Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > PPRuNe Worldwide > North America
Reload this Page >

Delta Flight lands at wrong airport on 7/7

Wikiposts
Search
North America Still the busiest region for commercial aviation.

Delta Flight lands at wrong airport on 7/7

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 9th Jul 2016, 15:54
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Netherlands
Age: 71
Posts: 165
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Long time retired but I am glad I wasn't lured into a mistake like that, although I almost (as a young S/O) talked a crew into taking a wrong RWY. Luckily the boss had (then) 18.000hrs more than I had and noticed the difference in heading and we could swap to the correct one.

Like the Ancient Greek, I would say, they have been punished already hard enough, and it will haunt them for years to come, (especially after a few beers with colleagues), more punishment is not effective.

Like my Chief Pilot then used to say about incidents like this: I am going to laugh my head off about these things, AFTER I am retired myself.....
Double Back is offline  
Old 9th Jul 2016, 16:52
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Rockytop, Tennessee, USA
Posts: 5,898
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
If you land successfully at the wrong airport the FAA really can't take any action.
Not sure I'd believe that one.
Airbubba is offline  
Old 9th Jul 2016, 17:55
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Denver
Posts: 1,226
Received 14 Likes on 8 Posts
I loved the Denver Post's headline this morning (deep inside the paper, not P.1)

"Delta Err Lines"

Story reported there have been over 150 incidents since the "early 1990s" of commercial (pax and cargo) aircraft starting to land at the wrong airport in the U.S. - of which 35 continued to a landing; the other crews caught their error while still on approach and went around.
pattern_is_full is offline  
Old 9th Jul 2016, 18:42
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: England
Posts: 115
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
When I started operating single crew charter flights 30 odd years ago I was given some great advice from a much more experienced Captain. He advised me always to set up and follow the instrument approach even in perfect weather to avoid landing at the wrong airport. KRAP had a VOR and an RNAV approach so no excuse for this whatsoever. The fact that they got away with this is irrelevant as the outcome could have been catastrophic.
CHfour is offline  
Old 9th Jul 2016, 19:42
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: UK
Age: 79
Posts: 1,086
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Heh - try single pilot operations in Africa in the days before GPS. If you were new to the reserve finding the correct game lodge strip twice out or three is good. After a year getting it wrong once a week is about average, there is always one that you hav'nt beeen to for a few months.
Nowadays they are probably doing better with GPS but one dirt strip in the bush next to a few huts will still look like many others.
The Ancient Geek is offline  
Old 9th Jul 2016, 22:43
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Perth, WESTERN AUSTRALIA
Age: 71
Posts: 889
Received 19 Likes on 12 Posts
No case to answer

Originally Posted by Airbubba
Not sure I'd believe that one.

I'm with you Airbubba.
Can't imagine that this can happen and the regulators can't see a flaw in the proceedings and a low-hanging butt to kick.


But now that we know that there has been 30+ similar incidents in 16 years then perhaps its just a cultural thing, entrenched, irresolvable ...........
WingNut60 is online now  
Old 9th Jul 2016, 23:57
  #27 (permalink)  
Trash du Blanc
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: KBHM
Posts: 1,185
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Well for starters, I'm guessing the Air Force base is not in the company op specs.

And performance was not calculated for that runway.

And they violated their ATC clearance.

etc.

At least they didn't do what the ASA crew did while I was working there... take back off again and land at the correct field. That was malfeasance, not misfeasance.....
Huck is offline  
Old 10th Jul 2016, 06:59
  #28 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Among camels and dunes
Posts: 425
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Guess which one he should've landed on?




I know, I know, I got the runway in sight Captain, I've got it!!!
Jetjock330 is offline  
Old 10th Jul 2016, 16:25
  #29 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Where the Quaboag River flows, USA
Age: 71
Posts: 3,411
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Huck,

Might be in their Ops Specs, ithe AFB is both an alternate for KRAP and sometimes has been used during construction at the civil airport.

Second, the ND might have shown KRCA instead of KRAP, if there was a corrupted up linked flight plan or a manual entry from a bad paper plan.

GF
galaxy flyer is offline  
Old 10th Jul 2016, 17:19
  #30 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Denver
Posts: 1,226
Received 14 Likes on 8 Posts
The fact that they got away with this is irrelevant as the outcome could have been catastrophic.
In the abstract, of course. But then, walking out your front door "could" lead to a catastrophe. Landing at the correct airport has led to many catastrophes - no "could" about it.

What odds are you assigning? 1 in 10? 1 in 35? 1 in 100?

Here's a list of "wrong-airport" landings dating back to 1950. 92 in total.

http://www.thirdamendment.com/WrongWay.pdf

One (1) resulted in a confirmed fatality (B29 bomber at Ogden UT).

One (1) might (tongue in cheek ) be counted as a "National Security catastrophe" (U.S. military officers mistakenly delivered to an airport in the USSR, instead of in Turkey).

