Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Rumours & News
Reload this Page >

China Southern A320 damaged in hailstorm

Rumours & News Reporting Points that may affect our jobs or lives as professional pilots. Also, items that may be of interest to professional pilots.

China Southern A320 damaged in hailstorm

Old 18th Jul 2016, 21:48
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: PA
Age: 59
Posts: 30
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
China Southern A320 damaged in hailstorm

A China Southern Airlines passenger jet was able to land safely after suffering severe damage, including cracked cockpit windows and fist-sized holes to the fuselage, after being hit by hailstones while flying between Guangzhou to Chengdu on Saturday.



underfire is offline  
Old 18th Jul 2016, 22:00
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Texas
Age: 64
Posts: 7,131
Received 320 Likes on 204 Posts
Are there any photos that show damage to leading edges or surfaced of any of the airfoils? Mostly saw nose and windscreen in the photos. (Ouch! Glad they got back in one piece).
Lonewolf_50 is offline  
Old 18th Jul 2016, 22:43
  #3 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: PA
Age: 59
Posts: 30
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Was hoping for those as well, but have not found any.
underfire is offline  
Old 18th Jul 2016, 23:25
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 1999
Location: Queensland
Posts: 408
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
TS avoidance in China

When I used to fly to China, it was considered very bad form to ask for diversion around TS, and request would be refused. Is this still the case? Is there any history of an emergency declaration and diversion without clearance?

The radar picture should have looked horrendous. Will we ever see an official report re this event?
autoflight is offline  
Old 19th Jul 2016, 01:40
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Moved beyond
Posts: 1,169
Received 83 Likes on 48 Posts
...considered very bad form to ask for diversion around TS, and request would be refused. Is this still the case? Is there any history of an emergency declaration and diversion without clearance?
I don't know about "considered very bad form", but clearances to divert around weather are often not available from civil controllers in China due to the proximity of military airspace. The best way to obtain a clearance in such circumstances is to declare an emergency. That gives the civil controllers more ammunition to obtain a clearance from their military counterparts. You have to plan ahead and allow enough time, but the clearance is usually forthcoming.
BuzzBox is offline  
Old 19th Jul 2016, 03:35
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Asia
Posts: 2,372
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Same thing happened to a Delta B747 last year, he wasn't able to get clearance to deviate.
Metro man is offline  
Old 19th Jul 2016, 03:54
  #7 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: PA
Age: 59
Posts: 30
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
seems just to be the radome. windscreen took a hell of a beating.

this image has a bizarre perspective angle

underfire is offline  
Old 19th Jul 2016, 04:03
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Moved beyond
Posts: 1,169
Received 83 Likes on 48 Posts
I wonder if it was reported to CAAC and how many 'demerit' points they'll be given?

Oh, hang on a minute, it's only those pesky foreign airlines that have safety issues in China. Silly me...
BuzzBox is offline  
Old 19th Jul 2016, 06:52
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Hong Kong
Age: 56
Posts: 1,445
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
This picture has hurt the feelings of the Chinese people. Please remove it. There are no hail stones in China.
Load Toad is offline  
Old 19th Jul 2016, 13:13
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Tring, UK
Posts: 1,823
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Bet that was noisy while it was going on...
FullWings is online now  
Old 19th Jul 2016, 13:26
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Reading
Age: 41
Posts: 100
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by autoflight
When I used to fly to China, it was considered very bad form to ask for diversion around TS, and request would be refused. Is this still the case? Is there any history of an emergency declaration and diversion without clearance?

The radar picture should have looked horrendous. Will we ever see an official report re this event?
Interesting. I've heard it's a bit of an effort to get clearance before but that it's actually bad form to even ask. So what would you do with a CB identified ahead? I assume you didn't just lough through?

I have to say I'm reluctant to take any flight that routes over China given the reports from pilots about this issue. I know you're supposed to be able to declare emergency, but I trust Delta and appparently they weren't able to avoid. I'd rather not take my chances we might not be forced to fly into an area where you essentially become a test pilot and are relying on blind luck to keep the plane together. There is no way of knowing what forces might lie in a particular CB...
neila83 is offline  
Old 19th Jul 2016, 13:48
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Blingland
Age: 55
Posts: 329
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Well, having flown thru Chinese airspace many times, you do have to plan ahead with regards to WX/CBs enroute.

You ask for deviation, if not granted ask for alternative routing. Then you make a Pan call, then finally declare a Mayday as a last resort, and go around the Wx and/or hold present position if suitable. Usually you get the response clear to avoid. There are procedures for this if you do not get a response, radio busy, which is common at times in Chinese airspace. Follow them, but fly through CB's nah.

SyB
Sheikh Your Bootie is offline  
Old 19th Jul 2016, 15:47
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: everywhere
Posts: 502
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
These days it's slightly better getting clearances for wx avoidance in Chinese airspace than what it was a few yrs ago. I have heard some airlines threaten pans and mayday if a clearance or alternative wasn't granted and it usually gets sorted. However last week while avoiding a CB I spotted another aircraft below going in the opposite direction flying directly towards a large constantly flashing CB. I see this quite often while avoiding wx a whole bunch of TCAS targets flying into said wx.

Jxf63 bloody hilarious post.
flyhardmo is offline  
Old 19th Jul 2016, 18:14
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Earth
Posts: 182
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I had to declare PAN PAN PAN a few months ago to avoid a line of thunderstorms near Chongqing. Any request for a new heading was met with "not available due to restriction".

Sichuan Airlines had an A321 suffer similar damage in June.
NEDude is offline  
Old 20th Jul 2016, 01:43
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Reading
Age: 41
Posts: 100
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by flyhardmo
These days it's slightly better getting clearances for wx avoidance in Chinese airspace than what it was a few yrs ago. I have heard some airlines threaten pans and mayday if a clearance or alternative wasn't granted and it usually gets sorted. However last week while avoiding a CB I spotted another aircraft below going in the opposite direction flying directly towards a large constantly flashing CB. I see this quite often while avoiding wx a whole bunch of TCAS targets flying into said wx.

Jxf63 bloody hilarious post.
That's rather scary...do some pilots not value their lives? Is it get-there-itis? You don't have to get to destination at all costs, including risking everyones lives. It's like a train driver carrying on full steam after being told there's a tree on the line ahead. None would do it. But there does seem to be an attitude in aviation sometimes of well, if we want to get there, we'll just have to buckle up, cross our fingers, and enjoy the ride. I understand this doesn't apply to the vast majority of pilots, but that any do at all is enough to worry.
neila83 is offline  
Old 20th Jul 2016, 20:05
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: The Back of Beyond
Posts: 149
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
No neila83, it's China.

If you're a local carrier your too terrified to deviate and/or ask permission to do so. If you're hkg based you just get on with it, jump up and down, declare a pan or mayday if you need to. If you're a foreign carrier, you might be to ingrained with the idea that ATC is there to help you (like in the USA, hence the Delta hail incident) to even consider the fact that the pilots and atc aren't working together to avoid an inflight break up.

That's China for you.

Yay
Flying Clog is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.