Twin Otter Mishap Orchid Island 13 April 17
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: the City by the Bay
Posts: 547
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Twin Otter Mishap Orchid Island 13 April 17
Twin Otter crashes at Orchid Island Airport, 4 injured | Society | FOCUS TAIWAN - CNA ENGLISH NEWS
https://aviation-safety.net/database...?id=20170413-0
Lucky no one seriously hurt. They had just gotten these not long ago to replace some very old Dornier 228.
https://aviation-safety.net/database...?id=20170413-0
Lucky no one seriously hurt. They had just gotten these not long ago to replace some very old Dornier 228.
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: SAYE
Posts: 281
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Strong cross winds are manageable with the Twin Otter, but the tiller should not be touched during the landing roll! Or during the take off roll for that matter. It wouldn't be the first time a pilot tries to steer with the tiller and ends up in the ditch
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: nowhere
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Very true. We had a new Twin Otter captain do this on takeoff at a military base down in South America. They already were unhappy due to a weather diversion in landing there. They put them under house arrest after their excursion and a new crew had be flown all the way down to pick up the aircraft.
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: 5° above the Equator, 75° left of Greenwich
Posts: 411
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Crosswinds on the Twin Otter are certainly manageable but it keeps you on your toes...
You need to pay attention, the wind hits it a bit harder than other types with that tall tail, though it's the same tail and the massive movement from the rudder what helps you fight the crosswinds.
Could it be a case of improper landing technique?
You need to pay attention, the wind hits it a bit harder than other types with that tall tail, though it's the same tail and the massive movement from the rudder what helps you fight the crosswinds.
Could it be a case of improper landing technique?
Join Date: May 2010
Location: UK
Age: 79
Posts: 1,086
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Strong gusting crosswinds are the ones that can catch you out, a sudden gust can have you in the weeds rather quickly. Greasers are bad, you need to get all of the weight on the wheels ASAP.
Probably bad habits by a crew newly converted from the DO228.
Probably bad habits by a crew newly converted from the DO228.
"Mildly" Eccentric Stardriver
Many years ago. Gusting crosswind, which dumped the port wing lower than intended just as aileron effectiveness was lost. The result was the outboard aileron hinge scraping along the runway, until enough speed was lost to allow the aircraft back onto its wheels again. I'm told that from the outside it looked quite spectacular.
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: the City by the Bay
Posts: 547
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Orchid Island and Green Island where these planes fly are known to have high winds and similar mishaps have occurred there with the Dornier 228 that they finally retired.
Is the Twin Otter harder to handle in high winds than the Dornier? Could be the pilots transitioning from the Dornier need more time.
Is the Twin Otter harder to handle in high winds than the Dornier? Could be the pilots transitioning from the Dornier need more time.
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: 5° above the Equator, 75° left of Greenwich
Posts: 411
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I didn't fly the Do but I reckon it has higher operational speeds. They're both STOL if I'm not mistaken, but maybe the lower speeds and the higher lift characteristics of the Otter can make for a gust or something to shake it off its path easier?
Though as a pilot you should be able to handle it with proper landing technique. As the ancient geek puts it, no greasers for starters. Using the props in an effective manner is also helpful as it helps to control the "airborne-mind" of the Otter at touchdown when it's carrying a couple extra knots...
Though as a pilot you should be able to handle it with proper landing technique. As the ancient geek puts it, no greasers for starters. Using the props in an effective manner is also helpful as it helps to control the "airborne-mind" of the Otter at touchdown when it's carrying a couple extra knots...
Join Date: May 2010
Location: UK
Age: 79
Posts: 1,086
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Indeed, its all about directional stability.
In the air speed = momentum = stability.
On the ground directional stability comes from having the wheels firmly on the ground.
So touching down firmly with a bit of extra speed gets you through the vulnerable bit as quickly as possible. But not enough speed to make it float in ground effect.
All STOL types have this vulnerability due to their low touchdown speed.
In the air speed = momentum = stability.
On the ground directional stability comes from having the wheels firmly on the ground.
