Wikiposts
Search
Spectators Balcony (Spotters Corner) If you're not a professional pilot but want to discuss issues about the job, this is the best place to loiter. You won't be moved on by 'security' and there'll be plenty of experts to answer any questions.

747-800 - combined threads

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 15th Nov 2005, 08:35
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Australia
Posts: 52
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It's official - BOEING takes the plunge with a new 747

SEATTLE, Nov. 14, 2005 -- The Boeing Company [NYSE: BA] today officially launched the new Boeing 747-8 program, which includes the 747-8 Intercontinental passenger airplane and the 747-8 Freighter airplane.

Cargolux, based in Luxembourg, has ordered 10 747-8 Freighters and will take delivery of the first 747-8F in third-quarter 2009. It also holds purchase rights for 10 additional airplanes. Cargolux currently operates an all-Boeing fleet of 13 747-400 freighters.

Nippon Cargo Airlines, based in Japan, has ordered eight 747-8 Freighters and will receive its first airplane in fourth-quarter 2009. The airline also acquired options for six additional airplanes. Nippon Cargo currently operates 13 747 freighters and has six more 747-400Fs on order.

Firm orders from the two launch customers are valued at approximately $5 billion at list prices.

"We are thrilled to have Cargolux and Nippon Cargo choose the new 747-8 and become the launch customers for this next generation of the proud and valuable 747 airplane family," said Alan Mulally, president and chief executive officer, Boeing Commercial Airplanes. "The 747-8 will use the technologies of the 787 Dreamliner to significantly increase the passenger and freighter capabilities of the 747 and offer greater fuel efficiency, improved operating economics, and be more friendly to the environment with reduced noise and emissions."

Both versions of the new 747 will feature GE's 787-technology GEnx engines, meet Stage 4 and QC2 noise requirements, have reduced emissions, offer lower trip costs and have an upgraded flight deck and an improved wing.

"The 747-8 Freighter will be very important in allowing Nippon Cargo to take advantage of the high expected cargo market growth in Asia," said Takuro Uchiyama, president and CEO, Nippon Cargo Airlines. "In addition, the 747-8 Freighter will be the world's most efficient cargo airplane, which is a key attribute with today's high cost of fuel."

Ulrich Ogiermann, president and CEO, Cargolux Airlines, said, "The Boeing 747-400 Freighter has been a cornerstone of our success, and I have high expectations that the 747-8 Freighter will build on that success and expand our capabilities worldwide. The increased payload capacity and much improved efficiency will allow us to continue our expansion and maximize our profitability. Equally important to us and the communities where we operate is the new standard the 747-8 Freighter will set in noise reduction."

The 747-8 Intercontinental passenger airplane will be stretched 3.6 m (11.7 ft) compared to the 747-400 to accommodate 34 additional seats in a typical three-class configuration. The only jetliner in the 400- to 500-seat category, it will have a range of 14,815 km (8,000 nmi) and will feature the new Boeing Signature Interior.

The Intercontinental will be quieter, produce fewer emissions, and achieve better fuel economy than any competing jetliner. It will offer 21 percent more lower-hold revenue cargo volume than the 747-400 and cost about 8 percent less per seat mile to operate. Compared to the A380, it will offer 22 percent lower trip costs.

The 747-8 Freighter will be 5.6 m (18.3 ft) longer than the 747-400 freighter. With a total payload capacity of 140 metric tonnes (154 tons), including tare weight, the 747-8F provides 16 percent more cargo revenue volume than the -400. The additional 117m³ (4,124 ft³) from the longer fuselage offers space for four additional main-deck pallets, two additional lower-hold pallets and two additional lower-hold containers. Cargo can be loaded and unloaded on the 747-8F using both the nose and side doors for maximum speed and efficiency.

Compared to the A380, the 747-8F will offer 20 percent lower trip costs. In addition, the 747-8F will maintain the operational flexibility of today's 747 freighters, with good profit potential at less-than-full loads.

The 747-8 Freighter complements the existing 747-400 freighter family, which is the air-cargo industry's standard. Both models accommodate 3.1-meter (10-foot) high pallets, providing operators with maximum flexibility.

The 747-8 also fits easily in today's aviation infrastructure, flying into more than 210 airports worldwide without additional, expensive infrastructure changes required.

The 747 freighter family currently constitutes more than half of the world's total freighter capacity. Boeing freighters of all models comprise more than 90 percent of the total worldwide freighter lift.

Boeing forecasts the need for about 900 airplanes -- passengers and freighters -- in the 400-plus-seat segment over the next 20 years. Boeing also forecasts that large widebody freighters (65 metric tons and above in capacity) will comprise 34 percent of the freighter market by 2024.
waav8r is offline  
Old 15th Nov 2005, 09:57
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: the edge of madness
Posts: 493
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thoughts on first passenger model orders - CX, SQ even BA or VS?

