Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Non-Airline Forums > Space Flight and Operations
Reload this Page >

It's Back! Voyager Is Making Sense Again After Months of Gibberish

Wikiposts
Search
Space Flight and Operations News and Issues Following Space Flight, Testing, Operations and Professional Development

It's Back! Voyager Is Making Sense Again After Months of Gibberish

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 30th Apr 2024, 09:09
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: Budapest
Posts: 322
Received 254 Likes on 152 Posts

Expatrick is online now  
Old 30th Apr 2024, 11:52
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: Central UK
Posts: 1,650
Received 144 Likes on 70 Posts
The notion of 'giving ourselves away' to potentially hostile aliens by Voyager is whimsicalin the extreme to say the least.
Any civilsation capable of intercepting it would be able work out its origin via its trajectory in a trice and the notion that we are somehow hidden by the vastness of space is utterly unrealistic given the vast amounts of RF energy we've been spreading about the galaxy this last century and more - Voyager is currently only a few light hours distant but our detectable RF energy front is at least 60 light years away and extending spherically what? thousands of times faster than the infinitessinmaly small single point-in-space Voyager which is crawling along in a single direction. We're lit up in space like a vast radio beacon to any civilisation capable of detecting radio energy to a level only as advanced as ours is today, let alone one hundreds of years more advanced. Our RF output since the cold war is thought to remain detectable out to hundreds of light years (given time for it to actually get that distant)
We have certainly broadcast our existence and location to a readily detectable level over some 60 light years distance in all directions, internet figures for number of stars by range varly wildly but 600 seems about the consensus for within 60LY and anything from 13,000 to 60,000 within 100LY, and same again for 100-200.
We're lit up like a christmas tree for anyone inside our RF propagation sphere who cares to look.

Last edited by meleagertoo; 30th Apr 2024 at 12:28.
meleagertoo is offline  
Old 30th Apr 2024, 12:36
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: UK
Age: 59
Posts: 3,528
Received 209 Likes on 117 Posts
... Assuming someone is there to hear it.
But that's for another thread.
TURIN is offline  
Old 30th Apr 2024, 14:52
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: sussex
Posts: 114
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
... Assuming someone is there to hear it.
Ask God - she knows.
42go is offline  
Old 30th Apr 2024, 19:41
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2019
Location: in the sky
Posts: 158
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by Tarq57
Space is big. Really big. You may think it's a long way down the road to the shops, but that's nothing compared to space.
Well at least it wasn't built by the Sirius Cybernetics Corp
Brian Pern is online now  
Old 1st May 2024, 14:48
  #26 (permalink)  
See and avoid
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: USA
Posts: 691
Received 57 Likes on 27 Posts
Voyager 2 probably started spouting gibberish because part of one of its chips was hit by a cosmic ray/particle of some sort. Mind you, integrated silicon chips were much bigger then, nothing as tiny as what’s available on microcircuits now, so if they had a modern chip with far more condensed into a smaller area, that single incident could have trashed everything not just a small part of the chip..

Newer is not always better, and that should be included in future plans. That and redundancy, redundancy, redundancy.

They recovered operations by slowly shifting the work load to other chips on board which are still functioning.

Earth’s magnetosphere/the van Allen belt protects life on earth by diverting most of these cosmic particles towards the poles, where they produce the aurora borealis.

If you hop on a spaceship to Mars, you leave much of this convenient protective layer behind, so will be subject to much more because Mars doesn’t have anything similar.

https://www.nasa.gov/solar-system/pl...torms-at-mars/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magnetic_field_of_Mars
visibility3miles is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.