PPRuNe Forums

Go Back   PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Forgotten your Username/Password?
PPRuNe Email Register FAQ Calendar Advertise Mark Forums Read

Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 2nd September 2008, 21:05   #1 (permalink)
FIRESYSOK
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Zone of Alienation
Age: 63
Posts: 115
Unusual A320 sub panel

Anyone know what the small LCD display with and ON/OFF and TEST switch is on the captain-side glareshield is? Seems to be on older LH and BA aircraft.

http://cdn-www.airliners.net/aviatio.../3/1077372.jpg

FIRESYSOK is offline  
Reply
Old 2nd September 2008, 21:10   #2 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: USA
Age: 26
Posts: 29
Its like the frontend of KITT from night rider. It controls everything.
Tacolegend is offline   Reply
Old 2nd September 2008, 21:11   #3 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Ireland
Posts: 36
I have never seen that before, can anyone tell us what it is?
bsal is offline   Reply
Old 2nd September 2008, 21:16   #4 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Fragrant Harbour
Posts: 2,261
PVI. The para Visual Indicator. Gives the CM1 (PF on LWMO ops) an indication of the runway centreline on low vis take offs. The information comes from the ILS LOC.

Called a PVD (Para Visual Dispaly) on Boeings - just to be different!
Dan Winterland is offline   Reply
Old 2nd September 2008, 22:51   #5 (permalink)
 
Join Date: May 1999
Location: UK
Posts: 95
PVI as above. White bar that shows centreline guidance information. Allows take-off down to 75m RVR.

This thread may help.

What is this ? - AirSimmer Support

DTG
Down Three Greens is offline   Reply
Old 2nd September 2008, 23:35   #6 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: England (N. Downs)
Age: 62
Posts: 386
You two are right, of course. But it was not a user-friendly device, and only gave us a slight reduction in the RVR required. It was only in your peripheral vision, because you were still watching the rwy centreline lights (of which only one or two are visible at a time in low-vis, but you have to use them). As the PVI (LCD display) was only at arm's length, it was out of focus, particularly for those of us with presbyopia.

[For those not au-fait, the most difficult stage of a low-vis take-off is the beginning. Once the centreline lights start to "stream" under the nose, the fact that only one or two are visible at any one moment ceases to be a problem.]

There was a similar idea to the PVI on the A310, but I found it much easier to use because it was in the form of a head-up display, focused at infinity I think.
Chris Scott is offline   Reply
Old 3rd September 2008, 00:53   #7 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Europe
Posts: 159
Quote:
But it was not a user-friendly device
That is right, and is one of the reasons the PVI was set INOP on the Lufthansa A320 fleet - and that picture is a Lufthansa aircraft (D-AIPH).
DBate is offline   Reply
Old 3rd September 2008, 12:50   #8 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Fragrant Harbour
Posts: 2,261
It's a better device than the Boeing one which looks like a horizontal barber's pole. It rotates if off the centrline, but it's not that obvious which way you have to turn to get back on!
Dan Winterland is offline   Reply
Old 3rd September 2008, 13:20   #9 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: SE England
Age: 51
Posts: 1,238
Quote:
it's not that obvious which way you have to turn to get back on!
well I find it totally intuitive on the 747 - you steer in the direction the indicator is streaming, couldn't be more natural imho
TopBunk is online now   Reply
Old 3rd September 2008, 14:40   #10 (permalink)
Nemo Me Impune Lacessit
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Victoria
Posts: 1,006
Agree with Top Bunk, couldn't do without it on the -400 in low viz. It is a 'Command' instrument, you do what it says!
parabellum is online now   Reply
Old 3rd September 2008, 14:47   #11 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Manchester, England
Posts: 158
Its installed on some of our 330's. Not used these days though after the CAA said "How do you train on it?"

"Erm, we can't, no sims to do it within cost..."

Bugger.
Tight Slot is online now   Reply
Old 3rd September 2008, 15:08   #12 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: 58-33N. 00-18W. Peterborough UK
Posts: 1,752
Seems the Trident may also have had problems with it.

[IMG][/IMG]
forget is online now   Reply
Old 3rd September 2008, 18:41   #13 (permalink)

Do a Hover - it avoids G
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Chichester West Sussex UK
Age: 75
Posts: 1,038
I am with Dan here a bit. PVDs had a very dubious history when the were first introduced in the mid 60s. Then they were used in pitch and roll not just yaw. The issue of course is whether they are telling you to follow them or oppose them. With two or perhaps three as they were first deployed this clearly confused a lot of us when we tried them.

I can also understand how this might not be a problem with one in yaw as TopBunk suggests.

Indeed I remember a similar issue with the Harrier rudder pedal shakers - only one shook and was that the one you had to push or leave alone? We sorted that out with the 'stamp out vibration' motto.
John Farley is offline   Reply
Old 3rd September 2008, 19:28   #14 (permalink)
gonebutnotforgotten
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: London
Posts: 23
PVI (or D) sense

I understood the idea was to be consistent with the 'natural' view out of the window - if the outside world moves to the left, you need left rudder to bring it back again (similar sense for other axes, but by the time I got to the Trident, only the lateral mode - for take-off and roll-out guidance - remained). So one had to think of the little diamonds as belonging outside.... but whatever worked for the individual was OK.

And how about the old cylindrical Directional Gyros, not exactly intuitive until one got the 'roll the numbers down the slope' mantra off pat. And while we're at it, which way should moving tapes move? High numbers at the top, so the tape slides down as the quantity increases, or vice versa? Good cases can be, and have been, made for both. And finally don't let us forget that the some Russians use horizons that are the wrong way round, the little airplane moves while the horizon remains steady relative to the aircraft, help!

gonebutnotforgotten is offline  

Reply
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes


Posting Rules
vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Question re unusual noise on A320 shogan1977 Passengers & SLF (Self Loading Freight) 6 7th September 2008 18:55
external power panel light test A320 avionneta Tech Log 5 14th January 2008 14:29
A320 flightdeck panel Edrian Engineers & Technicians 2 2nd July 2006 04:31
A320 panel / aircraft (???) SilvaBravo Computer/Internet Issues & Troubleshooting 5 15th December 2002 18:25
A320 Panel for Flight Sim Tom Cat Tech Log 3 29th October 2000 14:04


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:38.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC7
© 1996-2008 The Professional Pilots Rumour Network

As these are anonymous forums the origins of the contributions may be opposite to what may be apparent. In fact the press may use it, or the unscrupulous, or sciolists*, to elicit certain reactions.

*"sciolist"... Noun, archaic. "a person who pretends to be knowledgeable and well informed".