Captain UA455 removed from flight for "emotional meltdown"
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: nowhere
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Well, she was hired at a time when United was under the gun from a 1976 court decree in a case filed by the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, a 'diversity' agency of the federal government.
United had committed to a 'double quota' hiring strategy to increase diversity and was sued in 1988 by the EEOC for not being compliant with the earlier ruling:
Eeoc Hits United Hiring Plan - Chicago Tribune
As a result of the 1988 suit, United accelerated diversity hiring and adjusted requirements to more aggressively promote inclusivity. Separate interview programs were set up at the old Stapleton airport offices for so called 'EEOC' class (a legal term from an earlier lawsuit) applicants.
Technical knowledge tests were abandoned since some groups did poorly due to cultural bias and lack of educational opportunities.
The skills evaluation ride was no longer given in an airliner sim because that gave people with large plane flying experience an unfair advantage. Instead a little Frasca trainer desktop box with a Cessna type panel was used for the evaluation.
Pilot hiring manager Nancy Stuke published separate sets of average experience levels of successful EEOC and non-EEOC applicants.
Inevitably, some folks with very low experience levels were hired in the late 1980's and early 1990's. Of course, we all started somewhere and after a few thousand hours, you either get it or you don't.
I believe the captain in this incident probably had at least a few hundred hours of flight time, much of it in the family's 1947 Luscombe, and a commercial license when she was hired circa 1989. Also, quite possibly her father knew UAL V.P. of Flight Ops Hart Langer from the Pan Am days which may have helped.
United had committed to a 'double quota' hiring strategy to increase diversity and was sued in 1988 by the EEOC for not being compliant with the earlier ruling:
Eeoc Hits United Hiring Plan - Chicago Tribune
As a result of the 1988 suit, United accelerated diversity hiring and adjusted requirements to more aggressively promote inclusivity. Separate interview programs were set up at the old Stapleton airport offices for so called 'EEOC' class (a legal term from an earlier lawsuit) applicants.
Technical knowledge tests were abandoned since some groups did poorly due to cultural bias and lack of educational opportunities.
The skills evaluation ride was no longer given in an airliner sim because that gave people with large plane flying experience an unfair advantage. Instead a little Frasca trainer desktop box with a Cessna type panel was used for the evaluation.
Pilot hiring manager Nancy Stuke published separate sets of average experience levels of successful EEOC and non-EEOC applicants.
Inevitably, some folks with very low experience levels were hired in the late 1980's and early 1990's. Of course, we all started somewhere and after a few thousand hours, you either get it or you don't.
I believe the captain in this incident probably had at least a few hundred hours of flight time, much of it in the family's 1947 Luscombe, and a commercial license when she was hired circa 1989. Also, quite possibly her father knew UAL V.P. of Flight Ops Hart Langer from the Pan Am days which may have helped.
Doesn't really matter how she got into the airline it would appear that she has significant experience since and I doubt she was given a free ride through the Command process. I think what it does highlight is that professionals from all walks of life and yes even the steely eyed missile persons in the flight deck are under significant stress from things such as personal matters, changes in corporate culture, the drive to squeeze as much "productivity" out of flight crew and uncertainty about retirement incomes. She has made a decision that will impact on the rest of her working life. Don't be too quick to judge because in this day and age none of us know where our particular breaking point is.
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Philippines
Posts: 460
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Lookleft: Absolutely.
But you'd think in this modern world of 'no blame' cultures, work-life balance and equal opportunities that people would come nowhere near their breaking point.
Either the world of work has gone way past the potential for individuals to break down without the mitigation of workplace practices, and/or life in general is simply becoming too complicated and emotionally demanding for many to cope?
I've had two demanding careers, three wives and was emotionally abused as a child. A psychiatrist I met by chance shortly after my last divorce told me after hearing my tale that I was unlikely to survive more than 5 years in his opinion - the emotional 'baggage' would be unbearable.
I drove to Beachy Head the next day and stood right on the edge - and thought 'no' I never would.
There have been ups and downs and some anger and regret, but 11 years later I'm still here and know I never would act irrationally or harm myself or others in any way.
I still wonder if one day, when I get older and my 'walls' are down, I will just simply collapse in a heap under the weight pent up emotions?
But you'd think in this modern world of 'no blame' cultures, work-life balance and equal opportunities that people would come nowhere near their breaking point.
Either the world of work has gone way past the potential for individuals to break down without the mitigation of workplace practices, and/or life in general is simply becoming too complicated and emotionally demanding for many to cope?
I've had two demanding careers, three wives and was emotionally abused as a child. A psychiatrist I met by chance shortly after my last divorce told me after hearing my tale that I was unlikely to survive more than 5 years in his opinion - the emotional 'baggage' would be unbearable.
I drove to Beachy Head the next day and stood right on the edge - and thought 'no' I never would.
There have been ups and downs and some anger and regret, but 11 years later I'm still here and know I never would act irrationally or harm myself or others in any way.
I still wonder if one day, when I get older and my 'walls' are down, I will just simply collapse in a heap under the weight pent up emotions?
What do you want the companies to do? Have an annual psych eval for pilots?
......as part of that job I had to get a physical every 6 months.
I do wonder how many drivers hurtling towards me at a closing speed of 200 kph have ever even seen a doctor ?
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Rockytop, Tennessee, USA
Posts: 5,898
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
As explained to me by several different physicians, part of that exam included a psych evaluation. One of our pilots was flagged by this process and had to undergo further evaluation by the company doctor. He was eventually cleared and I don't remember the exact circumstances, but there is indeed a procedure in place, or at least there used to be. I'm retired now.
