Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Rumours & News
Reload this Page >

Explosion proofing

Wikiposts
Search
Rumours & News Reporting Points that may affect our jobs or lives as professional pilots. Also, items that may be of interest to professional pilots.

Explosion proofing

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 24th Jul 2015, 21:19
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Too far North
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Explosion proofing

Interesting possibilities with this idea;

Aircraft 'bomb bag' limits on board explosion impact - BBC News
SunnyUpHere is offline  
Old 26th Jul 2015, 09:54
  #2 (permalink)  
ekw
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Hong Kong
Posts: 46
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
They never mentioned the weight but I imagine this would be the biggest limiting factor. Sounds like somebody needs their research grant renewed.
ekw is offline  
Old 26th Jul 2015, 10:43
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: N Ireland
Posts: 266
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Idea has merit.
The cynic in me still does not see a reduction in airport security hassles any time soon though. Where would all the "trained" workers go!!!!!!
My son is a commercial kitchen fitter and on a recent course on installing gas water heaters which generally are wall mounted they were advised by HSE that these should all be contained within floor cupboards for safety in the event of an explosion. When the son pointed out that the normal cupboard would not be very effective at containing it and in fact could very well increase the potential damage he was told in no uncertain terms that it was now the law.
Solar is offline  
Old 26th Jul 2015, 16:43
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Canada
Posts: 464
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by ekw
They never mentioned the weight but I imagine this would be the biggest limiting factor. Sounds like somebody needs their research grant renewed.
They say it's 1.3mm thick, so presumably it can't weigh anywhere near as much as the luggage contained inside it.

I liked the part about having a bag in the cabin, so if someone is carrying a bomb on board, you can toss them in there before they blow up.
MG23 is offline  
Old 26th Jul 2015, 19:51
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Paris
Age: 60
Posts: 101
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Damn!

I'd have got it away it but fer you pesterin' kids.

*Rips off pilot face to reveal - well - something else.*
Nialler is offline  
Old 26th Jul 2015, 22:53
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: USA
Posts: 93
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I would think this is at least equally interesting to the Freight guys...could well be a life saver if they can zip up the contents of their pallets in something like this for fire suppression.
ion_berkley is offline  
Old 27th Jul 2015, 10:49
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Florida and wherever my laptop is
Posts: 1,350
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It does make you wonder what would happen with a pallet of Li-Ion batteries were to be in a bag like this. Would it contain the fire? It could even be based on a small bag for each battery. Although a bomb is a flash fire and done, whereas the batteries are longer burning.
Ian W is offline  
Old 27th Jul 2015, 13:32
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 265
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Or in the event of a cargo fire, would they reduce the effectiveness of the cargo fire suppression?
Derfred is offline  
Old 27th Jul 2015, 14:11
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: wales
Posts: 462
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Got the impression it needed space to deform and absorb the explosion so couldn't be full and needed space around it ? So couldn't be full ? or have i missed something ?
bvcu is offline  
Old 29th Jul 2015, 07:06
  #10 (permalink)  
RF4
 
Join Date: May 2014
Location: CNX
Age: 80
Posts: 25
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yes, they state that it will require space inside to accommodate gaseous expansion from the explosion, probably something in the order of 20-30 % expansion space. They also state that the bags are designed to expand, rather than rupture, so that additional space would be required to be clear of all bulkheads when it expands explosively. All told it will probably require expansion space of at least half again the volume of the contents. The space calculations and packing will need to not be haphazard, but will probably require either an on-ramp supervisor, or a very sophisticated computerized loading procedure.

Now then, Mr Bean Counter these bags are not cheap, but they only add about 20 % to the freight weight, and only require 50 % more space on board the A/C. The extra supervisor and loading labor should not be too expensive. Just think of all the lives that will be saved ..... but ....... but ... an onboard explosion could happen any day now ................................................. . . . .

Last edited by RF4; 29th Jul 2015 at 07:08. Reason: typo
RF4 is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.