I don't disagree with your post overall - but the "hyperventilation" in that last sentence spoils the effect.
pattern_is_full is offline  
Old 10th Jul 2016, 20:05
  #31 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: UK.
Posts: 4,390
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I know a man who intended to land on the SW runway at Lossiemouth.
He had radar direction who said something like "Now joining downwind right. Call tower on ***.*"
He looked out to the right and saw the runway, called tower and was cleared to finals.
Upon calling finals he was cleared to land.
As he exited the runway he noticed the Nimrods.
He continued along the taxiway, had a good look around, took off, turned right and called downwind again, at Lossie this time and not Kinloss, and landed successfully.
No comment was made by Lossie, Kinloss or the pilot, who never told anyone for a long time until he told me.
Funny old thing, the station badge motto at Lossie is 'Thoir an aire' which can be translated as 'Pay attention' or 'Be careful'.
Basil is offline  
Old 10th Jul 2016, 20:56
  #32 (permalink)  

Avoid imitations
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Wandering the FIR and cyberspace often at highly unsociable times
Posts: 14,573
Received 419 Likes on 221 Posts
It can even happen to the best.....

https://youtu.be/cpc6i2VifZ0
ShyTorque is offline  
Old 10th Jul 2016, 21:13
  #33 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: The foot of Mt. Belzoni.
Posts: 2,001
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
In most of these incidents, it's almost traditional to flame those sitting at the pointy-end.
But control towers traditionally have BIG windows, so that those paid to sit inside can look out......And check everything is going according to plan.
ZOOKER is offline  
Old 10th Jul 2016, 21:26
  #34 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Florida and wherever my laptop is
Posts: 1,350
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Sounds like you haven't spent many hours in a control tower with streams of traffic on multiple runways in varying weather conditions. Noticing someone who should _not_ be on approach can be difficult.
Ian W is offline  
Old 10th Jul 2016, 21:34
  #35 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Singapore
Posts: 72
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Pilots are human

And to err is human.This is something that some pilots need to learn here.

I see two types posting.

1) those accepting that pilots mess up every now and again, and using their mistakes and others' mistakes to improve their own game.

2) those who believe that pilots (and themselves) are infallible, and look for any excuse to blame someone or something else or "wait for the full report". It's called denial.

As slf these days, I want type 1 up front. Type 2 is a bigger risk.

An example. Flydubai, 12 seconds commanded nose down trim on GA, toga thrust. Official release. If you say suicidal, you pass. If you say, let's wait for the full report, you fail.

Landing at the wrong airport comes with some risks. But not as much as 12 seconds nose down trim at low alt and toga thrust.... The most important thing a pilot can learn is human fallibility.
Julio747 is offline  
Old 10th Jul 2016, 21:48
  #36 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: formally Alamo battleground, now the crocodile with palm trees!
Posts: 960
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Out of curiosity. Would the tower receive a low altitude alert, if a plane is lined up with the wrong airport?
Squawk7777 is offline  
Old 11th Jul 2016, 00:36
  #37 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Everett, WA
Age: 68
Posts: 4,407
Received 180 Likes on 88 Posts
New Boeings (at least the widebodies, not so sure about the 737) have an option that will give you a verbal alert if you're aligned with the wrong runway or the runway is too small for your aircraft.
I'm guessing Airbus has something similar.

Scuttlebutt for the Dreamlifter 747 that landed at the wrong airport was that the first officer kept saying something wasn't right but the captain dismissed him - Capt. was 'encouraged' to retire, FO went through some re-training before being allowed to resume normal ops.
tdracer is offline  
Old 11th Jul 2016, 04:26
  #38 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Rockytop, Tennessee, USA
Posts: 5,898
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by tdracer
Scuttlebutt for the Dreamlifter 747 that landed at the wrong airport was that the first officer kept saying something wasn't right but the captain dismissed him - Capt. was 'encouraged' to retire, FO went through some re-training before being allowed to resume normal ops.
Over the years that has been a common resolution for incidents involving alleged pilot error. Often the captain is near retirement but the FO has a lot of years left so it's worth taking the hit and getting reinstated. And, traditionally it was better to take some time off from the company than risk the wrath of the feds if the airline didn't punish you.
Airbubba is offline  
Old 11th Jul 2016, 07:45
  #39 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Northern Territory Australia
Posts: 105
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Ian W
Sounds like you haven't spent many hours in a control tower with streams of traffic on multiple runways in varying weather conditions. Noticing someone who should _not_ be on approach can be difficult.
My 2 previous posts on this subject have disappeared so perhaps this one might remain and be commented upon. I find it odd that a military airbase isn't aware of the traffic making an approach to land there especially if it is a civilian aircraft. In these days of heightened security surely someone should have noticed; or is this a case of being asleep at the desk!
Gove N.T. is offline  
Old 11th Jul 2016, 10:07
  #40 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 1999
Location: world
Posts: 3,424
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I find it odd that a military airbase isn't aware of the traffic making an approach to land there
If you look at the photograph above you may note the close proximity of the airbase and the airport. Therefore, the airbase tower must be quite used to seeing inbound traffic to the civil airport. If, as in this case, an aircraft makes a sudden approach to their own runway I would imagine there's not much one can do in the very short time involved. Don't forget that the aircraft will not be on the airbase frequency. Best they MIGHT be able to do is ensure their runway is clear and then just watch the aircraft land.
Hotel Tango is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.