PPRuNe Forums

Go Back   PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Forgotten your Username/Password?
PPRuNe Email Register FAQ Calendar Advertise Mark Forums Read

Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 29th August 2008, 23:14   #1 (permalink)
nick murry
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Australia
Posts: 37
On the taxi

Hello,,

I have a question from an instructor that requires an answer.

What is the recommended distance between jet aircraft on the taxi??

Thanks for your help..

nick murry is offline  
Reply
Old 29th August 2008, 23:25   #2 (permalink)
Warning Toxic!
Disgusted of Tunbridge
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Hampshire, UK
Posts: 2,510
Enough to stop the exhaust bubbling the paintwork around the flightdeck and being ingested into the engines! Longer if you are going into a headwind behind the other jet. You can see the effect on the TAT probe readings which can go up alarmingly. Longer for a big widebody, and enough to stop the jet in front buffeting you. Short enough to allow the airport to have more than about 2 jets taxiing at the same time! There is no set figure.
Rainboe is offline   Reply
Old 30th August 2008, 04:24   #3 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: france
Posts: 218
Greetings,
I think it is 30 meters, and it is based on fire fighting access, to be confirmed of course
kijangnim is offline   Reply
Old 30th August 2008, 08:44   #4 (permalink)

Bottums Up
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: dunnunda
Age: 51
Posts: 2,162
In Australia a common criteria is the requirement in CAO 20.9, section 5.1.4; that is 46 m behind a jet at breakaway thrust, and 30m behind a jet at ground idle thrust.
Capt Claret is offline   Reply
Old 30th August 2008, 09:29   #5 (permalink)
Warning Toxic!
Disgusted of Tunbridge
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Hampshire, UK
Posts: 2,510
Well blow me down, there is a figure! I have been using common sense for 37 years. It tends to get a little bit windy to get out and measure 30 or 46 metres, not that I am any good at judging distances like that anyway, especially from a Boeing flightdeck (of all models!). The darn exhaust blows the tape measure to hell. Guess that's why the hair is thinning!
Rainboe is offline   Reply
Old 30th August 2008, 10:54   #6 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Cambs/Herts
Posts: 675
Taxiing once in FRA some years ago in LVP conditions, I discovered a good reason that rearward facing white position lights should remain fixed to the tail and not be put on the wingtips, as is now the fashion.
The smell of badly burned parrafin wafted into the cockpit and caused me to slow down. On looking UP, I saw the APU exhaust of a B747 about 3m in front of me! He has stopped, presumably to check his position, and not told the Ground freq.
I would suggest that that was too close.
Some choice exchanges followed between myself and Grnd on the issue of monitoring the Ground radar.
They sent a tug to move him to prevent blast damage to my little 737.
rubik101 is offline   Reply
Old 30th August 2008, 12:48   #7 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: UK
Posts: 50
The same as if you were driving your car in a traffic jam! Space to let you turn around and pull out if the one in front goes tech and cant move...
crewcostundercontrol is offline   Reply
Old 30th August 2008, 12:56   #8 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Jun 1999
Location: Fragrant harbour
Posts: 1,169
While I can't say "it would never happen to me" I must ask who was watching where you were driving????? Obviously not you.

I know it was LVP but come on? how low was the Vis? 15 m?
ACMS is offline   Reply
Old 30th August 2008, 19:05   #9 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 41
rubik, thread drift I know but..

EXACTLY the same thing happened to me! I was saved by FO who simply slammed on the brakes. My initial response was "WTF are you doing"" followed immediately by "Oh my God" when I saw an Airbus tail cone barely a metre in front of me!

Needless to say I bought the beers that night. Wing-tip "tail" lights are fine, but in my humble opinion, they should reinstate the proper TAIL light.
fullyspooled is offline   Reply
Old 31st August 2008, 14:11   #10 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Fragrant Harbour
Posts: 2,261
50m in China.
Dan Winterland is offline   Reply
Old 31st August 2008, 14:53   #11 (permalink)
Spitoon
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Europe
Posts: 1,751
Just continuing the thread drift prompted by rubik
Quote:
Some choice exchanges followed between myself and Grnd on the issue of monitoring the Ground radar.
Idle curiosity really, but what makes you expect ATC to monitor the surface movement radar - and what do you think ATC's responsibilities are if they do?

Spitoon is offline  
Reply
Old 3rd September 2008, 02:17   #12 (permalink)
SNS3Guppy
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: USA
Posts: 1,561
Quote:
The smell of badly burned parrafin wafted into the cockpit and caused me to slow down. On looking UP, I saw the APU exhaust of a B747 about 3m in front of me! He has stopped, presumably to check his position, and not told the Ground freq.
I would suggest that that was too close.
See and avoid still works, on the ground, too.

Perhaps the problem is in the "looking up." One ought to be heads up all the time, especially if one is in a position where one needs to "slow down."

I've never seen a standard or requirement setting an in-trail distance during taxi.

SNS3Guppy is offline  
Reply
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes


Posting Rules
vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Single engine taxi vs no engine taxi? Screwballs Tech Log 8 16th April 2008 21:38
Max Taxi Imb35 Flight/Ground Ops, Crewing and Dispatch 3 15th May 2007 18:22
min vis for taxi it.pilot737 Tech Log 10 23rd February 2007 19:43
Air taxi etc rex Biz Jets, Ag Flying, GA etc. 0 26th June 2002 00:04
Air Taxi Snap Biz Jets, Ag Flying, GA etc. 3 18th October 2000 02:09


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:23.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC7
© 1996-2008 The Professional Pilots Rumour Network

As these are anonymous forums the origins of the contributions may be opposite to what may be apparent. In fact the press may use it, or the unscrupulous, or sciolists*, to elicit certain reactions.

*"sciolist"... Noun, archaic. "a person who pretends to be knowledgeable and well informed".