Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Rumours & News
Reload this Page >

Korean 777 interception and diversion

Wikiposts
Search
Rumours & News Reporting Points that may affect our jobs or lives as professional pilots. Also, items that may be of interest to professional pilots.

Korean 777 interception and diversion

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 9th Aug 2017, 05:57
  #41 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Nanaimo, B.C.
Age: 66
Posts: 49
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Can't they use their cellphones once they get low enough?
dash34 is offline  
Old 9th Aug 2017, 10:54
  #42 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 274
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I am aware of a 777 incident quite a few years ago where all VHF, HF and Satcom communications were lost. 7600 was then selected on the transponder. On every frequency that was selected there was an unusual background hum in both pilots' headset. The same hum was there even when no frequency was selected. After 10 minutes of trying numerous different frequencies on all three boxes and Satcom the copilot could smell electrical burning and then saw a few wisps of smoke.

The smoke was coming from the copilot's hand mic on the right fuselage stowage. The side stowage mics are very rarely used.(Anyone remember on the 747 they used to be so emphatic in the scan checks that the mic had to be stowed facing the right way round?) Anyway this one was too hot to touch and the plastic surround was actually melting. When the mic jack was unplugged from the socket all the radios worked normally and contact with ATC was resumed.

It was an interesting lesson that what was clearly a massive short from the copilot's hand mic took out all the radios and not just the frequency that the copilot's transmit selector was set to. This would suggest some interrelationship between the bus bars of different radios.
suninmyeyes is offline  
Old 9th Aug 2017, 12:42
  #43 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: New Hampshire
Posts: 152
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by skirkp
Naive question: Why shouldn't a NORDO fly out their clearance and land, at ZRH? That's what I was taught to do and have taught students as standard IFR lost comms procedure. They must have offered or volunteered to land at Stuttgart, a quieter place.
But if you are NORDO and enter VFR conditions, I believe you are suppose to continue VFR and land ASAP.
.Scott is offline  
Old 9th Aug 2017, 13:04
  #44 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 1,073
Received 66 Likes on 40 Posts
They were in the process to be handed over to Skyguide (Swiss ATC) that controls parts of southern Germany as well. Skyguide refused to accept them without established contact. Continuing to Zürich was no option from that point.
Less Hair is offline  
Old 10th Aug 2017, 09:23
  #45 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 1999
Location: Queensland
Posts: 408
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Most of the hand held radios that operate on the dual frequency bands claimed for these radios are amateur radio frequency modulation. My understanding is that aircraft VHF & UHF is audio modulation. So unless the hand held radios are AM, communication with ATC and other aircraft will not be possible.
In my flying days, I carried an ATC compatible VHF AM transceiver. I also am a licensed amateur with a hand held FM radio that I would never have considered ATC suitable.
autoflight is offline  
Old 10th Aug 2017, 15:23
  #46 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Seattle
Posts: 715
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by suninmyeyes
It was an interesting lesson that what was clearly a massive short from the copilot's hand mic took out all the radios and not just the frequency that the copilot's transmit selector was set to. This would suggest some interrelationship between the bus bars of different radios.
And a frightening lesson as well, given the effort we (engineers) put into doing failure mode and effects analysis of aircraft systems. Having one of a redundant set of systems take out all function isn't supposed to happen. I'm guessing that the one bad mic dragged the entire audio control system down with it instead of triggering some sort of isolation/protection on that input (a breaker of sorts).

This also brings up the subject of an old thread: Adapting headsets with one connector type to another system. While I'm not going to step in and tell people not to do it, this is one possible consequence of an unapproved mod.
EEngr is offline  
Old 11th Aug 2017, 02:01
  #47 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: expat
Posts: 129
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
None of you guys picked up on the AMU comment a page back did you...😎
HPSOV L is offline  
Old 15th Aug 2017, 15:10
  #48 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Seattle
Posts: 715
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
I saw it. I wasn't sure whether that was a hypothetical (what might have happened) or if there was some evidence of an actual fault on KAL 917.

If there is some indication that this actually happened, and that failure was deemed to be extremely improbable during certification, this means that the fleet is safe for another 10^9 hours.
EEngr is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.