Wikiposts
Search
Safety, CRM, QA & Emergency Response Planning A wide ranging forum for issues facing Aviation Professionals and Academics

Cabin crew ditches Captain.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 19th Feb 2015, 16:25
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 1,642
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
More here

Norwegian Tatl With Only 5 Cabin Crew — Civil Aviation Forum | Airliners.net
Mr Angry from Purley is offline  
Old 19th Feb 2015, 17:23
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 1999
Location: london
Posts: 53
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Be interesting to note whether the refuseniks were based in NY. Shouldn't be too long before this follows the previous thread to jetblast.
bigbird is offline  
Old 19th Feb 2015, 17:52
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 1999
Location: london
Posts: 53
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Under US regs, one flight attendant required for each 50 Pax. not seats, but actual souls. Number of Paxs divided by 50 equals nbr of flight attendants. 52 Paxs would require 2 FAs.
bigbird is offline  
Old 19th Feb 2015, 20:57
  #24 (permalink)  
I call you back
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Alpha quadrant
Posts: 355
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I can't speak for the B787 but while it is true to say that the CCM requirement is 1 per 50 and part thereof (e.g. 2 for 51 pax, 3 for 101 pax etc.) there is also usually an absolute minimum crew compliment for dispatch regardless of pax numbers (assuming it isn't empty).

As for the refuseniks, if they genuinely felt in danger then they were correct to leave the aircraft. However, assuming the absence of a specific violation to point to (e.g snow on the wings, out of hours etc), they immediately should seek a different career.

Calling the boss, and he most certainly is the boss, incompetent, unprofessional or reckless, requires a very good defence in any line of work. Accusing him/her of talking down to you, after you question his professional integrity, doesn't quite do it.
Faire d'income is offline  
Old 19th Feb 2015, 21:20
  #25 (permalink)  
RTO
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Scandinavia
Posts: 124
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Under US regs, one flight attendant required for each 50 Pax. not seats, but actual souls. Number of Paxs divided by 50 equals nbr of flight attendants. 52 Paxs would require 2 FAs.
Dont you think they would have to follow the regs of their own flag of convenience?
RTO is offline  
Old 19th Feb 2015, 21:26
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: I used to know
Posts: 175
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Surely the exact requirement depends the state of registration?
However all cabin crew /pax ratio I have come across relates to actual number of pax. As stated above 1 to 50.
Most aircraft and operators state a minimum number of cc. So anyone know what the policy of the operator is?

When it comes to things like security the cc are often in a hard place with the legal requirement to do it properly against company preasure for short turnarounds.

That said there are sadly a very small number who take great delight in doing very time consuming "thorough" searches for their own ends.

There is only one commander, he/she is not god but equally should be given the respect that that rank and position deserves. The line respect has to be earned has no place if this is the first time you have flown together. Suppose there is an issue just after you meet?
At this point we do not know the full story and I find it hard to belive that any captain would depart in this day and age with below minimum crewing.
Finally what did the FO have to say? If it was safety related I would have thought they would have had a vested intrest in raising concerns.
PT6Driver is offline  
Old 21st Feb 2015, 09:57
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: I wouldn't know.
Posts: 4,497
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
However all cabin crew /pax ratio I have come across relates to actual number of pax. As stated above 1 to 50.
You should check the current european legislation then, it is based on number of seats (among a number of other things), not passengers. Due to those other factors, operating with a reduced cabin crew might not lead to different allowable pax figures than the next lower number of cabin crew times 50.

However, i do not know if norway follows those rules as for example does switzerland.

ORO.CC.100 Number and composition of cabin crew

(a) The number and composition of cabin crew shall be determined in accordance with 7.a of Annex IV to Regulation (EC) No 216/2008, taking into account operational factors or circumstances of the particular flight to be operated. At least one cabin crew member shall be assigned for the operation of aircraft with an MOPSC of more than 19 when carrying one or more passenger(s).
(b) For the purpose of complying with (a), the minimum number of cabin crew shall be the greater of the following:
(1) the number of cabin crew members established during the aircraft certification process in accordance with the applicable certification specifications, for the aircraft cabin configuration used by the operator; or
(2) if the number under (1) has not been established, the number of cabin crew established during the aircraft certification process for the maximum certified passenger seating configuration reduced by 1 for every whole multiple of 50 passenger seats of the aircraft cabin configuration used by the operator falling below the maximum certified seating capacity; or
(3) one cabin crew member for every 50, or fraction of 50, passenger seats installed on the same deck of the aircraft to be operated.
(c) For operations where more than one cabin crew member is assigned, the operator shall nominate one cabin crew member to be responsible to the pilot-in-command/commander.

Last edited by Denti; 21st Feb 2015 at 10:08.
Denti is offline  
Old 24th Feb 2015, 12:24
  #28 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: flying by night
Posts: 500
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
For sure norwegian authorities are looking into this, they dont usually take reports about breaking rules lightly.
deptrai is offline  
Old 26th Feb 2015, 09:27
  #29 (permalink)  
RTO
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Scandinavia
Posts: 124
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
For sure norwegian authorities are looking into this, they dont usually take reports about breaking rules lightly.
Is that so? my impression is that you can bend an unlimited amount of aircraft without any more severe consequences than a shrug from NCAA. Anyway they can probably just do a O'leary and claim irish territory on the aircraft in question and everything in its proximity.
RTO is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.