Airport Crash Rescue Fire Fighters are not needed.
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Timbukthree
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Airport Crash Rescue Fire Fighters are not needed.
A review of aviation related fatalities of 2014, (or any year for that matter), and one could conclude that airport based emergency services are a near total waste of money. And it is a huge amount of money by the way...
In my 38-year career in aviation I have met, known and befriended over 24 airport based fire fighter/rescuers who, in their entire careers, have never actually rescued anyone.
I propose the elimination of all air-side based emergency services.
I do not eagerly await predictable, knee-jerk, emotional based responses.
I await rational, statistically supported responses.
In my 38-year career in aviation I have met, known and befriended over 24 airport based fire fighter/rescuers who, in their entire careers, have never actually rescued anyone.
I propose the elimination of all air-side based emergency services.
I do not eagerly await predictable, knee-jerk, emotional based responses.
I await rational, statistically supported responses.
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Luton
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I've never claimed on my car insurance in nearly 30 years of having a car, therefore I see no need for having car insurance in the future.
I've not died in over 50 years of living therefore I see no need for having life assurance in the future.
etc etc etc.
I've not died in over 50 years of living therefore I see no need for having life assurance in the future.
etc etc etc.
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Timbukthree
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
You pay directly for your insurance, and the premium is dependant upon several factors. You also have to pay a deductable fee before any benefit is paid. Insurance makes money for the Insurance Company and their shareholders. Airport fire fighters and the associated fire hall and equipment is a dead loss. Pun not intended.
I will disclose a secret: In the past decade a dozen airports with scheduled airline service have indeed eliminated their airport fire fighters, and most passengers, and even some pilots are not aware of this fact.
I will disclose a secret: In the past decade a dozen airports with scheduled airline service have indeed eliminated their airport fire fighters, and most passengers, and even some pilots are not aware of this fact.
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Midlands
Posts: 128
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I would be interested in seeing where the airports are that have closed their Fire Stations. Whilst it would not be too difficult for city airports to do this as some resources are close by, they would still need to factor in the cost to be imposed on the civvy side to provide the extra specialist equipment. More rural airports would be another thing all together as there are no practical support structures in place to start with.
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: United Kingdom
Age: 39
Posts: 700
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
It's all well and good saying you can use fire crews based in the city, but what happens when there's a major incident in the city? Who will then fight the fire when someone runs off the end of a runway?
When fire crews attend an incident at an airport now the airport shuts as the rescue services are already occupied with another incident even tough runways may be clear. Are you suggesting airports shut every time the city based fire crews are out on a call?
Furthermore they are all first aid trained and have some equipment to help until ambulance crews arrive - which in the few times a flight I have been on the fire crews were there in minutes, the ambulance a lot longer - 15 minutes recently.
When fire crews attend an incident at an airport now the airport shuts as the rescue services are already occupied with another incident even tough runways may be clear. Are you suggesting airports shut every time the city based fire crews are out on a call?
Furthermore they are all first aid trained and have some equipment to help until ambulance crews arrive - which in the few times a flight I have been on the fire crews were there in minutes, the ambulance a lot longer - 15 minutes recently.
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Midlands
Posts: 128
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Major UK cities outside London can now only handle 1 large incident at a time, I suppose you could have a service manned by the baggage handlers and cleaners as long as they were allowed to finish their duties before attending the call.
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Up high
Posts: 555
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
In Europe most arilines require a minimum fire cover before operating into an airport. Notams publish any reductions in fire cover, if such cover is reduced bellow a minimum you are not allowed to use that ariport and need to divert or not depart.
If fire cover was reduced or eliminated pilots would know because it would be published, pax would know because there would be no flight.
If fire cover was reduced or eliminated pilots would know because it would be published, pax would know because there would be no flight.
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Midlands
Posts: 340
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I know of 2 incidents within the last 18 months at ONE airport where the presence of an on-site ARFF meant that an incident never developed to the point of the authorities being formally notified. Their presence meant that no formal report was required. One incident would have, without a doubt, caused the loss of 12 lives, the other prevented 180 lives being put at risk.
But they never made the news or the reports because the on-site ARFF crews prevented it from developing. Had they had to wait for municipal crews lives would definitely have been lost in one incident and could have been lost in the second.
But they never made the news or the reports because the on-site ARFF crews prevented it from developing. Had they had to wait for municipal crews lives would definitely have been lost in one incident and could have been lost in the second.
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Midlands
Posts: 340
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
You're in the UK Midlands?? Interesting, so 'the authorities being formally notified' means no MOR was filed?*
Please do share more info on the incidents or the reasons that no-one involved submitted an MOR.
Please do share more info on the incidents or the reasons that no-one involved submitted an MOR.
In the first case the presence of ARFF meant a problem was observed, identified, contained and dealt with as a engineering issue before it snowballed into something much much worse.
The second was a case of unexpected issue only being identified once the aircraft was on stand.
But it misses the point. My point is that you're looking at fatality stats. Though even if you looked at accident stats the figures are still skewed because they completely miss every incident where the presence of ARFF prevented the incident becoming a statistic. For example I know fire crews who responded to a galley oven fire and extinguished it before it spread beyond the oven - that wont appear on accident statistics or fatality statistics but it would have done if the ARFF weren't there to respond.
Or the Heathrow 787, though it is listed as an accident. The presence of on-site ARFF meant the aircraft wasn't a hull loss and the fire was entirely contained within the fuselage.
Or the Heathrow BA777 that crash landed on 27L undershoot back in 2008, ARFF presence prevented the situation worsening and allowed for the rescue of those injured trapped onboard.
Or the SFO 777 crash where (although they unfortunately caused one death) them being onsite meant that the fires were quickly controlled.
Or the Kegworth disaster where the ARFF being onsite meant they were pulling people out of the fuselage before it was consumed by fire.
The ARFFs really do provide a vital service that it would be folly to remove.
Last edited by Burnie5204; 25th Jan 2015 at 21:47.
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Wherever I go, there I am
Age: 43
Posts: 804
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
If I were so inclined, I would have a look at what else ARFF does on an airport other than waiting for an aircraft to crash. Most international airports are small cities in their own right and much like an inner-city department, the airport fire department would respond to calls in the terminal not directly related to aircraft operations.
While true that they may never respond to an aircraft accident, they certainly save lives in the terminal and support buildings that would otherwise be lost to things like heart attacks, choking on that last French fry, or responding to a fire in the baggage area caused by the idiot who decided fireworks were a good idea to check.
Not exactly a waste of money in my mind.
While true that they may never respond to an aircraft accident, they certainly save lives in the terminal and support buildings that would otherwise be lost to things like heart attacks, choking on that last French fry, or responding to a fire in the baggage area caused by the idiot who decided fireworks were a good idea to check.
Not exactly a waste of money in my mind.
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: England
Posts: 1,008
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The RFF team at my airport are used for almost everything, they're usually the first on scene to any medical emergency and I've witnessed them save lives first hand.
Not sure I'd fancy being on an aircraft that's just had a large fuel leak on stand (or anywhere else on the airport for that matter) with no RFF based
Not sure I'd fancy being on an aircraft that's just had a large fuel leak on stand (or anywhere else on the airport for that matter) with no RFF based