Valuable information can be derived from the casual conversation that occurs during the physical examination. Some of this conversation will reveal information about the family, the job, and special interests. Even some personal troubles may be revealed at this time. The Examiner's questions should not be stilted or follow a regular pattern; instead, they should be a natural extension of the Examiner's curiosity about the person being examined. Information about the motivation for medical certification and interest in flying may be revealing. A formal Mental Status Examination is unnecessary.
For example, it is not necessary to ask about time, place, or person to discover whether the applicant is oriented. Information about the flow of associations, mood, and memory, is generally available from the usual interactions during the examination. Indication of cognitive problems may become apparent during the examination. Such problems with concentration, attention, or confusion during the examination or slower, vague responses should be noted and may be cause for deferral.
The Examiner should make observations about the following specific elements and should note on the form any gross or notable deviations from normal:
Appearance (abnormal if dirty, disheveled, odoriferous, or unkempt);
Behavior (abnormal if uncooperative, bizarre, or inexplicable);
Mood (abnormal if excessively angry, sad, euphoric, or labile);
Communication (abnormal if incomprehensible, does not answer questions directly);
Memory (abnormal if unable to recall recent events); and
Cognition (abnormal if unable to engage in abstract thought, or if delusional or hallucinating).
For example, it is not necessary to ask about time, place, or person to discover whether the applicant is oriented. Information about the flow of associations, mood, and memory, is generally available from the usual interactions during the examination. Indication of cognitive problems may become apparent during the examination. Such problems with concentration, attention, or confusion during the examination or slower, vague responses should be noted and may be cause for deferral.
The Examiner should make observations about the following specific elements and should note on the form any gross or notable deviations from normal:
Appearance (abnormal if dirty, disheveled, odoriferous, or unkempt);
Behavior (abnormal if uncooperative, bizarre, or inexplicable);
Mood (abnormal if excessively angry, sad, euphoric, or labile);
Communication (abnormal if incomprehensible, does not answer questions directly);
Memory (abnormal if unable to recall recent events); and
Cognition (abnormal if unable to engage in abstract thought, or if delusional or hallucinating).
A colleague who is big into HIMS drug/alcohol addiction work told me a couple of years ago that the head Department of Transportation doctor was pushing for formal psych exams for pilots but that the FAA Aeromed folks in OKC were not in favor at that time.
Years ago airlines used personality tests like the MMPI to screen applicants but some of that stuff fell out of fashion for a while due to lawsuits like the ones mentioned above claiming cultural bias in hiring decisions.
I understand applicants at some places now take an online Hogan's Goat (I failed ) test for screening.
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Village of Santo Poco
Posts: 865
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Village of Santo Poco
Posts: 865
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Poor thing.
Divorce isn't that devastating - and certainly not something a SANE pilot should get into meltdown over.
If she can't take the strain she should be nowhere near a commercial aircraft - and that's for her to determine as we all have to day-to-day.
I visit to a shrink is definitely required, rest, and maybe a rethink of her career options.
Divorce isn't that devastating - and certainly not something a SANE pilot should get into meltdown over.
If she can't take the strain she should be nowhere near a commercial aircraft - and that's for her to determine as we all have to day-to-day.
I visit to a shrink is definitely required, rest, and maybe a rethink of her career options.
I could be wrong.
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Village of Santo Poco
Posts: 865
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
We'll see, JS, we'll see. Even if changes do come about, I doubt they will touch aviation first. There are industries where this sort of thing is MUCH more of a factor.
This was posted elsewhere earlier today:
Former Red Arrow pilot and war hero Peter Collins killed himself over retirement worries | Bristol Post
Let's leave the yelling about gender, race, politics, unions etc out of this - it goes to show that at any point in our lives any of us, regardless of background or gender may need peer intervention, hand holding etc, and also just maybe we all need to listen a little harder to what is being said by the individual on the other seat.....
Former Red Arrow pilot and war hero Peter Collins killed himself over retirement worries | Bristol Post
Let's leave the yelling about gender, race, politics, unions etc out of this - it goes to show that at any point in our lives any of us, regardless of background or gender may need peer intervention, hand holding etc, and also just maybe we all need to listen a little harder to what is being said by the individual on the other seat.....
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Texas, like a whole other country
Posts: 444
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
1 Post
Wiggy, that's quite a depressing and tragic story. However, given that the deceased had tried to take his own life two weeks earlier and yet the family had "no indication of what was to come," it certainly seems that someone wasn't listening very well. In the hindsight view, I would think at least some of those he left behind have a profound feeling of guilt. Sad all the way around.
Back on track, your point about gender, race, etc. is well taken.
Back on track, your point about gender, race, etc. is well taken.
wiggy, Very well said. Very many people need help at some time in their lives.
Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: Florida
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
There is a concept, externalizers vs internalizers. This is predominantly applied in PTSD. A few years ago my wife tried to end our relationship. I did as she asked, like always.Went as she requested. Her father spoke to me....said to go home, she had told him "daddy he will sit at my grave and kill himself the night I'm buried." A week later I did as she predicted, he was fast enough that I merely lost an eyebrow. Haven't worked since - am not 100% locked on to make life & death decisions over anyone else. My point is merely we all can be broken somehow, it's just a matter of degrees. Having 1st hand experience hope none of you EVER know the feeling. Sincerely,