #4 (permalink)

 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: USA
Posts: 3,262
Which is started first depends on several things, including the configuration of the airplane (what pumps and accessories are on what engine, for example), and the operation involved (two engine taxi vs. four engine taxi, etc).

Generally I always started 1, 2, 3, and 4 in that order. In aircraft with inboard engines having hydraulic pumps, then inboards first, or alternating inboards first.

When taxiing on two engines, usually inboards only, and with short taxi's, then all four engines turning to warm up in the short taxi distance available.
SNS3Guppy is offline   Reply
Old 21st May 2009, 23:49   #5 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Petaluma
Posts: 329
Am I right in assuming DC-ATE's sequence has to do with pax-ops and a port loading and unloading format, at times with engines turning?
Will Fraser is offline   Reply
Old 22nd May 2009, 00:16   #6 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Europe
Posts: 707
FWIW the #2 (right hand) engine is always started first on the King Air, due to the wiring to the battery being shorter
bfisk is offline   Reply
Old 22nd May 2009, 00:21   #7 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Petaluma
Posts: 329
I remember that the critical engine is started first, no? In twins anyway.
Will Fraser is offline   Reply
Old 22nd May 2009, 00:26   #8 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: MI
Posts: 569
Will Fraser -
Quote:
Am I right in assuming DC-ATE's sequence has to do with pax-ops and a port loading and unloading format, at times with engines turning
Yes. And the sequence I gave was for 'Normal' ops. Obviously, there's always exceptions. I have NEVER seen a sequence of 1, 2, 3, 4, however, as someone stated, except the 'default' Flight Sim way, but I thought we were talking "real" here.
DC-ATE is offline   Reply
Old 22nd May 2009, 00:31   #9 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Petaluma
Posts: 329
Jetways are fairly "recent". A lot of excitable little boys and girls on the ramp at loading. The stairs were short steep and narrow. Best to keep the scimitars out of harm's way.
Will Fraser is offline   Reply
Old 22nd May 2009, 00:35   #10 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: USA
Posts: 8
Start order modern jets

On the 747-400 the start order is 3&4 simultaneously auto start, followed by 1&2 simultaneously auto start.

Dont know about the -200....if that is still considered a modern jet!!!!
kiwi1011fe is offline   Reply
Old 22nd May 2009, 00:42   #11 (permalink)

SkyGod
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Ft. Lauderdale, Florida, USA
Posts: 1,000
I thiught we started the -200 4-3-2-1...?

It has been 18 months since I flew one, memory is dropping fast
TowerDog is offline   Reply
Old 22nd May 2009, 00:58   #12 (permalink)

 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: USA
Posts: 3,262
Quote:
I remember that the critical engine is started first, no? In twins anyway.
There is no critical engine on the ground, and this has no bearing on the start order for the airplane.

The start order is sometimes varied in order to test engine-driven equipment, such as alternating engines to test hydraulic pumps, etc.

Quote:
I have NEVER seen a sequence of 1, 2, 3, 4, however, as someone stated, except the 'default' Flight Sim way, but I thought we were talking "real" here.
Standard starting order for us in four engine piston and turboprop, and turbojet equipment, was 1, 2, 3, 4. Yes, we are talking "real" here. No, simulators not involved.

However, as you brought it up, in the simulator we performed the same start sequence, same as on the line. 1, 2, 3, 4.
SNS3Guppy is offline   Reply
Old 22nd May 2009, 01:07   #13 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: West Coast Canada
Posts: 1,594
When I was on the DC 6 we started inboard,outboard (same side)inboard,outboard (other side). An inboard was always started first because that is where the hyd pumps are. The order could be 3,4,2,1 or 2,1,3,4 at the captains discretion. A factor was whether the captain started all engines or whether the captain started the right wing engines and the copilot started the left side engines (the better way IMO). In the later case the convention at my company was 3,4,2,1.
Big Pistons Forever is offline   Reply
Old 22nd May 2009, 01:12   #14 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: MI
Posts: 569
SNS3Guppy -
Quote:
Standard starting order for us in four engine piston and turboprop, and turbojet equipment, was 1, 2, 3, 4.
I'd be curious to know just what aircraft had that starting order. I flew the Connies, DC-6/7, and NEVER saw that order. But the initial question related to piston aircraft.