Torquelink is offline  
Old 15th Nov 2005, 10:59
  #3 (permalink)  
Ecce Homo! Loquitur...
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Peripatetic
Posts: 17,367
Received 1,567 Likes on 713 Posts
Interesting. When Airbus started proposing the A380 Boeing said the 747 replacement market wouldn´t be more than 400 aircraft. Suddenly it´s up to 900+.....
ORAC is online now  
Old 15th Nov 2005, 11:30
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: North of London
Posts: 370
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The 747 is the only Boeing model that has never been stretched, until now. The A380 is too expensive for many airlines, and at the moment limited to only a few airports that can accept it. I am not putting down the A380, which may turn out to be an excellent machine in time, but it hasn't had an order in quite a while. So, Boeing have already 34 orders and no doubt many potential buyers queuing up; good luck to them I say.
Colonel Klink is offline  
Old 15th Nov 2005, 12:03
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 1998
Location: London, UK
Posts: 1,992
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Actually 18 orders, plus 16 options.
Groundloop is offline  
Old 15th Nov 2005, 14:34
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Dallas, TX USA
Posts: 739
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It's about time they announced it.

I wonder how significant the modifications will be from the base 744 (besides the obvious stretch)? I also wonder how much better the economics will be compared to the base 744?

The press pictures do show an interesting looking wing, without the winglets.
Flight Safety is offline  
Old 15th Nov 2005, 14:49
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Germany
Posts: 175
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
from http://edition.cnn.com/2005/BUSINESS...eut/index.html

Boeing said the 747-8 would cost 20 percent less to operate per flight than the Airbus A380.
Do 5 flights and your costs are nil
the_hawk is offline  
Old 15th Nov 2005, 14:52
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Posts: 1,050
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
What about the 787 as well. Busy times at Boeing I guess!
Pin Head is offline  
Old 15th Nov 2005, 15:12
  #9 (permalink)  
Alba Gu Brath
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Merseyside
Age: 55
Posts: 738
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Didn't Boeing pour scorn over the A380 saying that the future was in smaller long range aircraft? So the justification for this behemoth is....
Big Tudor is offline  
Old 15th Nov 2005, 15:29
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Clarty Waters, UK
Age: 58
Posts: 950
Received 53 Likes on 29 Posts
And didn't Airbus claim that the future was in large scale hub to hub rather than thinner point to point operations? So the justification for the A350 is.......
Andy_S is offline  
Old 15th Nov 2005, 15:52
  #11 (permalink)  

ex-Tanker
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Luton Beds UK
Posts: 907
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Smile Stretched...

Well, they stretched the upper deck - but I guess that was a while ago!
Few Cloudy is offline  
Old 15th Nov 2005, 16:10
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Not quite Sure
Posts: 156
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Justification for the A350 is for the aircraft to be a more efficient version of the A330....
kooyheier is offline  
Old 15th Nov 2005, 16:24
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Teesside, UK
Age: 33
Posts: 1,100
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Justification for A350?

Point - Hub - A350
Hub - Hub - A380
Hub - Point - A350



mmeteesside
mmeteesside is offline  
Old 15th Nov 2005, 16:29
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: SEA (or better PAE)
Posts: 215
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I guess good justification for both Boeing and Airbus is that they have to match the other one.

So there was no way for Boeing to let the A380 go through alone withthe same holding for A350.

They are all good a/cs just a question of marketing and salesmanship will get the better of them.

Good for contractors / jobshoppers of all kinds
Grunf is offline  
Old 15th Nov 2005, 16:48
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: London,England
Posts: 1,388
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Stretched by 3.6m and 34 more seats, wow, really cutting edge stuff.
Max Angle is offline  
Old 15th Nov 2005, 18:09
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: Dublin, Ireland
Posts: 1,879
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Talking

747-300 = 743, 747-400 = 744. So, new nickname for the new Jumbo:

Budgie?

It did surprise me that the capacity expansion was so small, but already, BA seems to have warmed to the new 747, saying there were many unanswered questions about the 380.

As for other carriers: JAL, Cathay, ANZ (which has said it would order it if it were launched), CAL, SAA ?

Wonder if any M/E carriers would be interested? Saudia, perhaps, or one of the newer carriers, like QR/EY/EK?
akerosid is offline  
Old 15th Nov 2005, 18:16
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Dallas, TX USA
Posts: 739
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
If some airline requested a passenger 748 with a stretch of 5.6m instead of 3.6m (thus adding a few more seats), and the freighter is certified to that length anyway, would Boeing turn them down?
Flight Safety is offline  
Old 15th Nov 2005, 20:07
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 25
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
AND 21% more cargo volume...bags always limited cargo...
AND 8% less per seat mile...
AND 22% lower trip costs than the A380...
AND 8000 nm range...
AND B787/777 technology...

74 HEAVEN
PODKNOCKER is offline  
Old 15th Nov 2005, 20:53
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Dallas, TX USA
Posts: 739
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
There's an interesting article in the Seattle Times about the new plane, and potential customers.

Seattle Times article
Flight Safety is offline  
Old 16th Nov 2005, 07:43
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Next to Bay 8
Posts: 247
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Sometimes evolution is better than revolution. There is a LONG list of airlines that will need 747/744 replacements before long and with 777/787 technology onboard, it should prove popular. It's not as if airlines can fly 744s forever and A380s have proven too big a risk for many. It will sell in my very humble opinion.
OhForSure is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.