PPRuNe Forums

Go Back   PPRuNe Forums > Wannabes Forums > South Asia and Far East Wannabes
Forgotten your Username/Password?


South Asia and Far East Wannabes A forum for those applying to Cathay Pacific, Dragonair or any other Hong Kong-based airline or operator. Use this area for both Direct Entry Pilot and Cadet-scheme queries.


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 3rd Sep 2012, 19:23   #1 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: SA
Posts: 20
Cathay B787 vs A350.

Hey Everyone,

I've been trying to find a reason on Google as to why Cathay chose the A350 over the 787. However with no luck, I've come here hoping for answers.
Sticky Fingers is offline   Reply
Old 3rd Sep 2012, 21:16   #2 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Island Paradise
Posts: 48
The fabulously compsensated elite genius managers who run our mob say the 787 is a "game changer". Guess what? It is too small and CX is not interested. The ones we are getting will have 36 Business class seats and 183 economy. No First class. This is how we are to compete across the Pacific with the likes of SQ, TG, NH, etc.
Koan is offline   Reply
Old 4th Sep 2012, 03:40   #3 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Polar Route
Posts: 556
I agree with the above post, but I don't think CX has completely shut the door on the possibility of 787-10s. It would be an excellent replacement for the A330s as a medium haul airplane to Oz, NZ, and the ME. It would also remove some risk from A350 delays and/or underperformance. Seeing as how it would be another type however, I doubt we will see it. The company would probably prefer to "intentionally mis-use" the long-haul A359/10s in this role. Time will tell...
cxorcist is online now   Reply
Old 4th Sep 2012, 05:07   #4 (permalink)
crwjerk
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Same endorsement on licence as 777 I believe. Will only be a couple of sims to operate it.
  Reply
Old 4th Sep 2012, 06:26   #5 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Polar Route
Posts: 556
Jerk,

I did not believe the common type at first, but, after researching, you are correct. Training to the 787 should just include a differences course and a few sectors. I think that strongly improves the case for the -10, especially since it has very similar engines to the 747-8. It makes me wish Boeing had gone with more of a 777/787 cockpit in the -8.
cxorcist is online now   Reply
Old 5th Sep 2012, 08:12   #6 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Hong Kong
Posts: 312
Quote:
as a 330/340 rated pilot its a easy answer simply A350 > B787 as is Airbus > Boeing
Oh, of course! Such exquisite simplicity - I don't know why I didn't see it sooner.

STP
Steve the Pirate is offline   Reply
 
 
This ad will disappear if you login
Reply
 


Thread Tools


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT. The time now is 07:34.


vBulletin® v3.8.7, Copyright ©2000-2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
SEO by vBSEO 3.6.1
© 1996-2012 The Professional Pilots Rumour Network

As these are anonymous forums the origins of the contributions may be opposite to what may be apparent. In fact the press may use it, or the unscrupulous, or sciolists*, to elicit certain reactions.

*"sciolist"... Noun, archaic. "a person who pretends to be knowledgeable and well informed".