PPRuNe Forums - Search Results

Search: Posts Made By: Lemper

Showing results 1 to 4 of 4
Search took 0.01 seconds.

Forum: Tech Log

30th Dec 2006, 09:18

Replies: 11

744 aft CG, lo weight T/O.

Views: 2,736

Posted By Lemper

Thanks John. Makes sense too. However, I wonder...

Thanks John. Makes sense too. However, I wonder if (some) company's SOP makers do read the AFM!

Forum: Tech Log

30th Dec 2006, 08:34

Replies: 11

744 aft CG, lo weight T/O.

Views: 2,736

Posted By Lemper

Thanks Phil. Comforting, as this is what I have...

Thanks Phil. Comforting, as this is what I have always thought too, however,
I still cannot figure out the rationale behind 1) IMPOSING a technique, whatever it is; [I believed from early english...

Forum: Tech Log

29th Dec 2006, 06:41

Replies: 11

744 aft CG, lo weight T/O.

Views: 2,736

Posted By Lemper

Makes sense...Thanks. Now, one operator on a...

Makes sense...Thanks. Now, one operator on a Faraway Island operates both PW and GE, same technique regardless of engine.
More opinions around?

Forum: Tech Log

28th Dec 2006, 10:42

Replies: 11

744 aft CG, lo weight T/O.

Views: 2,736

Posted By Lemper

744 aft CG, lo weight T/O.

I would like to have the opinionS of Big Lady Riders on this topic.
My fourth Airline on the type, and here is the hick-up:
Two of them IMPOSE, in their SOPs, a static T/O technique for LO WT AFT...

Showing results 1 to 4 of 4