PPRuNe Forums

Go Back   PPRuNe Forums > Ground & Other Ops Forums > Safety, CRM, QA & Emergency Response Planning
Forgotten your Username/Password?


Safety, CRM, QA & Emergency Response Planning A wide ranging forum for issues facing Aviation Professionals and Academics


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 18th Oct 2011, 17:27   #1 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Wales
Posts: 85
Safety issues on remote airfield flying

I'm working with an organisation dedicated to essential/humanitarian/ emergency aviation. We are trying to work on high-level policies that can improve safety and sustainability in this sector. What do you think the main issues are?

To concentrate your minds, over the past few weeks, more people died in the remote aviation sector than in the war in Afghanistan.
PeterP is offline   Reply
Old 18th Oct 2011, 20:49   #2 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Wor Yerm
Age: 57
Posts: 1,942
Use well paid, properly trained, experienced pilots flying well maintained, high powered single engined turbine aircraft. Don't criticise the pilots when they return with an uncompleted mission and don't expect them to fly when the weather is bad. But I have to be honest - phrases like "high-level policies", "safety and sustainability in this sector" and "the main issues" scare me fartless. I could be wrong but these are words associated with parish council box ticking PC organisations type who have a slender grasp of reality.

Best of luck,

PM

Last edited by Piltdown Man; 31st Oct 2011 at 22:19. Reason: deletion of a word
Piltdown Man is offline   Reply
Old 18th Oct 2011, 21:56   #3 (permalink)

 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 10,333
(1) Quality of people, maintained and continuously improved through training, experience, rest, retention and good CRM. Quality determined by ability to do the job - not religious or political affiliation or willingness to work for peanuts.

(2) Quality of information available to those good people, if necessarily maintained in-house with direct access of crews to the information providers. This covers sites, aircraft, met, local operating restrictions...

(3) Acceptance of captain's decision if it's not as demanded by mission requirements. Measures to assure crews that if their non-delivery fails a humanitarian need, there will be follow-ups ASAP so the mission still happens, safely, eventually.

(4) Minimisation of daft management jargon

(5) Management spending enough time at the operational end that they understand what's going on, and operational staff believe this.

(6) Serious effort into the quality and selection of aircraft & equipment - best for purpose, not fitting expediency or political demands.

(7) Robust risk assessment procedures with vertical buy-in.

G
Genghis the Engineer is offline   Reply
Old 31st Oct 2011, 15:22   #4 (permalink)


Probationary PPRuNer
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Ocean View, DE
Posts: 2
Established Progaram - BARS

Flight Safety Foundation has a relatively new program called Basic Aviation Risk Standard (BARS). The UN World Food Program was one of several organizations championing the development of the Standard. The program is based on solid QMS and IOSA process standards. It has a risk-reduction component and its audits schema is adjusted for the size of aircraft and type of environment operated in.

Basic Aviation Risk Standard (BARS) | Flight Safety Foundation

URL deleted - shouldn't be too hard to track down relevant sites. - JT
CaptainBernie is offline   Reply
Old 2nd Nov 2011, 23:57   #5 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Wor Yerm
Age: 57
Posts: 1,942
Quote:
Minimisation of daft management jargon


Quote:
Robust risk assessment procedures with vertical buy-in.
Piltdown Man is offline   Reply
Old 9th Nov 2011, 16:56   #6 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Rugged Island
Posts: 54
Peter,

You have a private message...
Father Dick Byrne is offline   Reply
 
 
This ad will disappear if you login
Reply
 


Thread Tools


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT. The time now is 01:52.


vBulletin® v3.8.7, Copyright ©2000-2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
SEO by vBSEO 3.6.1
© 1996-2012 The Professional Pilots Rumour Network

As these are anonymous forums the origins of the contributions may be opposite to what may be apparent. In fact the press may use it, or the unscrupulous, or sciolists*, to elicit certain reactions.

*"sciolist"... Noun, archaic. "a person who pretends to be knowledgeable and well informed".