Wikiposts
Search
Spectators Balcony (Spotters Corner) If you're not a professional pilot but want to discuss issues about the job, this is the best place to loiter. You won't be moved on by 'security' and there'll be plenty of experts to answer any questions.

Fog

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 30th Dec 2016, 17:30
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: london
Age: 58
Posts: 252
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Fog

With the currant weather conditions could some one tell me does airports like gatwick Heathrow charge airlines for the use of ILS System when this happens with aircraft nowadays with there Computer systems so advance does this happen?
lotus1 is offline  
Old 30th Dec 2016, 17:59
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 1998
Location: London, UK
Posts: 1,992
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Aircraft use the ILS for virtually all approaches at Heathrow and Gatwick regardless of weather. There is no extra charge.
Groundloop is offline  
Old 30th Dec 2016, 18:15
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Reading, UK
Posts: 15,818
Received 201 Likes on 93 Posts
They used to charge for it, but found that they needed detector vans because airlines claimed they hadn't used it even though they had.

Joking aside, MLS (microwave) and RNAV approaches are gradually supplanting ILS, though the latter will be around for a long time yet.
DaveReidUK is offline  
Old 30th Dec 2016, 18:16
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 1999
Location: world
Posts: 3,424
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Currant weather can interfere with the beam though!
Hotel Tango is offline  
Old 30th Dec 2016, 18:34
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: jersey
Age: 74
Posts: 1,486
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Raining dry grapes, is it ?
kcockayne is offline  
Old 30th Dec 2016, 18:43
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Botswana
Posts: 887
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by DaveReidUK
MLS (microwave) and RNAV approaches are gradually supplanting ILS, though the latter will be around for a long time yet.
If gradually supplanting ILS means at an absolute snail's pace then I'd tend to agree with you but, in reality, the only true statement there is the second. As you know, RNAV approaches are nowhere near as accurate in terms of altitude, which is why they have higher minima and decision altitudes. Additionally, funding for the MLS is rumoured to be about to be discontinued at Heathrow.
RexBanner is offline  
Old 30th Dec 2016, 21:33
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Berkshire, UK
Age: 79
Posts: 8,268
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
<<Currant weather can interfere with the beam though! >>

Really.... do tell.
HEATHROW DIRECTOR is offline  
Old 30th Dec 2016, 21:39
  #8 (permalink)  

Avoid imitations
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Wandering the FIR and cyberspace often at highly unsociable times
Posts: 14,573
Received 422 Likes on 222 Posts
What is the raisin for asking?
ShyTorque is offline  
Old 31st Dec 2016, 14:55
  #9 (permalink)  
Paxing All Over The World
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Hertfordshire, UK.
Age: 67
Posts: 10,149
Received 62 Likes on 50 Posts
To be serious for a moment - the reality that this fog shows up is the changing climate. Ignore, for a moment why it is changing.

We normally get fog in November, as the still warm land is covered by cold moist air. The fact that it happened in late December is a significant change. If happens like this for more years it helps to show how we have to be ready for the changing climate.
PAXboy is offline  
Old 31st Dec 2016, 15:28
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 1,195
Received 10 Likes on 7 Posts
Err... I think that's the wrong way around:

Advection Fog. Forms when quite warm, moist and stable air is blown across a cooler surface (land or water). The air temperature falls until the dew point is reached and condensation occurs.

