PPRuNe Forums

Go Back   PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Forgotten your Username/Password?


Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web


Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools
Old 12th Jul 2004, 00:12   #1 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Always On the Road
Posts: 11
Wink TAKEOFF Distance & Gadient Requirements

Could you be so kind as to explain any relationship between the 4 segment takeoff specification climb gradient requirements the supplementary takeoff distances climb gradient requirements and the aircraft TOW adjustment to comply with both of the above
yawskidball is offline  
Old 12th Jul 2004, 06:44   #2 (permalink)
Moderator
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: various places .....
Posts: 4,957
(a) Climb Gradients.

For each design standard (eg FAR 25), there are minimum airworthiness gradients in different configurations. These are usually referred to a WAT-limits (as the main parameters affecting them are aircraft Weight, Altitude, and outside air Temperature). These limits serve to provide some minimum likelihood that the aircraft will, in fact, be able to climb at a modest rate.

The four segment WAT limits (sometimes five) apply to heavy turbine designs - jet and turboprop.

If the actual weight is less than the WAT-limited weight, then the aircraft's climb capability will improve. This information is available in the flight manual takeoff chart section.

(b) Obstacle Clearance.

For determining optimum payload (meaning maximum payload) one matches the aircraft climb capability against the actual runway, after takeoff obstacles etc.

(c) STODA

Supplementary TakeOff Distance Available - otherwise known as effective operational length in some quarters.

The TODA (takeoff distance available) is measured from the end of the runway (clearway if declared) and has no regard to obstacles - as a result the gradient from end TODA to the critical obstacle (ie that which gives the highest gradient) can be sufficiently high as to render the TODA not much use to the heavy operator.

If the optimised process (b) is not practicable for some reason, the operator may look at the declared STODA values (reduced length TODA values which result in a specific gradient which clears all obstacles within the declared trapezoid). Provided the available gradient from the flight manual is not less than the STODA, then the weight is fine. This is complicated somewhat when we consider the level third segment but that is only a complication which can be addressed in various ways.

(d) Aircraft Weight

Weight -

more = decreased climb gradient
less = increased climb gradient

The relationship is a matter of iterative analysis to find the maximum weight which meets both WAT and obstacle clearance requirements

Last edited by john_tullamarine; 12th Jul 2004 at 06:54.
john_tullamarine is offline  
 
 
This ad will disappear if you login
Closed Thread
 


Thread Tools


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT. The time now is 00:57.


vBulletin® v3.8.7, Copyright ©2000-2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
SEO by vBSEO 3.6.1
© 1996-2012 The Professional Pilots Rumour Network

As these are anonymous forums the origins of the contributions may be opposite to what may be apparent. In fact the press may use it, or the unscrupulous, or sciolists*, to elicit certain reactions.

*"sciolist"... Noun, archaic. "a person who pretends to be knowledgeable and well informed".