So touching down firmly with a bit of extra speed gets you through the vulnerable bit as quickly as possible. But not enough speed to make it float in ground effect.
All STOL types have this vulnerability due to their low touchdown speed.
Last edited by The Ancient Geek; 15th Apr 2017 at 19:51.
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: the City by the Bay
Posts: 547
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fjfw60krv68
Any landing that you can use the plane again is a good landing on Orchid Island.
Any landing that you can use the plane again is a good landing on Orchid Island.
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: nowhere
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The Twin Otter handles a strong crosswind very well. Being a high wing aircraft, you can lower that wing down into the crosswind a significant amount. It has a big rudder which also helps. I don't know the length of this runway but in non-STOL ops at flaps 20, it can still land in a fairly short distance.
The runway looks reasonably long in the video. I think a better landing technique might have been a fair amount of wing down and a better flare instead of forcing it on. The wind wasn't even that strong or at too much of an angle to the runway according to the windsock.
The runway looks reasonably long in the video. I think a better landing technique might have been a fair amount of wing down and a better flare instead of forcing it on. The wind wasn't even that strong or at too much of an angle to the runway according to the windsock.
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: the City by the Bay
Posts: 547
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Quite a bit of damage:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mbcKiRYBG4M
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_XlqHXfdIhU
beyond economic repair perhaps?
Direction Length Surface
13/31 1,123m 3,684ft Paved
Previous Daily Air incident with a Do 228
https://www.asc.gov.tw/upload/acd_at...%20Summary.pdf
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mbcKiRYBG4M
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_XlqHXfdIhU
beyond economic repair perhaps?
Direction Length Surface
13/31 1,123m 3,684ft Paved
Previous Daily Air incident with a Do 228
https://www.asc.gov.tw/upload/acd_at...%20Summary.pdf
Join Date: May 2010
Location: UK
Age: 79
Posts: 1,086
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The Twin Otter handles a strong crosswind very well
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Canada
Posts: 631
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
That Twin Otter will be rebuilt. If too many "parts" are needed for the repair, it could be that Viking is asked to produce a cockpit subassembly to splice in. Viking has made subassemblies to enable such repairs before. I would expect that it will return by ship to one of several North American facilities for repair.
Or, as long as the weight of the aircraft is not firmly on three wheels, assure that you are still using the flight controls to maintain control. Even with weight on the nosewheel, at "speed", the rudder is effective enough to scrub the tire, which is as it should be - the flight controls maintain control. However, reverse can be a factor too...
Though I have no idea if it a factor in this event, applying reverse too aggressively or unevenly can cause rapid loss of directional control. Reverse interrupts the effective airflow over the tail, so it works much less well to keep the plane straight, and if applied too rapidly, may be unsymmetrical in effect due to spool up times. This has been the cause of a number of Twin Otter and Buffalo accidents.
A Twin Otter is not equipped with anti skid, so on a wet runway, too much application of brakes can get you in trouble, locking wheels, which can then slide sideways.
A 3600 foot runway is ample for a nice unbraked, non reverse, landing in a Twin Otter. "STOL" technique is not required for that runway, and I doubt operationally approved anyway.
On the ground directional stability comes from having the wheels firmly on the ground.
So touching down firmly with a bit of extra speed gets you through the vulnerable bit as quickly as possible. But not enough speed to make it float in ground effect.
So touching down firmly with a bit of extra speed gets you through the vulnerable bit as quickly as possible. But not enough speed to make it float in ground effect.
Though I have no idea if it a factor in this event, applying reverse too aggressively or unevenly can cause rapid loss of directional control. Reverse interrupts the effective airflow over the tail, so it works much less well to keep the plane straight, and if applied too rapidly, may be unsymmetrical in effect due to spool up times. This has been the cause of a number of Twin Otter and Buffalo accidents.
A Twin Otter is not equipped with anti skid, so on a wet runway, too much application of brakes can get you in trouble, locking wheels, which can then slide sideways.
A 3600 foot runway is ample for a nice unbraked, non reverse, landing in a Twin Otter. "STOL" technique is not required for that runway, and I doubt operationally approved anyway.
