PPRuNe Forums

Go Back   PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Rumours & News
Forgotten your Username/Password?

Rumours & News Reporting Points that may affect our jobs or lives as professional pilots. Also, items that may be of interest to professional pilots.

Thread Tools
Old 26th Mar 2014, 22:00   #8321 (permalink)
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Australia
Posts: 42

One candidate could be a driftnet.

It's hard to get aerial pics of them, but see eg Marine Debris UAS Survey - Photos under "Net Fragment"
auraflyer is offline   Reply
Old 26th Mar 2014, 22:21   #8322 (permalink)
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Valencia, Spain
Age: 72
Posts: 4
Many years ago I witnessed a Buccaneer do a vertical dive into the Johore Strait following loss of control and the crew ejecting. All I saw was a huge fountain of water from each wing. It was later recovered basically intact having slowed very rapidly and settled on the bottom in shallow water. If a 777 did the same it would likely do serious damage to the front end and the wings/engines would break off but the cabin may remain more or less intact and the whole lot would sink to the bottom, any air having been expelled through the damaged areas.
Ka-2b Pilot is offline   Reply
Old 26th Mar 2014, 22:26   #8323 (permalink)
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: LSZG
Age: 42
Posts: 50
I tagged something here in this map 242381 which looks to me like being a aircraft tail floating semisubmerged
MartinM is offline   Reply
Old 26th Mar 2014, 22:34   #8324 (permalink)
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Nova Scotia
Age: 46
Posts: 19
Another angle....

Mudman is offline   Reply
Old 26th Mar 2014, 22:40   #8325 (permalink)
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Florida
Posts: 23
Another angle....
Looks like it's been in the water a lot longer than just since March 8.
DCrefugee is offline   Reply
Old 26th Mar 2014, 22:41   #8326 (permalink)
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: EGSS
Posts: 733
Malaysian Airlines MH370 contact lost

Fire bottle. I'm not sure even if it was in salt water for two weeks it would have corroded that quickly and if it was the real deal it could be traced by part and serial numbers if it actually was off MH 370.
Flightmech is offline   Reply
Old 26th Mar 2014, 22:57   #8327 (permalink)
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: coventry, u.k
Age: 28
Posts: 12
If the 'reports' are true, i and i'd assume YOU too would find it hard to believe MH370 was allowed to carry on on its merry way.

All purely speculative, but just as possible as all the other 'wild' theories being thrown about, until evidence suggests otherwise.
BRAKES OFF is offline   Reply
Old 26th Mar 2014, 22:57   #8328 (permalink)
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 6
Fire Bottle

Yes you have to go with the evidence that Immarsat provided which points to the south Indian Ocean. But these particular aircraft parts don't wash up on shore everyday. Also it looks to me to have been in the water about the right amount of time.
tlbrown350 is offline   Reply
Old 26th Mar 2014, 23:01   #8329 (permalink)
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: West Australia
Age: 43
Posts: 24
Have just enlarged and compared those 2 images of the object....I dont even think they are pics of the same object. in the first one, there is corrosion around the "screws" on the 2nd, there is none. Also, i cant find evidence of the wire attached at the top of the object in the 2nd image on the object in the first image. also, the level of surface corrosion seems to have changed between images!
DocRohan is offline   Reply
Old 26th Mar 2014, 23:12   #8330 (permalink)
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Australia
Age: 50
Posts: 13
Lonely fire bottle

If the Maldives object really is a fire bottle, the question must be asked: if a B777 is so completely smashed that a fire bottle floats free, how is it that not one other item has floated ashore nearby?
InfrequentFlier511 is offline   Reply
Old 26th Mar 2014, 23:25   #8331 (permalink)
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Australia
Posts: 623
A photo of the part # and serial # needs to be posted for this to have any meaning.

