PPRuNe Forums

Go Back   PPRuNe Forums > Ground & Other Ops Forums > Safety, CRM, QA & Emergency Response Planning
Forgotten your Username/Password?


Safety, CRM, QA & Emergency Response Planning A wide ranging forum for issues facing Aviation Professionals and Academics


Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools
Old 12th Feb 2003, 10:36   #1 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: LTN
Posts: 216
Single Engine Taxiing

What are your thoughts?
Safety? Fuel savings? Engine wear?
Anything helps.
Thanks,
GA
Go-Around is offline  
Old 12th Feb 2003, 13:09   #2 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: UTC +8
Posts: 2,491
Primarily fuel management. So as to expend no more than programmed taxi fuel. It's true especially when your'e No. 17, waiting 42 minutes in line for takeoff at JFK. But we never taxi a 4 engined jet on one motor.
GlueBall is offline  
Old 17th Feb 2003, 20:28   #3 (permalink)

Whatever happens,.. happens!
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: 19' N, 82' W
Posts: 351
We do it all the time, checklist is set up to cater for single engine taxi. Sop's call for turning into the running engine when coming to a stop, that allows you to turn away from it when starting to roll again, looks a little funny being stopped at an angle on the taxiway, but on a long taxi it can save a lot of fuel. So on our 737's we start #2 first, use both packs for A/C (iso valve closed) and then do a delayed engine start so as to allow the engine to run at idle for at least 2 minutes prior to T/O.
My personal limit is: T/O weight must be below 105000 lbs (124kmax) for single engine taxi, otherwise it takes too much power to start rolling.

What do you do?
flufdriver is offline  
Old 26th Feb 2003, 23:34   #4 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: Dubai, U.A.E.
Posts: 6
767 Driver
Don't even consider taxi out on one engine! Start fire problems with no groundcrew around?

However, taxi in on one is often used particuarly when light, but also in the Middle East to attempt to keep the brake temps lower and obviously reduce fuel consumption and tyre wear.
DICKUS is offline  
Old 28th Feb 2003, 19:55   #5 (permalink)

I'matightbastard
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,749
Wasn't there another thread on this?

I had to do it in a piston twin once. I guess it gets easier if you get some speed up, but I had to do a two seventy just to get off the runway so I'd rather not do it again if I didn't have to.
Onan the Clumsy is offline  
 
 
This ad will disappear if you login
Closed Thread
 


Thread Tools


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT. The time now is 23:32.


vBulletin® v3.8.7, Copyright ©2000-2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
SEO by vBSEO 3.6.1
© 1996-2012 The Professional Pilots Rumour Network

As these are anonymous forums the origins of the contributions may be opposite to what may be apparent. In fact the press may use it, or the unscrupulous, or sciolists*, to elicit certain reactions.

*"sciolist"... Noun, archaic. "a person who pretends to be knowledgeable and well informed".