PPRuNe Forums - Search Results

Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Search Forums
Reload this Page >

Search Results

Wikiposts
Search
Search: Posts Made By: dangermouse
Showing results 1 to 5 of 5
Search took 0.00 seconds.
Forum: Rotorheads
12th Feb 2011, 09:15
Replies: 1,141
Views: 340,545
Posted By dangermouse

reply to II

although not used for offshore in the civil world

EH101 has full 30 minute capability, 5000+ SHP

so it is possible

DM
Forum: Rotorheads
5th Nov 2010, 18:10
Replies: 1,141
Views: 340,545
Posted By dangermouse

wrong, wrong, wrong

The EH101 was civil certified WITH a 30 minute capability in 1994, (EH101-300 and -500 series aircraft) by the CAA, FAA and RAI.

This was amended in 1998 (?) for the -510 variant which the Tokyo...
Forum: Rotorheads
5th Nov 2010, 11:42
Replies: 1,141
Views: 340,545
Posted By dangermouse

again......

I.I the statement 'realistically impossible' statement is incorrect, the AW139 and EH101 prove it is possible and that the FAR requirement can be met in full.

A supplementary lubrication system...
Forum: Rotorheads
27th Aug 2010, 13:18
Replies: 1,141
Views: 340,545
Posted By dangermouse

for Eastwood

For clarity the requirement states that it must have 30 minutes dry run capability unless the likelihood of total oil loss was extremely improbable.

In the case of the S92 the safety case...
Forum: Rotorheads
17th Nov 2009, 10:22
Replies: 1,141
Views: 340,545
Posted By dangermouse

Category A cert

Just to clarify,

how can the S92 still be classed (still officially certified) as a Category A rotorcraft (which by definition it must be under JAR29 due to its weight) if the MGB lubrication...
Showing results 1 to 5 of 5


 
Forum Jump

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.