It would be good to know where it came from regardless.
currawong is offline   Reply
Old 26th Mar 2014, 23:32   #8332 (permalink)
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: wales
Age: 31
Posts: 2
@DocRohan I think you're right, either different objects or they have given it a hell of a clean up!
fatdeeman is offline   Reply
Old 26th Mar 2014, 23:42   #8333 (permalink)
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Atlanta, GA USA
Age: 51
Posts: 144
Don't know if MH370 even had fire bottles such as the one pictured, because of the phasing out of Halon systems. The Maldives are quite far from the present search area. I'd be surprised if the Inmarsat calculations were that far off. I think the engineers have done a great job helping to narrow down a search area. Plus, wouldn't other things have washed up around the same area if this bottle was from a recent crash?
Replacing Halon in Fire Protection Systems: A Progress Report
Coagie is offline   Reply
Old 26th Mar 2014, 23:45   #8334 (permalink)
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Out there
Posts: 138
For any 777 drivers out there-would the fly by wire system and associated protections keep the plane in the flight envelope after fuel starvation and flameout (with a/p engaged and both pilots incapacitated)?Could this have led to an impact with a low vertical speed component and an airspeed just above stall speed?
I'm not a T7 driver, but logic says both engines out. Loss of hydraulics and electrical systems. It's unlikely the autopilot will stay connected in this scenario. Can a 777 pilot please confirm.
F_one is offline   Reply
Old 26th Mar 2014, 23:49   #8335 (permalink)
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Trinidad And Tobago
Age: 43
Posts: 3
Yep those two bottles look different,one more rusted than the other..Also no evidence of damaged mounts or screws,surely an impact strong enough to expose such a part would also damage it.
Raptor Systems TT is offline   Reply
Old 26th Mar 2014, 23:59   #8336 (permalink)
Join Date: May 2008
Location: USA
Posts: 40
If you assume for the moment that the suspect fire bottle is indeed from MH370, is there a possible scenario wherein the fire bottle was ejected by some some sort of explosion/fire on board yet the aircraft continued to fly on for some distance?

Given the current hypothetical flight path for MH370 it appears to have turned south almost due east from the point where the bottle was found. Perhaps such an "event" (if such an event is possible) caused M370 to unexpectedly alter course and turn south. Prior to the tun south, MH370 appeared to be following known way points, yet it suddenly turned south and flew in a straight line along no established route. This might explain both the presence of the bottle (again, only if it is from MH370) and account for the satellite pings. Just a thought . . .
areobat is offline   Reply
Old 27th Mar 2014, 00:00   #8337 (permalink)
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: here and there
Posts: 119
that bottle pictured is definitely NOT from a b777.
unless they have been shopping at home depot for hardware, lol.

this is a b777 engine fire bottle, cargo and apu bottles are similar
buttmonkey1 is offline   Reply
Old 27th Mar 2014, 00:05   #8338 (permalink)
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Trinidad And Tobago
Age: 43
Posts: 3

In such a scenario at least the mounts or screws would've been damaged,with severed heads or broken metal between intact screws from mounting provisions/frame (like a jagged washer)..
Raptor Systems TT is offline   Reply
Old 27th Mar 2014, 00:26   #8339 (permalink)
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Oz
Posts: 108
WRT the object, I'd think flat blade screws haven't been used in a while in an aviation application. (Could be wrong). If it is not a fire bottle, what is it?
clark y is offline   Reply
Old 27th Mar 2014, 00:34   #8340 (permalink)
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: wales
Age: 31
Posts: 2
It may well be off an aircraft just not a 777 by the looks of it.

Another possibility is that it was part of a rocket stage that reentered the atmosphere or never fully left. You see a lot of pressure vessels make their way back down. I suppose their shape helps them to avoid being burnt to a cinder. I would say it looks a bit too clean for that though.

Looking at the images of the washed up object and the schematic my guess would be yes it's a fire bottle but no it isn't from a 777
fatdeeman is offline   Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

All times are GMT. The time now is 22:08.

vBulletin® v3.8.7, Copyright ©2000-2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
SEO by vBSEO 3.6.1
1996-2012 The Professional Pilots Rumour Network