Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Ground & Other Ops Forums > Safety, CRM, QA & Emergency Response Planning
Reload this Page >

More evidence of leathal cockpit fumes harming pilots.

Wikiposts
Search
Safety, CRM, QA & Emergency Response Planning A wide ranging forum for issues facing Aviation Professionals and Academics

More evidence of leathal cockpit fumes harming pilots.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 15th Sep 2014, 06:12
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: UK
Posts: 441
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
More evidence of leathal cockpit fumes harming pilots.

Don't worry folks, it won't happen to you....!

http://www.private-eye.co.uk/section...ack&issue=1374

Last edited by Boeing 7E7; 15th Sep 2014 at 07:38.
Boeing 7E7 is online now  
Old 15th Sep 2014, 06:24
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 1998
Location: ...second left, past the lights.
Posts: 1,101
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
See other previous threads on this topic, with in depth studies and more, under this section or Downunder.
Search function (top right) will help.
Chocks Away is offline  
Old 15th Sep 2014, 07:26
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: In the Circuit
Age: 36
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
That link doesn't do much for me anyway mind, it takes me to Mediaballs
Heffalump363 is offline  
Old 15th Sep 2014, 07:37
  #4 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: UK
Posts: 441
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
See if this one works.

Private Eye In The Back: Pilot study
Boeing 7E7 is online now  
Old 15th Sep 2014, 11:31
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: lancs.UK
Age: 77
Posts: 1,191
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
My crystal ball tells me, the fat-cats who are attempting to keep a lid on this scandal, will take their pensions /golden goodbyes and whatever else they can rape from the industry parties involved......they will then leg it, leaving the claimants to fight over an empty, bankrupt carcass.
Yes, I see a total whitewash, the manufacturing and service industry jobs will be transferred to "phoenix" Companies, the victims *might* get some token compensation from a Government Quango, the fat-cats will be exonerated and "lessons will be learned" (while they gloat over their ill-gotten gains)
cockney steve is offline  
Old 15th Sep 2014, 11:37
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Hampshire
Age: 78
Posts: 211
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
There are far more than you think.The Pilots interviewed in the Ex BA Pilot's Professionally made Film "Welcome to Toxic Airlines",are now mostly no longer with us!Just look at Aerotoxic.org website and you will see.
If you ignore these facts you have you head up your !!
FAStoat is offline  
Old 15th Sep 2014, 13:07
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: flyover country USA
Age: 82
Posts: 4,579
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
More scientific research has uncovered the curious correlation of "death" being preceded by a long period of "life", the latter sometimes dragging on for several decades.

But statisticians remind us that "correlation is not causation".
barit1 is offline  
Old 16th Sep 2014, 07:27
  #8 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: UK
Posts: 441
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Barit1,
What an unhelpful and irrelevant reply to what appears to be a serious issue. What are your motivations in seeking to undermine?
Boeing 7E7 is online now  
Old 16th Sep 2014, 07:54
  #9 (permalink)  
Per Ardua ad Astraeus
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 18,579
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Ignorance, in a word.
BOAC is offline  
Old 16th Sep 2014, 08:10
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: FUBAR
Posts: 3,348
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Welcome Aboard Toxic Airlines (2007) - IMDb



Am I right in saying that a large percentage of these problems are B757 related ?
captplaystation is offline  
Old 16th Sep 2014, 10:53
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: .
Posts: 309
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Am I right in saying that a large percentage of these problems are B757 related ?
It must be somehow aircraft limited. I often fly for fieldwork with a large number of air quality sensors and, when allowed, I switch them on during the flight. None of them have ever detected any significant quantity of the contaminants mentioned on the aerotoxic website. Most of the time they detect cleaner air than they do on the ground in a (relatively) unpolluted city.
But I only ever fly on 747s, 777s and A330s so the problem must be limited to other types.
Nemrytter is offline  
Old 16th Sep 2014, 12:52
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Florida and wherever my laptop is
Posts: 1,350
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by captplaystation
Welcome Aboard Toxic Airlines (2007) - IMDb

Am I right in saying that a large percentage of these problems are B757 related ?
It may be engine type related. All those aircraft that use compressor air bleeds for pressurization/heating take the air as it comes from that engine. It may be a worthwhile exercise to check on the engine type and manufacturer. There were LOTS of complaints about cabin air quality on the 146 (do an internet search on: BAE 146 cabin air quality ) If you take air from an engine and it is lubricated with 'total loss' lubrication system then you WILL get hot oil vapour into the cabin. Each engine type and each engine of each type will be slightly different.

Seems the only way to avoid the problem is to use a separate air compressor and not take air from the engines; as is done now in the 787.
Ian W is offline  
Old 16th Sep 2014, 13:11
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Lemonia. Best Greek in the world
Posts: 1,759
Received 6 Likes on 3 Posts
Hazy memory. Didn't someone add up the "issues" reported, back in about 2006, and suggest that 146's and 757's were the main causes of this "alleged" issue?
Ancient Observer is offline  
Old 16th Sep 2014, 22:24
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: flyover country USA
Age: 82
Posts: 4,579
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Ian W:
Seems the only way to avoid the problem is to use a separate air compressor and not take air from the engines; as is done now in the 787.
...and was done on early jets, 707, DC-8 (pre-70 series), likely British & French as well.
barit1 is offline  
Old 28th Sep 2014, 15:33
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: flyover country USA
Age: 82
Posts: 4,579
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Some notes from an old TWA FE who knew the early 707 well:

The 707/727/DC-8 were certificated under CAR 4b which was the legacy of 20+ years of piston transport experience - service difficulties, accident investigations, etc. It specified that no direct route for engine air (such as supercharger discharge, etc.) was to be used for cabin pressurization. Recips used gear-driven compressors on the accy section exclusively for cabin air.

Thus early jets under CAR 4b had turbocompressors - evident on 707 inboard nacelles as an extra scoop at 12 o'clock. Some ships also had one on an outboard nacelle. Similar to a turbosupercharger, they used engine bleed air to drive it, and had a separate compressor wheel to pressurize the cabin with clean air.

But in the mid-60s, when FAR25 came along as a cert basis, bleed air could be taken directly from the engine compressor for cabin pressurization.

barit1 is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.