Wikiposts
Search
South Asia and the Far East News and views on the fast growing and changing aviation scene on the planet.

Q400 operators

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 23rd Sep 2013, 19:34
  #1 (permalink)  

Whatever happens,.. happens!
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: 19' N, 82' W
Posts: 360
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Q400 operators

Hello fellow Aviators;

I am looking for operational information on the Q400.

If you are or have operated or dispatched a Q400 recently I would very much like to pump you for real life info.

In particular I'd like to establish performance data but, I am reluctant to use Manufacturers sales pitch info.

I'd like to know real TAS, alt. capability, fuel burn etc. I anyone has access to a simplified Flight planning graph or software I would really appreciate it

I'm operating in a tropical climate, shortest sector about 100nm, longest 800nm with most falling around 3 - 600nm.

Compensation is offered in Beer, Rum, Jerk Chicken or Marinated Conch currency

Thanks
fluf
flufdriver is offline  
Old 23rd Sep 2013, 19:51
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: FL510
Posts: 910
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The Q400 performes quite well, not behind the book figures normally.
Only problem is it stinks! And fails every once in a while (read: one per week).
My current outfit is desperately trying to get rid of them, would rather take ATR!

Last edited by safelife; 23rd Sep 2013 at 19:52.
safelife is offline  
Old 24th Sep 2013, 08:53
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Colchester
Age: 40
Posts: 454
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Q400 operators

We have a god dispatch rate (fantastic technicians), at MTOM FL250 is possible with about 330TAS/M.5.

There's no harm trusting in BBD's figures about the machine.
Dash8driver1312 is offline  
Old 27th Sep 2013, 16:13
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Austria
Posts: 706
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
Dash8Driver is correct.

Just a little addition: of course, performance is a bit dependent on temperature. While I have never had to reject the intention to climb to FL250 yet, high OATs tend to make the last 2-3000ft a chore.

With regards to fuel consumption: at maximum cruise rating and FL250, expect around 330-360kTAS (weight and OAT dependent) and a fuel flow of 2500lbs/h. In case of no performance limits on departure or landing, MZFM allows for 6930lbs of takeoff fuel, so assuming IFR reserves of 1800lbs, a distance of 600NAM should be well feasible; anything beyond that would require lessening the passenger load. Mind You, the MZFM of 57.000lbs is rather generously calculated and in my experience only limiting in case of a full pax load, much luggage plus some cargo - a full pax cabin without cargo will show a ZFM of around 55 to 56.000lbs typically in our operation, so the figures I estimated above are highly conservative. In case You like to calculate for Yourself, a ballpark DOM figure would be at 42.000lbs.
Tu.114 is offline  
Old 3rd Oct 2013, 21:29
  #5 (permalink)  

Whatever happens,.. happens!
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: 19' N, 82' W
Posts: 360
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thank you

Thanks all:

That is why I like to ask people with operational experience; you get the real scoop!

fluf
flufdriver is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.