Incident: Swiss A333 at Zurich on Nov 26th 2015, hydraulic failure
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Wallisellen, Switzerland
Age: 75
Posts: 156
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Incident: Swiss A333 at Zurich on Nov 26th 2015, hydraulic failure
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Alternate places
Age: 76
Posts: 97
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Alternate places
Age: 76
Posts: 97
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Well, you weren't there. Do you fly these aircraft; do you know the A330? On a diagonal taxiway it worked smoothly, without effort. Once the tail was clear of the runway, we stopped and requested a tow to the gate. QED.
FDMII: I can echo your experience. I had two Green System losses on the A330 and it is indeed simple to vacate at a high speed turnoff. The second event was on a Base Training detail (ie. no pax onboard ) and we tried to taxy slowly back from the runway. However, if all the fluid is lost from the steering pistons then there is no damping and at low speeds the nosewheel did not continue to castor if you get off line and we found that it tended to "snap" over in the fashion familiar to a supermarket trolley. Therefore a tow back was used.
Of interest, I once witnessed a Thai B747 land with a SYS1 HYD failure ( ie. no nosewheel steering + other faults ) Not only did he clear the runway but he taxied all the way to the stand + parked there using differential brakes. My jaw dropped!
Of interest, I once witnessed a Thai B747 land with a SYS1 HYD failure ( ie. no nosewheel steering + other faults ) Not only did he clear the runway but he taxied all the way to the stand + parked there using differential brakes. My jaw dropped!
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Alternate places
Age: 76
Posts: 97
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
In our own event, the "but" implied in the first post was a really odd event that occurred during the ECAM procedure. The ECAM checklist was carried out but the moment the Green system pumps were selected off, the HYD B RSVR LO LVL ECAM message came up, requiring a shut-down of the Blue system pumps...
As I said, not really newsworthy other than Pax not where they wanted to be.
I had a dual hyd. fail on an A300. Green and Yellow, although yellow was servo jam so we still had flaps and alt. brakes. We upgraded from Pan Pan to Mayday only because the Milan controller would not stop talking to us while we ran the check lists.
Landing was normal but we got towed in as there was no steering.
I had a dual hyd. fail on an A300. Green and Yellow, although yellow was servo jam so we still had flaps and alt. brakes. We upgraded from Pan Pan to Mayday only because the Milan controller would not stop talking to us while we ran the check lists.
Landing was normal but we got towed in as there was no steering.
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Feet on the rudder pedals
Age: 59
Posts: 61
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I had the same with a DC8, 20 years ago or so. On this acft there's a single hydraulic circuit with a priority valve that allows hydraulic flight controls to be activated even with some hydraulic leaks.
Ourselves, we lost up to the last drop of skydrol on board... Servo-tab flight controls (hence DC = "Douglas Cable", or "Diesel & cable" ) at FL390, not much a matter, electrical back-up horizontal stabilizer setting, and.... one of my very best landings with that workhorse.
Then normal use of thrust reversers (pneumatic moved on the Jurassic Tube JT3D), and finally easy exit on a high-speed turnoff with differential braking, using brake pressure accumulator to bring the aircraft to a full stop.
A total non-event.
Then we just asked a tug to taxi in...
Ourselves, we lost up to the last drop of skydrol on board... Servo-tab flight controls (hence DC = "Douglas Cable", or "Diesel & cable" ) at FL390, not much a matter, electrical back-up horizontal stabilizer setting, and.... one of my very best landings with that workhorse.
Then normal use of thrust reversers (pneumatic moved on the Jurassic Tube JT3D), and finally easy exit on a high-speed turnoff with differential braking, using brake pressure accumulator to bring the aircraft to a full stop.
A total non-event.
Then we just asked a tug to taxi in...
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Alternate places
Age: 76
Posts: 97
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Homebuilt - good story - hat's off to you -an almost-complete hydraulic loss on the '8 is more significant than loss of the green system on an Airbus, (A320/A330/A340 series). Well done. How heavy were the controls?
Cable-driven servo-tabs on the ailerons/elevators, electric trim for the horizontal stab, and cable-driven rudder and the aux pedestal by the oiler's panel behind the F/O that had an Alternate Hydraulics lever..., IIRC? - loved the airplane.
Cable-driven servo-tabs on the ailerons/elevators, electric trim for the horizontal stab, and cable-driven rudder and the aux pedestal by the oiler's panel behind the F/O that had an Alternate Hydraulics lever..., IIRC? - loved the airplane.
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Feet on the rudder pedals
Age: 59
Posts: 61
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Thank you!
Wasn't writing this thinking I deserve any congrats... Indeed we had been trained for that during the type rating. Flying a DC8 (and I guess a DC9/MD80 that seems to be using the same technology) without hydraulic isn't that tricky. Servo-tab technology allows low effort handling on flight controls. Indeed you only move tabs that must have the same surface than a Cessna 172's aileron or elevator. And these tabs themselves move the big 8's elevators, ailerons and rudder.
Simply, there's a little bit more inertia, that's why we were taught to move flight controls with a "staccato" style motion: moving them, block them and wait for matching aircraft response. And that works well..
And indeed, I also loved that good old Douglas..
Wasn't writing this thinking I deserve any congrats... Indeed we had been trained for that during the type rating. Flying a DC8 (and I guess a DC9/MD80 that seems to be using the same technology) without hydraulic isn't that tricky. Servo-tab technology allows low effort handling on flight controls. Indeed you only move tabs that must have the same surface than a Cessna 172's aileron or elevator. And these tabs themselves move the big 8's elevators, ailerons and rudder.
Simply, there's a little bit more inertia, that's why we were taught to move flight controls with a "staccato" style motion: moving them, block them and wait for matching aircraft response. And that works well..
And indeed, I also loved that good old Douglas..
Last edited by homebuilt; 6th Dec 2015 at 07:56.
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Alternate places
Age: 76
Posts: 97
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
"Wasn't writing this thinking I deserve any contrats..."
I know; - spoken as a true professional.
We need to pass that quality on to those coming up behind us... ;-)
Cheers,
I know; - spoken as a true professional.
We need to pass that quality on to those coming up behind us... ;-)
Cheers,