New MH370 BBC article 12 Sep - mentioning new and 'burnt' debris
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: London
Posts: 95
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
New MH370 BBC article 12 Sep - mentioning new and 'burnt' debris
MH370 search: New debris in Madagascar includes 'burnt parts' - BBC News
Still can't get over how there's only 1 person looking for debris and even that's of his own volition.
NEW LINK from Telegraph: Further info and better pics http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2016...lane-may-have/
Only found out today re this wing section - the largest piece of MH370 to date if confirmed - found on Pemba in Tanzania in June / July this year http://www.news.com.au/travel/travel...f29c0c8d7f5941
Still can't get over how there's only 1 person looking for debris and even that's of his own volition.
NEW LINK from Telegraph: Further info and better pics http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2016...lane-may-have/
Only found out today re this wing section - the largest piece of MH370 to date if confirmed - found on Pemba in Tanzania in June / July this year http://www.news.com.au/travel/travel...f29c0c8d7f5941
Last edited by Phoenix1969; 12th Sep 2016 at 22:37. Reason: Further info and better pics
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Bear Island
Posts: 598
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
What I find equally curious is the lack of interest on this forum !
"the burnt pieces appeared to be from the cargo hold, or the avionics bay, rather than from the main cabin."
That would indeed cast a new light on a few matters, and pose some significant new questions.
"the burnt pieces appeared to be from the cargo hold, or the avionics bay, rather than from the main cabin."
That would indeed cast a new light on a few matters, and pose some significant new questions.
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Perth - Western Australia
Age: 75
Posts: 1,805
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The opinion that the burnt item is a section of the MH370 fuselage - and supposedly from the avionics bay - is purely the opinion of the finder, and not backed by any authority.
We have to recognise that Blaine Gibson is a man driven by a desire to find MH370 and wreckage from MH370 - and nearly every piece of flotsam or jetsam that he finds on Madagascan or Mauritian shores, must be from MH370.
I do admire Mr Gibsons single-mindedness to try and find MH370, and the reason/s behind its demise - but he is conjecturing to all the assembled headline-hungry media of the world - and probably the best thing he could do, and what he is apparently planning to do, is to take every suspect item he has found, directly to the ATSB for professional investigation and evaluation.
The explanation for the burn marks could be something relatively innocuous and simple - or it could be ominous.
Only expert air crash investigators have the ability and equipment to come up with a qualified opinion.
We have to recognise that Blaine Gibson is a man driven by a desire to find MH370 and wreckage from MH370 - and nearly every piece of flotsam or jetsam that he finds on Madagascan or Mauritian shores, must be from MH370.
I do admire Mr Gibsons single-mindedness to try and find MH370, and the reason/s behind its demise - but he is conjecturing to all the assembled headline-hungry media of the world - and probably the best thing he could do, and what he is apparently planning to do, is to take every suspect item he has found, directly to the ATSB for professional investigation and evaluation.
The explanation for the burn marks could be something relatively innocuous and simple - or it could be ominous.
Only expert air crash investigators have the ability and equipment to come up with a qualified opinion.
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: London
Posts: 95
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The opinion that the burnt item is a section of the MH370 fuselage - and supposedly from the avionics bay - is purely the opinion of the finder, and not backed by any authority.
Last edited by Phoenix1969; 13th Sep 2016 at 10:31.
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: London
Posts: 95
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
HT - you may be right about honeycomb being used in the constriction of some yachts, but my money is on at least one of THESE parts being from a plane. A yacht wouldn't have a row of half-turn fasteners like in the first picture.
A quick analysis of the 2 burnt pieces 1/looks like the burn marks occured before they were shattered. 2/the heat source was intense and of a short duration as internal structure not melted.3/ the heat source effected both sides equally 4/burn marks show unequal burn intensity, blowtorch effect.5/as both pieces were found on different beaches unlikely they were burnt in a fisherman's beach fire.
Last edited by birdspeed; 15th Sep 2016 at 07:42.
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: London
Posts: 95
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Now confirmed that that big bit found on Pemba WAS from MH370 - the inboard section of the right, outboard flap MH370 search: Tanzania debris 'part of missing plane' - BBC News
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Potomac Heights
Posts: 470
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Maybe I'm mistaken, but I don't think that it has yet been established that the possibly burned item in question came from MH370. Therefore, all of this speculation about whether it is burnt or not and what that may mean is premature.
