PPRuNe Forums - Search Results

Search: Posts Made By: N-Jacko

Showing results 1 to 4 of 4
Search took 0.00 seconds.

Forum: Private Flying

29th Jul 2015, 10:33

Replies: 38

500 and 1000 foot rule

Views: 10,056

Posted By N-Jacko

Good point, there aren't many. Megève perhaps...

Good point, there aren't many. Megève perhaps (but that's a licensed altiport). Valloire Bonnenuit is the only altisurface I can think of which has a town/settlement less than 1,000 ft below the...

Forum: Private Flying

28th Jul 2015, 23:30

Replies: 38

500 and 1000 foot rule

Views: 10,056

Posted By N-Jacko

The old CAA Rule 5 has gone and the new SERA...

The old CAA Rule 5 has gone and the new SERA wording has changed it to the effect that intention to land is all that is required. No longer "when landing..." but "necessary for landing".

A low...

Forum: Private Flying

28th Jul 2015, 19:58

Replies: 38

500 and 1000 foot rule

Views: 10,056

Posted By N-Jacko

... and consequently, to the extent that landing...

... and consequently, to the extent that landing (like birth, marriage and death) is a process rather than an event, it can't be necessary actually to touch down in order to benefit from the SERA "as...

Forum: Private Flying

28th Jul 2015, 16:55

Replies: 38

500 and 1000 foot rule

Views: 10,056

Posted By N-Jacko

I think that a reasonable case could be made that...

I think that a reasonable case could be made that a low pass may be "necessary" for landing at a private or non-radio site - not least because such a procedure is a required part of the flight test...

Showing results 1 to 4 of 4