Typically occurs in the UK with a relatively warm SW airflow (nice long sea track to pick up moisture in the lower layers).
Yellow Sun is online now  
Old 31st Dec 2016, 16:09
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: last time I looked I was still here.
Posts: 4,507
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Use ILS in FOG = land therefore a landing fee. No ILS in a/c = divert = no landing fee at intended destination. However, airfield A has same landing fee in CAVOK, and even if you make a visual(are there still pilots who can do that????). I suspect airfields with an ILS charge more for landing than those without. Someone has to pay for it.
RAT 5 is offline  
Old 31st Dec 2016, 18:50
  #12 (permalink)  
Paxing All Over The World
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Hertfordshire, UK.
Age: 67
Posts: 10,149
Received 62 Likes on 50 Posts
OK!! No worries about the manifest ways that fog can be generated. The point was that, whilst we have been used to fog from November onwards (on the roads as much as the airports, of course) I think it unusual to not have had serious fog until xmas.
PAXboy is offline  
Old 31st Dec 2016, 22:16
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: UK
Posts: 455
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
my recollection for bad fog was spring and early summer rather than winter.
noflynomore is offline  
Old 31st Dec 2016, 22:34
  #14 (permalink)  
Paxing All Over The World
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Hertfordshire, UK.
Age: 67
Posts: 10,149
Received 62 Likes on 50 Posts
My recollections of fog were for Spring and Autumn when the seasons change. Hence my remark that FIRST big fog of the seasons arriving in late December - is unusual.
PAXboy is offline  
Old 31st Dec 2016, 22:51
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 1999
Location: world
Posts: 3,424
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
my recollection for bad fog was spring and early summer rather than winter.
I can recall many pea soupers from anywhere in late October to early December many many moons ago. Whatever, it certainly is not limited to Spring and early Summer.
Hotel Tango is offline  
Old 31st Dec 2016, 23:57
  #16 (permalink)  
Paxing All Over The World
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Hertfordshire, UK.
Age: 67
Posts: 10,149
Received 62 Likes on 50 Posts
Indeed. But I am used to hearing of fog, canx flights and crashes on motorways earlier than this time of year.
PAXboy is offline  
Old 1st Jan 2017, 07:11
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: LHR/EGLL
Age: 45
Posts: 4,392
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
MLS is not supplanting ILS, in fact MLS will be dead and buried within a few years. It's not that funding is going to run out, it's that nobody manufactures the system any more, and the current one is about to reach it's end of life. The main benefits of MLS (smaller sensitive area in CAT II/III ops) have largely been replicated by the new 32-element array ILS localiser antenna on the market now anyway.

A standard RNAV GNSS (APV Baro VNAV) approach can't get to the same decision height as a CAT I ILS, so that won't do it either.

GBAS will, especially when CAT III certification is granted.

However, even new aircraft coming out of the factories now are noit fitted for GBAS, so ILS will be around for another 30 years at least.
Gonzo is online now  
Old 1st Jan 2017, 07:46
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Wildest Surrey
Age: 75
Posts: 10,815
Received 95 Likes on 68 Posts
Originally Posted by Gonzo
MLS is not supplanting ILS, in fact MLS will be dead and buried within a few years. It's not that funding is going to run out, it's that nobody manufactures the system any more, and the current one is about to reach it's end of life. The main benefits of MLS (smaller sensitive area in CAT II/III ops) have largely been replicated by the new 32-element array ILS localiser antenna on the market now anyway.
On my NATS Staff Course in 1986, we were told no new ILS' were to be commisoned after about 1992 and old ones would be phased out in favour of MLS'.
Based on this, we decided not to go for ILS at Farnborough but go straight for MLS. In the interim, until a 'rich' civil operator took over the airfield, we toyed with another much cheaper system called 'TLS', a transponder based precision guidance system which, as it had been approved by the FAA, the CAA said they would 'rubber stamp'.
As soon as it was installed, the CAA decided it would need 5 years of evaluation before they could approve it for IFR use!!
So Farnborough ended up with ILS after all, with some operators cleared to operate to less than Cat 1 minima ie RVR 300m.

Last edited by chevvron; 2nd Jan 2017 at 06:03.
chevvron is offline  
Old 1st Jan 2017, 15:37
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: I wouldn't know.
Posts: 4,497
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
GLS/GBAS could probably replace the ILS at some point. I have seen some trial approaches for CAT IIIb operation and it is a very impressive system. Currently only approved for CAT I though. Not to mention quite a bit cheaper than an ILS for every runway direction, especially for airports with several runways.
Denti is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.