Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Rumours & News
Reload this Page >

Uranium in cargo - Heathrow Airport

Wikiposts
Search
Rumours & News Reporting Points that may affect our jobs or lives as professional pilots. Also, items that may be of interest to professional pilots.

Uranium in cargo - Heathrow Airport

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12th Jan 2023, 11:38
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Vance, Belgium
Age: 62
Posts: 271
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 3 Posts
About the present incident in Heathrow and the quoted 747 accidents (El Al and others), one has to understand that U238 is used in quite many industrial processes.
U238 is NOT fissile but it is radioactive (half-life: ~4.5 billion years). It decays through an alpha radiation which is hardly detectable but its child product is the short-lived Th234 which has a half live of 24 days and decays with a beta- radiation (ie: electrons). This beta- radiation triggers radioactivity detectors.
U238 is used for photographic intensifiers, ceramic colorants, dental porcelain additives, armor–piercing bullets, specialised anvils, ballast (as in B747), radiation shields (yes, it looks contradictory, but it is efficient), etc.
It is quite possible that a disused material from one of these above activities has been mixed with other high-value scrap metal.
It is public knowledge that many international airports are equipped with radiation detectors; if this metal was intended for a malicious use, it would not have transited through Heathrow.
Luc Lion is offline  
Old 12th Jan 2023, 14:46
  #22 (permalink)  
Pegase Driver
 
Join Date: May 1997
Location: Europe
Age: 74
Posts: 3,692
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
if this metal was intended for a malicious use, it would not have transited through Heathrow.
Out of curiosity, was there a mention somewhere of what kind of scrap metal the bars were ? looking on line at the resale price of scrap metals it goes from 20 cents a Kg for iron to 6 $/ Kg for pure copper. and most, like aluminium, between 1 and 2 $ /Kg. Asuming it was not copper, why would someone send low value scrap metal bars per air freight?
ATC Watcher is offline  
Old 12th Jan 2023, 14:55
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Vance, Belgium
Age: 62
Posts: 271
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 3 Posts
Titanium scrap is also "cheap"; 0.77 EUR/kg
Palladium, maybe? 36,042 EUR/kg.
Luc Lion is offline  
Old 12th Jan 2023, 18:36
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Moray,Scotland,U.K.
Posts: 1,778
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
It is now reported the Iranian-linked receiver was licenced in the UK to handle uranium, so the "terrorist" suggestions from official sources read like poor attempts at propaganda.
Considering the start point, are bars of freshly smelted ore for separation of rare metals possible?
15kg of most metals will be very low volume.
Maoraigh1 is offline  
Old 13th Jan 2023, 03:03
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Hong Kong
Age: 56
Posts: 1,445
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by ATC Watcher
Out of curiosity, was there a mention somewhere of what kind of scrap metal the bars were ? looking on line at the resale price of scrap metals it goes from 20 cents a Kg for iron to 6 $/ Kg for pure copper. and most, like aluminium, between 1 and 2 $ /Kg. Asuming it was not copper, why would someone send low value scrap metal bars per air freight?
Maybe it has precious metals or high-value metals in it - something that uses high-value metal could be scraped, smelted into an ingot and then sent to a specialist for refining and extracting the valuable portions. I've worked in companies that did such for catalytic converters, organometallic preparations and decorative materials.
Load Toad is offline  
Old 13th Jan 2023, 08:17
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: USA
Age: 60
Posts: 408
Received 31 Likes on 22 Posts
Some years ago, I came back into the US through International Falls MN, and had the nice ICE people sweep my plane for nastiness as we were processed back into the country.

Everyone with a gun inspecting the plane got very excited just about the time that all of the passengers made it into the fbo. Seems there was a significant amount of radiation detected by their tricorders (or whatever)
Well, it turned out that the empty hole in my copilot panel that had been occupied by a dead RMI, and which I filled with a (it turns out) WW2 vintage vertical card compass that I found laying around someplace, had a radium painted dial…
Had some ‘Splainin” to do
421dog is offline  
Old 13th Jan 2023, 10:23
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2017
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 89
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by MechEngr
Oops U-235 is spicier than U-238.

