Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Rumours & News
Reload this Page >

Sunwing pilot pulled off YYC flight due to intoxication

Rumours & News Reporting Points that may affect our jobs or lives as professional pilots. Also, items that may be of interest to professional pilots.

Sunwing pilot pulled off YYC flight due to intoxication

Old 3rd Jan 2017, 05:01
  #61 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Perth, WESTERN AUSTRALIA
Age: 71
Posts: 887
Received 12 Likes on 9 Posts
Mmmmm ..... sort of.
Actually, physical height and sex (gender that is) plays a part too.

A 200 lb male at 165 cm probably has about 500 ml less blood than a person of the same weight but 180 cm tall.
Refer - Nadler method of calculation.
WingNut60 is offline  
Old 3rd Jan 2017, 05:15
  #62 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: USA
Posts: 241
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
True dat. I should have made clearer that I was grossly approximating.
Gauges and Dials is offline  
Old 3rd Jan 2017, 08:42
  #63 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: Manchester, UK
Posts: 1,958
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Uplinker, being as the whistle was blown here by the F/O, I don't see how it backs up your assertion on "protection".
ShotOne is offline  
Old 3rd Jan 2017, 10:08
  #64 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: UK
Posts: 2,471
Received 84 Likes on 49 Posts
No, I agree, but I am confused by the line of reasoning some use that says: we should not randomly or routinely test pilots, such things should be managed by peer intervention.
Uplinker is online now  
Old 3rd Jan 2017, 14:04
  #65 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: Manchester, UK
Posts: 1,958
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Perhaps because this incident WAS safely resolved by peer intervention? Not to say that's the only safeguard. Pilots face "with cause" testing which already goes way beyond other safety-critical personnel. There's no testing whatever, random or otherwise, for surgeons, doctors or medical staff -even if they made an error resulting in a patient death. Nor would a UK police officer face mandatory testing even if he'd just accidentally shot someone.

Last edited by ShotOne; 3rd Jan 2017 at 14:52.
ShotOne is offline  
Old 3rd Jan 2017, 15:05
  #66 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: London
Posts: 7,072
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
A lot of people in engineering jobs in the UK face "without cause" & "random" testing and they aren't in anything like as critical safety jobs
Heathrow Harry is offline  
Old 3rd Jan 2017, 19:50
  #67 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: UK
Age: 70
Posts: 288
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yep. Try being a train driver. Prohibition (bottle to throttle as you would say) times of days, not hours prior to working, when on-call total sobriety - can be for up to a week, employer "must exercise due diligence" to ensure train drivers are not impaired through drink or drugs - which is why testing is quite common.

Doesnt help the trains run on time tho'
Pinkman is offline  
Old 3rd Jan 2017, 20:02
  #68 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,257
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
There's no testing whatever, random or otherwise, for surgeons, doctors or medical staff -even if they made an error resulting in a patient death.
A drunk surgeon might kill a patient. But a drunk pilot might kill hundreds of passengers in a single mass casualty incident. Hence there are special rules for transportation industry professionals and others in similar positions.
peekay4 is offline  
Old 3rd Jan 2017, 21:45
  #69 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,852
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Although this kind of incident has occurred a few times over the years, this is the worst I have heard of...
Pilot allegedly passed out prior to flight 'the worst I have heard of:' aviation expert | CP24.com
rotornut is offline  
Old 4th Jan 2017, 00:46
  #70 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Australia
Posts: 380
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Pinkman pointed out that your colleagues are not always going to be able to call out a drunken pilot as they may be drunk also.

Obviously, that is true but no matter what provisions are put in place somebody will always find a way around whatever system is in place unless we start being tested at sign on and every half hour thereafter.

As far as being infallible, the human race sucks!

In Oz, we have a pretty good system where those that know they have a problem and act, can get help without losing their livelihood or trying to hide the problem (which is where the real problems start)

It does occur to me that in my 17.5 years of flying, I've been tested, for alcohol only, on two occasions both of which were at outports, up to 4 hours after sign on.

I'd like to see a bit more random testing, I don't think it would be too burdensome on the industry or the regulator.
Willie Nelson is offline  
Old 4th Jan 2017, 03:01
  #71 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: USA
Posts: 241
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Can we rethink this from first principles here?

Our institutional treatment of the issue is hung up on a moral / legalistic framework when it should be looking at a systems performance and safety framework.

Consider our reaction to the video of a pilot staggering through the security checkpoint, which can in many cases be summed up as, "whoa! that guy needs to be sanctioned .... unless it was due to a medical condition."

The objective here is to avoid the situation in which someone who is not at the top of his or her game takes control of an aircraft full of passengers. If we get confused, and think that it's about stopping bad behavior, then we lose the plot.

If a pilot is not in top condition, why do we even care the reason? That person should not be flying an airplane that day. Period. In the case of pilot error resulting in a crash, everyone's equally dead, regardless of whether the pilot's performance was impaired because of substance abuse, the flu, diabetic crisis, a fight with his wife, fatigue from overwork, or a crappy night's sleep because of the teenagers partying until 4:00 AM in the next hotel room.

We seem to be confused here. Yes, there is a moral, ethical, or contractual difference between, on the one hand, being unfit to fly because you contracted flu and are running a high fever and, on the other hand, being unfit to fly because of something you did to yourself. But that's really between you and your employer; as a co-worker or a passenger I don't care. I'd much rather that the procedures around detecting impairment focus 100% on the safety of the aircraft and 0% on enforcing any legal or contractual obligations.

