PPRuNe Forums

Go Back   PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Forgotten your Username/Password?
PPRuNe Email Register FAQ Calendar Advertise Mark Forums Read

Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 30th August 2008, 12:58   #1 (permalink)
QuEsT147
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Slovakia
Posts: 17
Fuel Dump system question, necessity

Hi guys

I would like to find out, why for some aircraft a fuel dump system is necessary. According to regulations, an aircraft must have a fuel dump system if it is unable to comply with certain climb requirements, or so, I do not know the exact definition.

But here is the question... The aircraft must be able to take-off safely with one engine inop at MTOW, then how is it possible that it cannot conduct a go-around at weight which is always less than MTOW without dumping fuel?

Maybe I do not understand it correctly, please explain it to me

Thanks much for help

QuEsT147

QuEsT147 is offline  
Reply
Old 30th August 2008, 14:32   #2 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: france
Posts: 218
Greetings,
You have to take into consideration, that you have flaps (more drag) gear down (more drag)
It is not always that you are Approach/landing climb limited
kijangnim is offline   Reply
Old 30th August 2008, 14:53   #3 (permalink)
Chief Tardis Technician
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Western Australia S31.715 E115.737
Age: 56
Posts: 234
Also to be taken in to consideration is the max landing weight. If the craft is overweight for landing, the undercarriage may collapse, puncture the wings and cause a massive / fire explosion, generaly believed to not good. Much better to dump the excess load and land safely(ish).
Avtrician is online now   Reply
Old 30th August 2008, 15:08   #4 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: La Belle Province
Posts: 1,232
Quote:
I do not know the exact definition.
The requirement as of amdt 25-108 in 14 CFR 25 is:

Quote:
§ 25.1001 Fuel jettisoning system.

(a) A fuel jettisoning system must be installed on each airplane unless it is shown that the airplane meets the climb requirements of §§25.119 and 25.121(d) at maximum takeoff weight, less the actual or computed weight of fuel necessary for a 15-minute flight comprised of a takeoff, go-around, and landing at the airport of departure with the airplane configuration, speed, power, and thrust the same as that used in meeting the applicable takeoff, approach, and landing climb performance requirements of this part.
Mad (Flt) Scientist is offline   Reply
Old 30th August 2008, 16:14   #5 (permalink)
Warning Toxic!
Disgusted of Tunbridge
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Hampshire, UK
Posts: 2,510
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz

Last edited by Rainboe : 14th September 2008 at 20:44.
Rainboe is offline   Reply
Old 31st August 2008, 01:35   #6 (permalink)
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: New York
Posts: 486
Many 767s do not have a fuel dump system.
Roadtrip is offline   Reply
Old 31st August 2008, 02:38   #7 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Australia
Posts: 366
Quote:
Many 767s do not have a fuel dump system.
767's come in different weights, lengths and fuel capacity. The lighter and shorter ones don't need fuel jettison.
NSEU is offline   Reply
Old 31st August 2008, 04:40   #8 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: East side of OZ
Age: 56
Posts: 225
And the funny thing about the B767 fuel dump system, you can only dump from the centre wing tank and with full wing tanks and an average ZFW you'll still be well over max landng weight.

Regards,
BH.
Bullethead is online now   Reply
Old 31st August 2008, 05:13   #9 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: france
Posts: 218
Greetings,
Bullethead
Center tank have to be empty before wing fuel tanks are used, due to wing to body(bending moment).... In fact the first limitation on the 767 was not allowed 10 tonnes in center tank with less than full tank in the wings, was then improved to 700 kgs in the center tank
kijangnim is offline   Reply
Old 31st August 2008, 07:31   #10 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: East side of OZ
Age: 56
Posts: 225
G'day kijangnim,

Yeah, I realise the CWT is used before the wing tanks, due to wing bending relief, my point was that even though some the B767s I fly have a fuel dump system with any sort of normal ZFW you still can't dump to below max landing weight.

E.g. ZFW 125.0T Max is 130.6T
Full wing tanks 36.0T
AUW 161.0T
Max Ldg Wt 145.1T

There is no fuel dump capability from the wing tanks.

Regards,
BH.

P.S. One of these days I'm going to leave all the typos uncorrected, it makes for much more interesting reading.
Bullethead is online now   Reply
Old 31st August 2008, 12:45   #11 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Posts: 813
Yeah Bullethead...

It's the same setup on the B737 fuel dump system.

Cheers...FD...
Flight Detent is offline   Reply
Old 31st August 2008, 13:00   #12 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Riga
Posts: 173
Forgive my stupidity here, but if dumping from CWT on the 76, is it then possible to interrupt the dump, feed wing to CWT and then re-commence dump?

I have no information or experience of the 767 whatsoever so I am trying to visulize (and learn), as my job could loosely involve some old 200s this side of Christmas.

RIX
Romeo India Xray is offline   Reply
Old 31st August 2008, 13:43   #13 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: East side of OZ
Age: 56
Posts: 225
You can turn off the dump pumps and close the dump valves whenever you wish and also recommence if needs be.

There is no capability to transfer fuel from any tank to any other tank, you can feed either engine from any tank or dump from the CWT only.

I'd be surprised if a 200 series B767 had a fuel dump capability.

Regards,
BH
Bullethead is online now   Reply
Old 31st August 2008, 18:21   #14 (permalink)
Romeo India Xray
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Riga
Posts: 173
Bullethead

Many thanks for that. I wont be flying them (I will be relegated/promoted whichever way you look at it, to turboprop land by then), only working closely with people who will.

RIX

Romeo India Xray is offline  
Reply
Old 3rd September 2008, 02:12   #15 (permalink)
SNS3Guppy
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: USA
Posts: 1,561
We're able to land overweight, with a maximum descent rate prescribed, and a requirement for an overweight landing inspection. However, when we plan for a fuel dump, it's the aircraft performance that concerns us, to include landing speeds and distance, more than the weight.

SNS3Guppy is offline  
Reply
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes


Posting Rules
vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
To fuel dump or not to fuel dump... SaturnV Spectators Balcony (Spotters Corner) 22 24th September 2005 13:52
757 Fuel Dump LowNSlow Tech Log 12 5th October 2004 23:07
330 v 340 Fuel Dump? OhForSure Tech Log 11 12th September 2004 16:25
fuel dump vs. overweight. ldg. MaxBlow Tech Log 16 23rd August 2003 21:02
Why no fuel dump on Airbus? Bubbette Questions 8 16th November 2001 17:54


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:53.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC7
© 1996-2008 The Professional Pilots Rumour Network

As these are anonymous forums the origins of the contributions may be opposite to what may be apparent. In fact the press may use it, or the unscrupulous, or sciolists*, to elicit certain reactions.

*"sciolist"... Noun, archaic. "a person who pretends to be knowledgeable and well informed".