Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Rumours & News
Reload this Page >

Virgin landing gear incident LGW!

Wikiposts
Search
Rumours & News Reporting Points that may affect our jobs or lives as professional pilots. Also, items that may be of interest to professional pilots.

Virgin landing gear incident LGW!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 20th Jan 2015, 08:55
  #221 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: last time I looked I was still here.
Posts: 4,507
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Posted by 36050100z; One thing I was mildly surprised about was how long after landing the engines appear (from the head-on footage) to have been kept running after coming to a stop.

I've just watched the video and ask the wondered the same. I don't think this question was ever answered. Another observation was how long it was from the full-stop to the arrival of the 1st fire truck at the a/c. It was many seconds, yet they were all in position. Just curious.
RAT 5 is offline  
Old 20th Jan 2015, 10:11
  #222 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,307
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
That isn't necessary and may just lead to an accidental fuel starvation thus giving you a whole new set of problems to work through.
Not to mention lateral control problems in the air. The aircraft starts letting you know there is an imbalance even with 2~3 tonnes difference between opposite tanks.

One thing I was mildly surprised about was how long after landing the engines appear (from the head-on footage) to have been kept running after coming to a stop.
Perhaps the absence of fire indications on the flight deck? Perhaps the flight crew thought along the lines that if they switched off the engines, they've committed themselves to a full scale evacuation in the immediate future, with: Cabin emergency light batteries running flat, loss of airconditioning (even on cold days, a full aircraft gets warm pretty quickly with all the doors closed), power to passenger address systems depleting, etc. With an evacuation by slides, you run the risk of injury to passengers.

The tower told them to look for cues from the fire service. In this case, does the fire service contact them on VHF or do they use some kind of hand signals?
NSEU is offline  
Old 20th Jan 2015, 13:16
  #223 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Euroland
Posts: 147
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Fire service in the UK on 121.6 vhf
Tom! is offline  
Old 20th Jan 2015, 23:40
  #224 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: West Sussex
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
NSEU: Run the APU?
Harolds is offline  
Old 21st Jan 2015, 03:49
  #225 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,307
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I did actually consider that. Is it wise to introduce another source of fire? (asked in a previous message)

The APU bleed duct does run through the opposite wheel well, but I believe part of the APU fuel line runs in the right hand wing gear well (ref AMM 28-24-04). I've never actually noticed it.

On APU shutdown, too, the APU has a tendency to dump a bit of fuel on the tarmac.

Last edited by NSEU; 21st Jan 2015 at 03:59. Reason: grammar fail
NSEU is offline  
Old 7th Feb 2015, 11:13
  #226 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: United Kingdom
Age: 82
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Cover Up

Has anybody noticed that neither Flight International or Aviation Week carried this story in their magazines !! I wonder why ?
SevenSeas is offline  
Old 7th Feb 2015, 14:27
  #227 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: UK
Age: 55
Posts: 25
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
B747-300 Body Gear Landing

I have seen photos of ZS-SAS landing on only the Body Gears it was in the 1980's, Both Wing Gears did not come out for landing, the aircraft didn't look very stable looked like it was about to fall over and the shock struts were fully compressed but landing was perfect considering there was No Auto Landing Feature in the Auto pilot those days.
Capt_Tech is offline  
Old 7th Feb 2015, 14:36
  #228 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: UK
Age: 55
Posts: 25
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Aircraft accident and incident reporting

To report an accident it is mandatory, but incidents are first handled by the operators QA department where the decision is made whether to keep the incident "In House" or report it to the CAA and other.
Capt_Tech is offline  
Old 7th Feb 2015, 17:19
  #229 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 3,982
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
To report an accident it is mandatory, but incidents are first handled by the operators QA department where the decision is made whether to keep the incident "In House" or report it to the CAA and other.
I thought the reporter of any MOR had the option of ticking the box for a copy to go to CAA notwithstanding any company protocol?
fireflybob is offline  
Old 23rd Feb 2015, 18:06
  #230 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 1998
Location: .
Posts: 2,994
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Cool

The MM was followed, and actuator replaced iaw MM, however the procedure was lacking so if you are going to blame anyone blame Boeing.
spannersatcx is offline  
Old 23rd Feb 2015, 20:35
  #231 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: LHR
Posts: 68
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Spanners,
How is the MM procedure lacking? Surely Virgin cannot be the first 744 operator to replace this actuator and expose the faulty procedure?
BOAC73 is offline  
Old 23rd Feb 2015, 20:58
  #232 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Another Planet.
Posts: 559
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Were the engines really running, or were the fans just windmilling in the breeze, as is normal and any heat haze from exhausts was residual?
BARKINGMAD is offline  
Old 23rd Feb 2015, 21:53
  #233 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: UK
Age: 76
Posts: 620
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
xavaar

I'm not sure that it is wise to reveal this information at this time. The press monitor these forums and cannot always be relied upon to report the facts. spannersatcx has a valid point, which I'm sure will be in the final (factual) report.

Capt Tech

have seen photos of ZS-SAS landing on only the Body Gears it was in the 1980's
In the 80's the procedure when one wing gear would not extend was to land on the body gear only. However, this was a complicated procedure which entailed disabling the No4 hydraulic system so Boeing changed the procedure so as to land on all available gear.

Last edited by Airclues; 23rd Feb 2015 at 22:11.
Airclues is offline  
Old 24th Feb 2015, 08:43
  #234 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 1998
Location: .
Posts: 2,994
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by BOAC73
Spanners,
How is the MM procedure lacking? Surely Virgin cannot be the first 744 operator to replace this actuator and expose the faulty procedure?
have a look and see what is missing.
spannersatcx is offline  
Old 24th Feb 2015, 08:50
  #235 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Scotland
Age: 80
Posts: 451
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
BOAC - some years ago I found that the MM procedure for changing a landing gear component on the 747 was incorrect and brought Boeings attention to it. Remember that whoever wrote the manual did so before the aircraft entered service and the manuals will be amended over the years only if someone cares to inform Boeing of discrepancies.
bcgallacher is offline  
Old 24th Feb 2015, 12:11
  #236 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 929
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yep a good tech would know the MM is wrong guess aviation engineers are slowly becoming fitters. Shame.
IcePack is offline  
Old 25th Feb 2015, 08:12
  #237 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: uk
Posts: 257
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Glad you've got the case buttoned up there Columbo! Maybe when you see the facts when the report comes out you will understand a bit more about what led to things panning out the way they did, glad you werent in charge of the investigation.
For info no one was suspended.
vs69 is offline  
Old 25th Feb 2015, 08:31
  #238 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: EGSS
Posts: 943
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Virgin landing gear incident LGW!

It's common to find errors in the MM, IPC etc which is why companies have a publications change request system or equivalent to have them updated when they come to light. Typical of those not in the know to automatically point the finger at Virgin Engineering (and no I don't work for them)
Flightmech is offline  
Old 25th Feb 2015, 09:24
  #239 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Reading, UK
Posts: 15,810
Received 199 Likes on 92 Posts
While that's certainly true in my experience, it's strange nevertheless that an operation that must have been completed hundreds of times on a type/variant that's been in service for over 25 years appears not to be adequately documented in the MM.
DaveReidUK is online now  
Old 25th Feb 2015, 12:22
  #240 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Scotland
Age: 74
Posts: 125
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
Icepack.
Yep a good tech would know the MM is wrong guess aviation engineers are slowly becoming fitters. Shame”.

And sometimes they are not allowed to do what they think is right! See page 3 of the link.

https://www.chirp.co.uk/upload/docs/...ATFB%20113.pdf
morton is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.