Not as exciting as when the DoE sold an entire uranium enrichment plant to a scrap metal dealer and then provided the dealer the plans to assemble it under an FOIA request. He was steadfast on his request to be appropriately compensated after he made numerous calls to raise the issue as it could have gone anywhere in the world as stainless steel scrap.
any more information on this?
Buswinker is offline  
Old 13th Jan 2023, 13:47
  #28 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: south of Cirencester, north of Lyneham
Age: 76
Posts: 1,267
Received 20 Likes on 9 Posts
A lot of WW2 meters and instruments were very radio active: generally alpha radiation, which can be stopped by a sheet of paper. The trouble comes if they are broken or otherwise opened, the luminous paint has generally started flaking and particles of its dust get inhaled with nasty results Some bits of ex-military gear are so bad for radiation, even through the glass fronts of meters, that they have been withdrawn from displays at museums.
radeng is offline  
Old 13th Jan 2023, 16:12
  #29 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2022
Location: Carterton
Posts: 25
Received 10 Likes on 7 Posts
I have suffered the indignity of explaining why certain readings have been made whilst carrying sealed boxes through airports.
Atlasisrubbish is offline  
Old 15th Jan 2023, 19:42
  #30 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Moray,Scotland,U.K.
Posts: 1,778
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
RTE news : Man arrested over uranium found at Heathrow Airport

http://www.rte.ie/news/uk/2023/0115/...nium-heathrow/
Maoraigh1 is offline  
Old 16th Jan 2023, 12:18
  #31 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: Ferrara
Posts: 8,464
Received 364 Likes on 213 Posts
Police in Cheshire detained the man, in his 60s, on Saturday. He has been bailed until April.

Commander Richard Smith, who leads the Met's Counter Terrorism Command, said: "I want to be clear that despite making this arrest, and based on what we currently know, this incident still does not appear to be linked to any direct threat to the public.

"However, detectives are continuing with their inquiries to ensure this is definitely the case."
Asturias56 is offline  
Old 19th Jan 2023, 00:59
  #32 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Seattle
Posts: 716
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by Winemaker
If it was 'depleted' Uranium (U238 with U235 extracted) then it was pretty harmless.
Either way, Uranium is toxic. That's a chemical property, nothing to do with radioactivity.
EEngr is offline  
Old 19th Jan 2023, 02:16
  #33 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2019
Location: USA
Posts: 864
Received 213 Likes on 117 Posts
Originally Posted by Buswinker
any more information on this?
One version: https://www.washingtonpost.com/archi...-e03a256b154f/
Longer, far better version: https://www.thefreelibrary.com/The+w...le.-a015818779

MechEngr is online now  
Old 19th Jan 2023, 11:15
  #34 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Geneva, Switzerland
Age: 58
Posts: 1,909
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by EEngr
Either way, Uranium is toxic. That's a chemical property, nothing to do with radioactivity.
There area lot of potentially toxic products transported by air freight on a daily basis, some unfortunately not properly reported (as some firefighter sometimes discover).

As for this specific case the investigation is still ongoing but it seems more and more likely that it was not related to any nefarious plan.
atakacs is offline  
Old 19th Jan 2023, 14:46
  #35 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2020
Location: Sussex
Posts: 55
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Many years ago, in the 1980's, I worked in an airfreight forwarders office and warehouse just outside Heathrow. Its was completely normal to find hazardous goods (paint / chemicals / essential oils / batteries etc) described in documentation, and packed as, non -hazardous cargo. Either because of ignorance of the hazard, (and you would hardly believe how ignorant they could be ) or to avoid the expense of packing it properly, and the extra cost of airfreight. Leaking drums were common and even when informed of the problem, the shippers would not believe that their goods could damage the aircraft or other cargo. Hopefully things are better managed now, though I have my doubts.
lightonthewater is offline  
Old 19th Jan 2023, 16:53
  #36 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: Ferrara
Posts: 8,464
Received 364 Likes on 213 Posts
yeah but we just sent something via DPD and the list of "exclusions" was astounding - including a lot of things they've actually delivered to us from manufacturers

"human Flesh" as one we haven't seen yet tho'
Asturias56 is offline  
Old 19th Jan 2023, 17:12
  #37 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2020
Location: Sussex
Posts: 55
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Asturias: we had 'exclusions' as well, and the hazardous packing regs were also sent to customers, but somehow this didn't stop 'mis-declaration ' of cargo, inadvertent or otherwise. As a matter of comparison: a couple of years ago, after a maritime 'incident' where a ship became unstable, all the shipping containers on board were taken off, weighed and the contents checked. Over 20 percent were found to be substantially overweight, in some cases but 200 percent more than the weight declared. The actual contents, likewise, often more little relation to the contents said to be in them. The consequences on the stability and safety of the ship are obvious. (I have been a shipbroker for some 40 years, and know whereof I speak)
lightonthewater is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.