Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > PPRuNe Worldwide > South Asia and the Far East
Reload this Page >

SIA and premature command promotions?

Wikiposts
Search
South Asia and the Far East News and views on the fast growing and changing aviation scene on the planet.

SIA and premature command promotions?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 16th Jul 2016, 04:54
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Brisbane Australia
Posts: 35
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
SIA and premature command promotions?

Possibly only third hand rumours so in no way am I suggesting it is true but ..........

From a couple of mates still flying with them, there appears to be some concern that with the loss of the vast majority of expatriate Captains, there is a rush by management to promote many inexperienced and somewhat junior First Officers into the left hand seat!

This is often sour grapes from those Skippers who had to "move on" but maybe someone can clarify this thanks?
RetiredTooEarly is offline  
Old 16th Jul 2016, 13:43
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: The lion city
Posts: 368
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Not true! Presently it is about 11-12 years to command!
etops777 is offline  
Old 17th Jul 2016, 12:47
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Hkg
Posts: 233
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Total hog wash.
wonderland is offline  
Old 23rd Jul 2016, 07:33
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: 1 degree north
Age: 39
Posts: 593
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
haha, what rubbish rumour

12yrs for local guys
Stallone is offline  
Old 23rd Jul 2016, 15:18
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: The lion city
Posts: 368
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Stallone
haha, what rubbish rumour

12yrs for local guys
Stallone

Do you work for the airline? Don't think so..
etops777 is offline  
Old 27th Jul 2016, 04:22
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Sector C
Posts: 78
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Spending a career as an FO on the 744 and A380 an SQ FO would be lucky to average one pilot flying sector a month over 12 years.

To expect any person to be able to handle an aircraft to certified limits, with degraded systems, and poor conditions with this level of inexperience is a recipe for disaster.

Despite logging thousands of hours in the cruise, they would be lucky to have hand flown the aircraft for 3 hours over a dozen years.
Eyes only is offline  
Old 27th Jul 2016, 13:19
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: nowhere
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Don't they have a bunch of short/medium haul flights on heavily travelled routed in the local area. Maybe Jakarta, HKG, etc for the big planes as well. Some companies do.

Do the new guys start out on the smaller planes and then move up or straight onto the ULH aircraft sometimes.
JammedStab is offline  
Old 30th Jul 2016, 02:32
  #8 (permalink)  
Nemo Me Impune Lacessit
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Derbyshire, England.
Posts: 4,091
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
An FO on the B747-400 freighter should do better than 1 sector a month. Due to high ZFW, common in freight ops. most of the sectors are nine hours or less, average three trips per month should yield between three and six sectors a month.


No idea about the A380. In the days of the A310 an FO could build hours and handling sectors quite fast.
parabellum is offline  
Old 2nd Aug 2016, 09:04
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Hong Kong
Posts: 47
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Interesting reading above. What's SQ policy of continuing approaches after advisement from tower of microbursts? SQ was the 'only' aircraft brave (?) enough to attempt an approach into VHHH this morning in the aftermath of a T8. Was advised twice by TWR of microbursts whilst on the ILS. Continued the approach anyway until he experienced the bleeding obvious. Been a while since I've heard such an agitated voice on the radio when he advised tower of the missed approach.
Weary traveller is offline  
Old 3rd Aug 2016, 15:07
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: in denial
Posts: 293
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Weary,

Not wanting to contribute to the criticism of SQ here, but I too have to question why anyone would even attempt an approach with a MINUS 50 kt microburst alert on the ATIS. I watched in amazement as SQ1 shot their approach on Flightradar24, particularly with CX/KA having cancelled all ops.

VS
Veruka Salt is offline  
Old 13th Aug 2016, 19:38
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Far East
Posts: 81
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Well I remember a time when an SQ f/o doing command ck on a 2 eng varient they operate asked me what I would do in the situation he was given in a penultimate command check ride........after take off eng low oil pressure leading to QRH eng shut down. Then other eng Fire warning so followed QRH = Eng shut down. What would you do? Try Eng relight on Oil pressure eng asap !!!!!
His response and subsequent Fail...............glide to available airfield. 10 yrs in long haul means diddly squat if your not trained properly by your airline !!!!!!
wisecaptain is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.