Last edited by Gauges and Dials; 4th Jan 2017 at 03:02. Reason: minor typos
Gauges and Dials is offline  
Old 4th Jan 2017, 03:27
  #72 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: korat thailand
Age: 83
Posts: 137
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
All About Ignition Interlocks

All about Ignition Interlocks - how they work - costs - BAIID - breathalyzer


one of these on every 'plane?
crippen is offline  
Old 4th Jan 2017, 03:33
  #73 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: USA
Posts: 241
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I'd be more interested in something that tests some combination of visual acuity, dynamic vision, reaction time, ability to cope with task saturation, etc.

"Before leaving the crew room, score over 76 on this video game or go home, no questions asked unless it starts happening regularly...."
Gauges and Dials is offline  
Old 4th Jan 2017, 04:24
  #74 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Dubai - sand land.
Age: 55
Posts: 2,831
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Which shouldn't be a problem for the gelled and spiky-hair generation who've grown up with X-boxes. Some of us haven't played video games since the days of Pac-Man and Space Invaders


There are people in every profession who, sadly, hit the bottle too hard... And by too hard meaning that no threat of random testing, peer assistance etc etc will make a blind bit of difference - until they're caught out such as in this case!
White Knight is offline  
Old 4th Jan 2017, 04:28
  #75 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Dubai - sand land.
Age: 55
Posts: 2,831
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
And to add. I'm damn sure I could fly better after a couple of pints of beer than after a restless night, say in Shanghai during Chinese New year, and then looking at the stars for 8 hours before shooting a Cat3 into Dubai after an hour of holding.

FATIGUE is far more of an issue in aviation than booze
White Knight is offline  
Old 4th Jan 2017, 04:50
  #76 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: USA
Posts: 241
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by White Knight
Which shouldn't be a problem for the gelled and spiky-hair generation who've grown up with X-boxes. Some of us haven't played video games since the days of Pac-Man and Space Invaders
well, yeah, the value of the approach depends entirely on whether or not the test is a realistic measure of "being on top of one's piloting game" I meant "video game" rather loosely.
Gauges and Dials is offline  
Old 4th Jan 2017, 06:26
  #77 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Land of 1,000 Dances
Age: 63
Posts: 68
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by White Knight
And to add. I'm damn sure I could fly better after a couple of pints of beer than after a restless night, say in Shanghai during Chinese New year, and then looking at the stars for 8 hours before shooting a Cat3 into Dubai after an hour of holding.

FATIGUE is far more of an issue in aviation than booze
White Knight, your post doesn't make any sense at all.

Putting aside the question of whether a "a couple of pints", or about a litre, of a decent full strength brew would leave you fit to fly, surely, both fatigue and booze are problems?

Sure, a very fatigued pilot may be a bigger risk than a pilot who has imbibed a quiet light beer (and less than 2 pints) some hours before take-off. However, a pilot who has had several drinks prior to a flight will probably be a bigger risk than a a pilot who happened to have a less-than-perfect night's sleep.

Further, let's consider a fatigued pilot whose condition is exacerbated by having a few drinks. That is, one who is both fatigued and drunk. He would be considerably more dangerous than a pilot who is "merely" fatigued.

It's true that fatigue is a major issue, and a more prevalent problem than alcohol consumption by professional pilots. But to trivialize the severe effect of alcohol consumption on a pilot's aptitude is just plain silly.
HighAndFlighty is offline  
Old 4th Jan 2017, 06:41
  #78 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Dubai - sand land.
Age: 55
Posts: 2,831
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by HighandFlighty
But to trivialize the severe effect of alcohol consumption on a pilot's aptitude is just plain silly.
I'm actually not trivialising it; but if you choose to read it that way...

As you point out both booze and fatigue are problems amongst the pilot masses, I do feel however that fatigue is actually a far greater issue...

But to trivialize the severe effect of alcohol consumption on a pilot's aptitude is just plain silly.
There are quite a few studies out there showing that small amounts of alcohol may actually improve performance. I say may. Take a look at them... Fatigue on the other hand NEVER improves performance. Been there and done that many times!

Not that I would condone flying after small amounts of booze of course. Just making a point!
White Knight is offline  
Old 4th Jan 2017, 07:06
  #79 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,257
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
There are quite a few studies out there showing that small amounts of alcohol may actually improve performance.
It depends how one defines "performance". There are studies showing that small amounts of alcohol may improve creative problem solving, but at the expense of focus and alertness. Not a good thing when you're shooting that Cat 3 approach!

Plus alcohol is also a sedative: it increases fatigue levels and may also interfere with sleep. So it's silly to say fatigue is better than alcohol, since alcohol leads to fatigue.

The Sunwing Captain passing out in the cockpit is a good clue about the relationship between alcohol and fatigue...
peekay4 is offline  
Old 4th Jan 2017, 07:29
  #80 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 929
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Their must be more to this story. "Passing Out" some how he got himself to the cockpit which would seem to me to be impossible for someone so drunk he was about to pass out. Whilst he was allegedly over the aviation limit, I wonder if he just fell asleep due to other reasons. Like fatigue.

Those of us who are old enough to remember it was almost a right of passage to be able to have a skin full the night before & still operate the next day. Even have a " sharpener" on the last leg. Be what it may I never saw or heard of anyone passing out at the controls but I did hear of a pilot turning up to work in only his underpants. (Not a recomended procedure)

However I am not condoning drinking & flying as modern aircraft are much more complex & sheer flying skills are no longer second nature.
IcePack is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.