PPRuNe Forums

Go Back   PPRuNe Forums > Misc. Forums > Spectators Balcony (Spotters Corner)
Forgotten your Username/Password?

Spectators Balcony (Spotters Corner) If you're not a professional pilot but want to discuss issues about the job, this is the best place to loiter. You won't be moved on by 'security' and there'll be plenty of experts to answer any questions.


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 28th Apr 2012, 10:05   #21 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: UK
Posts: 562
The fact that the video is being played back at faster than normal speed makes things look a bit more dramatic.
AircraftOperations is offline   Reply
Old 28th Apr 2012, 11:20   #22 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Gloucestershire
Age: 56
Posts: 294
One also has to take into account the perspective added to the speed. The video is taken on a telephoto lens looking down the runway giving a poor perspective. To make a comparison you would need to see a side view to compare. Dont forget that operations would have been conducted within crosswind liimts. Recently I have also seen videos from a similar viewpoint at Dusseldorf. I am sure that there are probably hundreds on Youtube.
xtypeman is offline   Reply
Old 28th Apr 2012, 15:17   #23 (permalink)

Aviator Extraordinaire
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Oklahoma City, Oklahoma USA
Age: 67
Posts: 1,771
Quote:
What I mean is, If your silly enough to try it go for it
Silly? What a completely inappropriate and non-appropriable term. We are not payed to be silly. To suggest that freight pilots have a less professional attitude toward flight safety is absurd, along with being completely false.

It is quite obvious that you are not an experienced pilot and the orifice you are talking out of is not your mouth.

Do not attempt to make professional criticisms in a profession that you are not a professional in.


Oh, and one more point, it is spelled you're.
con-pilot is offline   Reply
Old 28th Apr 2012, 17:10   #24 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: The Burrow, N53:48:02 W1:48:57, The Tin Tent - EGBS, EGBO
Posts: 2,207
Quote:
If you were a freighter with nothing but the freight to lose go for it
So the lives of those who fly freight are worth less than those who fly people? Rubbish! They are worth EXACTLY the same.
DX Wombat is offline   Reply
Old 29th Apr 2012, 01:14   #25 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: location loaction
Posts: 221
Ok, its clear I've stood on toes here and so I have edited my post.

Con-Pilot, a bloke your age that has been a "Professional" for soooo long should, by now, be able to hold your tongue and/or put your point across in a more "Professional" manner rather than have a hissyfit like a 6 year old.

I am the first to admit my posts didn't read as well as I hoped and by no means are the lives of freighter pilots worth less than pax pilots. I meant that freighter pilots do not have to worry about pax comfort in rough conditions.

DX Wombat would love to know exactly what sound like.


Rocket
rocket66 is offline   Reply
Old 29th Apr 2012, 09:10   #26 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: UK
Posts: 70
Windy Bilbao

Some interesting landings here: BBC News - High winds shake planes landing in Bilbao, Spain

Maybe not the best thing to watch while in the departure lounge at LHR, but it is a bit calmer than that here, thankfully.
LondonPax is offline   Reply
Old 29th Apr 2012, 13:54   #27 (permalink)
Paxing All Over The World
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Hertfordshire, UK.
Age: 58
Posts: 7,040
Happens all the time, as pilots do their stuff. Not always caught on camera. Not always a quiet news day!

Thread tunning here: http://www.pprune.org/spectators-bal...ers-corner-52/
PAXboy is offline   Reply
Old 29th Apr 2012, 14:16   #28 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Cardiff
Age: 38
Posts: 73
What about the runways everyone forgot?

Tartare's very interesting assembly of cross-wind landings highlights a problem in many of the world's airports where the main runway alignment is selected to line up with the prevailing winds and there's nothing else to land on when the wind doesn't oblige.

Today at Cardiff Airport for example several flights had to be diverted or delayed because of high crosswinds which made landing on the main runway almost impossible.

But this begs the question - what about the other runway?. After all, most UK airports started life as RAF bases where there'd always be two runways in a cruciform formation at about 90 degrees to each other. If one runway was out because of crosswinds then the one aligned at 90 degrees to it would have far less of a problem. Maybe those old RAF guys knew a thing or two.

In civilian life many airports seem to have progressively concentrated on just the main east/west-aligned runway and forgotten all about the other one. Were they right to do so? Maybe there'd be fewer white-knuckle landings if the old layout had been retained .
korrol is offline   Reply
Old 30th Apr 2012, 00:36   #29 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: A better place.
Posts: 720
Errm, not me Guv - it's commercial broadcaster footage - I just linked to it.
Coincidentally, being someone who used to work in TV in another life, as well as being a PPL - even allowing for camera angle and the foreshortening effects of camera zoom - those are still some pretty spectacular crosswind landings.
Yes - crap continuity mixing up different types on approach and touchdown.
And that Challenger/Gulfstream/Jungle Jet thingy that rejects it's landing was blown a loooong way off the centreline!!!
tartare is offline   Reply
Old 30th Apr 2012, 08:37   #30 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Tunbridge Wells, UK
Age: 36
Posts: 96
Quote:
I meant that freighter pilots do not have to worry about pax comfort in rough conditions.
It would appear so from reading threads in the freighter forum - they'll put up with mild/heavy turbulence for longer before attempting to avoid it (I guess that's dependent on what you're carrying as well). The point is up in the cruise they have a choice whether to do that or not. Passenger jets have little choice as to where they are going to land and they can do nothing to avoid weather conditions at their destination. I'm sure the passengers would rather have an uncomfortable landing than divert to an airport miles away where the conditions are better.
TurboTomato is offline   Reply
Old 30th Apr 2012, 13:28   #31 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Belfast
Posts: 58
'I'm sure the passengers would rather have an uncomfortable landing than divert to an airport miles away where the conditions are better.'

Not sure about that TurboT - my guess is that most pax associate an 'uncomfortable landing' with fear of crashing and would be more than happy to divert. Suppose it depends how far away the divert is?

Would make an intersting study i.e. percieved risk of injury v's inconvenience.

Ladies and gentlemen this is yoru captain speaking. Airport A is experiencing severe crosswinds conditions (insert low vis, enormous hailstones etc) currently and statistically there is a very slightly higher risk of an 'incident' occuring. Would you like to proceed to airport A or divert to airport B which is 100 miles away?

Before everyone jumps down my throat, I know that different a/c have different crosswind tolerances and that the captain is a professional etc etc - its just a hypothetical.
Rinty is offline   Reply
Old 30th Apr 2012, 13:49   #32 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Button Moon
Posts: 156
I flew into Vitoria a few hours prior to this footage at Bilbao, just down the road. The wind was horrific, even to the point at 3000 feet the Autopilot wanted to disengage itself. Oh.......and swapped runways twice in 10 mins as well, just to add to the excitement!

The last time I want to see a 72kt wind at 3000'

2W2R
2 Whites 2 Reds is offline   Reply
Old 30th Apr 2012, 13:58   #33 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Dry bar
Age: 41
Posts: 340
Quote:
Interesting that the only decent, stable approach was in a B737.
How could you know whether or not any of those approaches were stable from watching amateur video footage?

Quote:
Hmmmm pays your money and takes your choice. You get what you pay for and maybe you want to bear that in mind when choosing a carrier.
Does that include Lufthansa?


Last edited by shaun ryder; 30th Apr 2012 at 14:20.
shaun ryder is offline   Reply
Reply
 
 
 


Thread Tools


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT. The time now is 11:13.


vBulletin® v3.8.7, Copyright ©2000-2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
SEO by vBSEO 3.6.1
1996-2012 The Professional Pilots Rumour Network