Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Rumours & News
Reload this Page >

AA evacuates at LHR-smoke in the cabin

Wikiposts
Search
Rumours & News Reporting Points that may affect our jobs or lives as professional pilots. Also, items that may be of interest to professional pilots.

AA evacuates at LHR-smoke in the cabin

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 29th Jun 2016, 17:51
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: Porirua
Posts: 77
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I would also reference sim and training procedures of AA,of which I am very familiar.....Its the Capts Call,.... Period!
Pakehaboy is offline  
Old 1st Jul 2016, 00:35
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: NZ
Posts: 51
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Wageslave
A wing is on fire from tip to root and no evac is ordered - and we "have no reason whatsoever to question the...decision"

This must rate as one of the most astonishing assertions of the month.
Would you have evacuated the SIA PAX knowing there was a reasonable possibility that by the time the last PAX deplaned they'd be deplaning into a pool of burning Jet A1 when you had the option of keeping them safe in the cabin whilst rescue services shortly delivered a mother load of foam on the fire?

I'd suggest that the decision was far from clear cut.

How easily could we have been reading a report like this:

"Accident investigators are calling into question the decision of the captain to initiate an evacuation after 15 passengers died and 47 other were treated in hospital for extensive 2nd and 3rd degree burns after fuel flowing under the aircraft ignited shortly after the evacuation commenced. Unevacuated passengers remaining onboard were uninjured as rescue fire services quickly brought the fire under control".

And yes - I'll be the first to say that the report could have read completely differently again. It's a judgement call - one that one needed all the facts at the time to be available to have the best chance of making it correctly. He was there - we weren't. Yes - it's a gamble to keep people onboard - but it's also a gamble to evacuate. We're really not in a position to say which gamble had the best chance of success because we don't have all the information.

My money is on the guy (a) not being stupid (based on the assumption that stupid people never make it as far as captaining a bird that size) and (b) making what he thought was the best decision at the time, with the information he had available.

Last edited by BugSmasher1960; 1st Jul 2016 at 00:58.
BugSmasher1960 is offline  
Old 6th Jul 2016, 22:40
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: UK
Age: 58
Posts: 3,489
Received 147 Likes on 82 Posts
The AA55 at MAN returned to stand this afternoon after an APU fault appeared just before take off. I guess they are being very cautious.
TURIN is offline  
Old 7th Jul 2016, 00:31
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Posts: 570
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Despite my limited feelings towards US Airport Customs & Security Staff. Would you feel safer flying with AA or with SQ right now?
kaikohe76 is offline  
Old 7th Jul 2016, 04:41
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Texas
Age: 64
Posts: 7,187
Received 381 Likes on 235 Posts
Originally Posted by kaikohe76
Despite my limited feelings towards US Airport Customs & Security Staff. Would you feel safer flying with AA or with SQ right now?
kaikohe, is there no third choice?
Lonewolf_50 is offline  
Old 7th Jul 2016, 04:52
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: Porirua
Posts: 77
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by kaikohe76
Despite my limited feelings towards US Airport Customs & Security Staff. Would you feel safer flying with AA or with SQ right now?
Kaikohe bro.....a little harsh there mate!!! Jeeezzz,mate.......are we that bad (AA).. Let's not use one brush to paint all.Do you know how many flights a day we run???, more than most,hopefully I'm reading your post wrong.....Kapai
Pakehaboy is offline  
Old 7th Jul 2016, 07:19
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: PA
Age: 59
Posts: 30
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Less chance of flipping on its tail!
underfire is offline  
Old 7th Jul 2016, 08:45
  #28 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Posts: 570
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Fair enough guys, there are other choices of course & no disrespect directed towards them. However, regarding recent posts here & elsewhere on Prune on the question of evacuations, I always thought, if things are rather dire in or about the aircraft, you got the pax & crew off PDQ, even if this might mean the odd sprained ankle etc. Difficult decision of course, but as we all know, the situation can turn very rapidly to custard. No axe to grind at all, safe flying to all.
kaikohe76 is offline  
Old 7th Jul 2016, 15:07
  #29 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: Porirua
Posts: 77
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Kaikohe,wholeheartedly agree it could turn to custard very quickly.The bottom line here I believe is in constant training of how and when to initiate an evacuation.Because of the delicate nature,size of A/C,number of pax,airport facilities etc etc and mostly,the issue at stake,whether it be APU,engine cabin or a variety of others,information becomes gold.Where I'm at,evac training is done every 9 months(not enough) under a variety of situations.I learn something everytime I make a cockup,but at least it is controlled and I can self evaluate my decision making.

I have come close on two occasions in declaring an evac,luckily both occasions were indication issues,and it never eventuated.But at least the crew were prepared and trained,and the mindset was in place.Very seldom do you get evacs 100% right,if you have read the post-flight evac from the crew,something was either missed,forgotten or just plain lost in translation.An example being the Hudson water landing,Paxs standing on wings,I don't remember seeing the wing exit ropes being anchored???,please correct me if I'm wrong.

Kaikohe mate,just look back a few years,and I'm not pointing fingers,or scape goating anyone here,but there have been several Asian carriers, (LLC types)no names mentioned,but video and eye witness reports (a mate and pilot on one of these flights)show the crew evacuating before the Passengers!!!!. Lovely!! At least where I'm at,we try to do it right,like so many others ......Kapai
Pakehaboy is offline  
Old 9th Jul 2016, 00:50
  #30 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Posts: 570
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Pakehaboy

Appreciate your last post & thanks for your comments.
For me, it's quite some time since sitting at the sharp end & much in the aviation world has progressed since then. However basic airmanship I'm fairly sure will still prevail, as it must of course, for all our sakes.
The question of when & when not to evacuate, I suppose will still be discussed long after I'm garden compost & it will always be, dammed if you do & dammed if you don't, I would think. I was lucky enough never to be met by a really serious event during my time in the air, double air system failure on the 1-11 was interesting, but thankfully fairly strait forward to deal with, we descended fairly quickly I recall.
Cheers.
kaikohe76 is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.