PPRuNe Forums

Go Back   PPRuNe Forums > Ground & Other Ops Forums > Safety, CRM, QA & Emergency Response Planning
Forgotten your Username/Password?


Safety, CRM, QA & Emergency Response Planning A wide ranging forum for issues facing Aviation Professionals and Academics


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 12th Dec 2011, 12:10   #1 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Poland
Posts: 30
ERP for Handling

Have anyone seen something like ERP for Ground Service Provider? If so, please advise on what basis is it built (structure, topics, etc.). Is it common to ICAO SMM ?
Creasy is offline   Reply
Old 13th Dec 2011, 19:21   #2 (permalink)
Spitoon
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
I'm afraid I can't help - I haven't seen an ERP for ground handling operations. I would expect the detail to be very specific to the services provided and to the environment you operate in. In some respects I would even expect the ERP to be developed by the airport operator and the handling company's part to be detailed there.

FWIW, I would expect the structure to contain
  • a clear scope for the plan,
  • the triggers/initiators to put the plan in action,
  • clear decision-making responsibilities and authority, and
  • detailed procedures for the events covered - including checklists and notification etc.

It's not really going to follow the structure of a SMM but is going to form part of an effective SMS. The SMM should explain how the ERP is developed and maintained - who is responsible, who must be involved and so on, and how often (or when) it is reviewed. The SMS should also identify training needs for everyone involved and ensure the necessary competence is maintained.

Like all of these SMS things, it's mainly common sense and not rocket science....despite what the 'experts' would like us to believe about their field.
  Reply
Old 21st Dec 2011, 10:15   #3 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Poland
Posts: 30
My asking was to find if safety specialists in different GSPs built their ERP like we do - if built.

As for the papers It should be Airport's responsibility to deal with it, unfortunately airports often forget what is the most imopratant thing in Contingency Planning - not only passengers but their families that await in the terminal.
Creasy is offline   Reply
Old 5th Jan 2012, 10:13   #4 (permalink)
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 35
Creasy,

The ISAGO standards require an accredited ground handler to have an Emergency Response Plan however doesn't provide a lot in the guidance material as to what it should comprise. What it does allow however is recognition of the airport or operator ERP and for the ground handler to point to that.

One aspect of this question is does it relate to an emergency within the ground handler itself, or the ground handler assisting in the response to an operator/airport incident.

Ground handlers I have seen don't do so well at the former, and their strength at the latter depends on the level of training and exercise training from the airport/operator.
737opsguy is offline   Reply
Old 8th Jan 2012, 02:06   #5 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: BC
Posts: 258
ERP for GHA....

Not an ICAO requirement or EU OPS, although your local airport authorities may want you to have one. Your local NAA may require you to have one of theirs or the operators that you may work.

In any case, if you're looking: Air Operator Certification, Compliance, Oversight, Audits, can produce it.
777AV8R is offline   Reply
 
 
This ad will disappear if you login
Reply
 


Thread Tools


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT. The time now is 08:11.


vBulletin® v3.8.7, Copyright ©2000-2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
SEO by vBSEO 3.6.1
© 1996-2012 The Professional Pilots Rumour Network

As these are anonymous forums the origins of the contributions may be opposite to what may be apparent. In fact the press may use it, or the unscrupulous, or sciolists*, to elicit certain reactions.

*"sciolist"... Noun, archaic. "a person who pretends to be knowledgeable and well informed".