PPRuNe Forums

Go Back   PPRuNe Forums > Ground & Other Ops Forums > Safety, CRM, QA & Emergency Response Planning
Forgotten your Username/Password?
PPRuNe Email Register FAQ Calendar Advertise Mark Forums Read

Safety, CRM, QA & Emergency Response Planning A wide ranging forum for issues facing Aviation Professionals and Academics


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10th October 2008, 21:27   #21 (permalink)
mikehammer
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: UK
Posts: 215
Quote:
A good leader needs to take the team with him, after all.
Yes...but if he thinks they are wrong because they are not making the decision from his vantage point (ie the whole issue of safety of the aircraft - factors which come into this are visible to the commander but not necessarily to the cabin staff), it is for him to decide on an overall view. I am not suggesting he discounts their (strong) views, moreover he must take them into account (must take a lot into account - everything in fact), but the whole point of a leader is having someone to decide. It's not yet a democracy in the world of CRM, nor should it become one.

mikehammer is offline  
Reply
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes


Posting Rules
vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Opinions cmxgap Cabin Crew 0 24th August 2003 06:30
BA-pilots' opinions, please! charlyvictor Rumours & News 6 22nd November 2001 21:58
BA-pilots' opinions, please! charlyvictor Questions 6 22nd November 2001 21:58
Airtours Fleet Replacement with Boeings - Opinions from pilots? LAVDUMPER Terms and Endearment 1 23rd February 2001 23:14
Calling all Easy pilots: Opinions about the 737-700 LAVDUMPER Tech Log 9 18th December 2000 19:01


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 23:00.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC7
© 1996-2008 The Professional Pilots Rumour Network

As these are anonymous forums the origins of the contributions may be opposite to what may be apparent. In fact the press may use it, or the unscrupulous, or sciolists*, to elicit certain reactions.

*"sciolist"... Noun, archaic. "a person who pretends to be knowledgeable and well informed".