Last edited by DC-ATE; 22nd May 2009 at 12:22.
DC-ATE is offline   Reply
Old 22nd May 2009, 01:18   #15 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Arizona USA
Posts: 8,663
DC-6/7 types were normally started 3-4-2-1.
Hydraulic pumps on two and three.
In addition, and this could be quite important...in the event of a fire whilst starting, starting the inboard engine first on four engine types provided better access for the fire guard.

And...to anticipate the next question, if hydraulic pumps were on engines two and three, what accessory was driven by numbers one and four?
Among others...cabin superchargers (roots blowers).

And yes, I flew both types mentioned.
411A is offline   Reply
Old 22nd May 2009, 02:10   #16 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: CYZV
Age: 66
Posts: 1,098
Normal start sequence of both Gulfstream 1 and Fairchild/Fokker F-27 was 2 - 1, however both manufacturers recommended you occasionally start out of sequence to verify the operation of the de-icer boot suction.
pigboat is offline   Reply
Old 22nd May 2009, 04:28   #17 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Kerikeri, New Zealand or Noosa Queensland. Depending on the time of year!
Age: 73
Posts: 259
"Any one know the standard engine startup order used on the Propliners ( DC3, DC4, DC6)? I'm sure it wasn't a straight 1-2-3-4.

What about the startup order in modern 3 & 4 engine jets."

As you can see from the replies above there is no fixed sequence - it depends on your companies SOPs, as is often the case when you ask these kind of questions. When I flew DC3s it was number 2 engine first allowing the pax door to remain open until the last minute. (The traffic officer had to exit through that door) When I flew 747s it was 1234
Exaviator is offline   Reply
Old 22nd May 2009, 04:54   #18 (permalink)

 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: USA
Posts: 3,262
Quote:
I'd be curious to know just what aircraft had that starting order. I flew the Connies, DC-6/67, and NEVER saw that order. But the initial question related to piston aircraft.
Among others, the PB4Y-2...which we typically started 1, 2, 3, and 4. Sometimes just the inboards, sometimes all four, sometimes the inboards then the outboards, sometimes for variety we'd start from the right and work left, and sometimes from the inboard working out. However, generally we'd start far left and work right, 1, 2, 3, 4. Most others operating alongside us, which included DC4's, DC6's, and DC7's, did the same.

In the C-130, we operated typically 1, 2, 3, and 4, but also frequently started or taxied on just the inboards.

In the B747...1, 2, 3, 4.

In the C97...1, 2, 3, 4.
SNS3Guppy is offline   Reply
Old 22nd May 2009, 05:32   #19 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Wingham NSW Australia
Age: 72
Posts: 1,008
Engine start sequence

Don't know what C130 you flew Guppy, but on the A, E and H models I operated on we started #3 then #4 followed by GTC/APU shutdown then started #2 followed by #1. (On "A" the GTC doors were manually closed. Guess the "E" and "H" just followed the traditional way). L/M aboard, "Doors closed/Checked" Tristar as #2 first then #3 and #1. Pretty sure the B707 and B747 Classics we used same as C130.
Old Fella is offline   Reply
Old 22nd May 2009, 07:05   #20 (permalink)

 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: USA
Posts: 3,262
I operated on the A model C-130, and we started 1, 2, 3, and 4 in that order. If we taxied on 2 engines, then 2, 3, in that order. We also operated our GTC until takeoff, it had no doors, and we had no limitations on operating it in flight, if necessary. Our A models were not the same as yours.

We had different motors, different propellers, a GTC upgrade, and other significant airframe differences and modifications.

On the 747 we operate 1, 2, 3, and 4, save for occasions when we taxi on only the inboards...in which case we do 2, then 3.
SNS3Guppy is offline   Reply
 
 
This ad will disappear if you login
Reply
 


Thread Tools


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT. The time now is 09:44.


vBulletin® v3.8.7, Copyright ©2000-2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
SEO by vBSEO 3.6.1
© 1996-2012 The Professional Pilots Rumour Network

As these are anonymous forums the origins of the contributions may be opposite to what may be apparent. In fact the press may use it, or the unscrupulous, or sciolists*, to elicit certain reactions.

*"sciolist"... Noun, archaic. "a person who pretends to be knowledgeable and well informed".