PPRuNe Forums

Go Back   PPRuNe Forums > Ground & Other Ops Forums > Safety, CRM, QA & Emergency Response Planning
Forgotten your Username/Password?


Safety, CRM, QA & Emergency Response Planning A wide ranging forum for issues facing Aviation Professionals and Academics


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 20th Jan 2012, 08:53   #1 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 925
Excess reliance on automation - the old story again

Recent happenings to the cruise ship Costa Concordia revealed that despite the availability of a fistful of wonderful aids to navigation the captain still found himself literally between rocks and a hard place.

The letter below to the editor of an Australian newspaper could equally apply to the constant drive to ever increasing reliance on automation in airliners.
Quote:
"Technology should be seen as an adjunct to common sense or learned intelligence, not an alternative.
With the sinking of the Costa Concordia perhaps, as a start, we really do need to take calculators out of primary school classrooms".
Tee Emm is offline   Reply
Old 20th Jan 2012, 20:28   #2 (permalink)
Nemo Me Impune Lacessit
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Victoria, Australia.
Posts: 2,784
Strangely enough there was a story in yesterdays papers that the Captain had 'dumped' the automatics and was 'hand flying' the ship! Certainly agree about the calculators, we used to get mental arithmetic tests just about every week.
parabellum is offline   Reply
Old 20th Jan 2012, 20:51   #3 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: In some hotel downroute or in some hotel doing union negotiations.
Posts: 2,367
And the rock he hit wasn't on the map. I wouldn't lump that in with the issue of automatic vs. manual flight, as the nautical world works a bit differently than ours.
Denti is offline   Reply
Old 21st Jan 2012, 01:13   #4 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Sale, Australia
Age: 69
Posts: 3,429
Quote:
And the rock he hit wasn't on the map
Denti, have a look at the very good thread running on Jetblast. Wasn't just a rock he hit, it was a charted island.
Brian Abraham is online now   Reply
Old 22nd Jan 2012, 23:07   #5 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: schermoney and left front seat
Age: 46
Posts: 1,512
Funnily enough my boss told me today that he is near the place for holidays since almost 30 years. he said whenever he rents a boat there, he had to sign a paper stating that he is not allowed closer to Giglio than 500m because of rocks under water close to the surface.

He insisted that he never rented a cruise ship, but plastic made boats with 10-12 hp outboard motors.

Not on the map? Please.....

BTW, I promised him if I`d ever hit a rock and the aircraft is in danger of sinking, that I would leave the wreck last. Also promised him never to fly very low around Giglio.

Canīt work out why he looked at me as if I wore a funny hat.
His dudeness is offline   Reply
Old 24th Jan 2012, 10:56   #6 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Inside the M25
Posts: 881
Quote:
ever increasing reliance on automation in airliners
If automation means that the pilots have more spare capacity for situational awareness, then that's a good thing. It's only a problem if it means that they think they can take no notice of what's happening around them. But if they think that way, then they are the problem, not the automation.
Young Paul is offline   Reply
Old 30th Jan 2012, 21:31   #7 (permalink)


Probationary PPRuNer
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: USA
Age: 39
Posts: 1
This topic comes up often in our flight department. Some of our pilots feel hand flying is essential all the time (except cruise). Other pilots feel that the Autopilot should be used as much as possible to reduce workload and improve situational awareness.

I am currently tasked with developing SOPs and am trying to decide what policy would be best.

Is there anyone who could share what their company says on the subject or what the SOPs are at other flight departments or airlines.

It would be very helpful in being able to say that 90% (or whatever) of flight departments and airlines follow use "this" autopilot philosophy which is why we implemented this SOP. BTW, we fly the very highly automated Gulfstream G550.

Thank you.
JetPilot500 is offline   Reply
Old 1st Feb 2012, 12:37   #8 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Australia
Posts: 2,260
Quote:
I am currently tasked with developing SOPs and am trying to decide what policy would be best.
There is a mountain of links to research papers and opinions if you scan through PPRuNe contributions. Everyone has an opinion. It is known that excessive reliance on automation eventually results in gradual loss of flying skills.

If you are happy for your crews to go down that path then fill your boots with more accent on automation. Make sure you read the individual history of loss of control in IMC accidents also to be found on PPRuNe and then form your own opinion remembering your crews will be a captive audience to your personal preference.
Centaurus is offline   Reply
Old 2nd Feb 2012, 10:12   #9 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: home and abroad
Posts: 533
I like to handfly, but at times it is so much easier to let the automatics do the hard work.

I don't fly air transport anymore, besides my wings rotate over the top of the fuselage, but in my air transport days there was always an emphasis on handflying proficiency, as wel as the need to know how to use the automatices.
However, automatics took second place; when in doubt everybody could handfly the machines with precision and not be fooled by the automation. But those who understood the automatics knew how to offload themselves in times of high workload and got the best of both worlds.

Situation awareness is the key.

Hope this helps.
S76Heavy is offline   Reply
 
 
This ad will disappear if you login
Reply
 


Thread Tools


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT. The time now is 00:31.


vBulletin® v3.8.7, Copyright ©2000-2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
SEO by vBSEO 3.6.1
Đ 1996-2012 The Professional Pilots Rumour Network

As these are anonymous forums the origins of the contributions may be opposite to what may be apparent. In fact the press may use it, or the unscrupulous, or sciolists*, to elicit certain reactions.

*"sciolist"... Noun, archaic. "a person who pretends to be knowledgeable and well informed".