PPRuNe Forums - Search Results

Search: Posts Made By: thing

Showing results 1 to 5 of 5
Search took 0.00 seconds.

Forum: Military Aviation

10th Jul 2014, 16:03

Replies: 185

Why do the RAF still use QFE?

Views: 36,209

Posted By thing

Just like my wife and her damned Radley handbags...

Just like my wife and her damned Radley handbags then.

Forum: Military Aviation

10th Jul 2014, 15:47

Replies: 185

Why do the RAF still use QFE?

Views: 36,209

Posted By thing

I don't think it's an issue of 'we'll continue to...

I don't think it's an issue of 'we'll continue to use it because we use it'. I have no problem using QFE, I use it virtually every time I fly. I have no problem driving on the right when I go to...

Forum: Military Aviation

10th Jul 2014, 07:03

Replies: 185

Why do the RAF still use QFE?

Views: 36,209

Posted By thing

Couldn't agree more so for the purposes of...

Couldn't agree more so for the purposes of simplicity why not stick to one datum? The argument for making ccts easier because you're flying 'round' numbers is nonsense really, if you can't add a...

Forum: Military Aviation

8th Jul 2014, 07:43

Replies: 185

Why do the RAF still use QFE?

Views: 36,209

Posted By thing

TA of course, I stand corrected by your...

TA of course, I stand corrected by your correction sir. Any idea how high it's proposed to be? I've heard mutterings of 6,000 but surely you would run into the same problem in the mountainy bits of...

Forum: Military Aviation

8th Jul 2014, 07:12

Replies: 185

Why do the RAF still use QFE?

Views: 36,209

Posted By thing

It's still 1013.2 Danny. I've no idea why the RAF...

It's still 1013.2 Danny. I've no idea why the RAF still use QFE either.

Don't know how transition levels et al were defined in your day but these days transition altitude is the altitude at or...

Showing results 1 to 5 of 5