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: US
Posts: 2,205
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fjfw60krv68
Any landing that you can use the plane again is a good landing on Orchid Island.
Any landing that you can use the plane again is a good landing on Orchid Island.
Zero crosswind controls. Makes it look worse than the conditions warrant.
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: 5° above the Equator, 75° left of Greenwich
Posts: 411
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
1100 meters is enough for a flap 20 landing which helps a bit to fight a crosswind. +1 on the brakes and reverse re Step Turn. You could even afford to fly it down with a bit of power and wing down until touchdown and then using reverse sensibly. A couple of extra knots should help if the wind is particularly strong. Runway surface looks good, braking shouldn't be an issue
Something must have gone particularly wrong in this case.
Something must have gone particularly wrong in this case.
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: SAYE
Posts: 281
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Flaps 20 for normal landings (normal runways).
Flaps 40 only for extremely short runways (e.g., with high trees at each end); or for training.
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Canada
Posts: 631
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Flaps 40 in a Twin Otter requires piloting skills just a little beyond the standard Caravan/Navajo/King Air. It's easy to get too much weight on the nose wheel, or even wheelbarrow it, which I have seen done. The nose wheel area (known as "station 60") is a little vulnerable to hard landings on the nose wheel. I was always afraid to be responsible for damage in general, and station 60 in particular - so I kept the nose light.
I was trained by a DHC test pilot, who would not let me fly 40 flap landings, until I really impressed him with my flaps 20 landings. He also trained me in 30 flap takeoffs, but that's a story for a different time...
The Twin Otter is a very sure plane to fly, so one feels pretty confident handling them - occasionally too confident, perhaps...
I was trained by a DHC test pilot, who would not let me fly 40 flap landings, until I really impressed him with my flaps 20 landings. He also trained me in 30 flap takeoffs, but that's a story for a different time...
The Twin Otter is a very sure plane to fly, so one feels pretty confident handling them - occasionally too confident, perhaps...
That Twin Otter will be rebuilt. If too many "parts" are needed for the repair, it could be that Viking is asked to produce a cockpit subassembly to splice in. Viking has made subassemblies to enable such repairs before. I would expect that it will return by ship to one of several North American facilities for repair.
Or, as long as the weight of the aircraft is not firmly on three wheels, assure that you are still using the flight controls to maintain control. Even with weight on the nosewheel, at "speed", the rudder is effective enough to scrub the tire, which is as it should be - the flight controls maintain control. However, reverse can be a factor too...
Though I have no idea if it a factor in this event, applying reverse too aggressively or unevenly can cause rapid loss of directional control. Reverse interrupts the effective airflow over the tail, so it works much less well to keep the plane straight, and if applied too rapidly, may be unsymmetrical in effect due to spool up times. This has been the cause of a number of Twin Otter and Buffalo accidents.
A Twin Otter is not equipped with anti skid, so on a wet runway, too much application of brakes can get you in trouble, locking wheels, which can then slide sideways.
A 3600 foot runway is ample for a nice unbraked, non reverse, landing in a Twin Otter. "STOL" technique is not required for that runway, and I doubt operationally approved anyway.
Or, as long as the weight of the aircraft is not firmly on three wheels, assure that you are still using the flight controls to maintain control. Even with weight on the nosewheel, at "speed", the rudder is effective enough to scrub the tire, which is as it should be - the flight controls maintain control. However, reverse can be a factor too...
Though I have no idea if it a factor in this event, applying reverse too aggressively or unevenly can cause rapid loss of directional control. Reverse interrupts the effective airflow over the tail, so it works much less well to keep the plane straight, and if applied too rapidly, may be unsymmetrical in effect due to spool up times. This has been the cause of a number of Twin Otter and Buffalo accidents.
A Twin Otter is not equipped with anti skid, so on a wet runway, too much application of brakes can get you in trouble, locking wheels, which can then slide sideways.
A 3600 foot runway is ample for a nice unbraked, non reverse, landing in a Twin Otter. "STOL" technique is not required for that runway, and I doubt operationally approved anyway.