Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Rumours & News
Reload this Page >

Malaysian Airlines MH370 contact lost

Wikiposts
Search
Rumours & News Reporting Points that may affect our jobs or lives as professional pilots. Also, items that may be of interest to professional pilots.

Malaysian Airlines MH370 contact lost

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 8th Mar 2014, 17:11
  #401 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Usually on a grass taxiway
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by newscaster
Canadians, both New Zealanders, one French, two Americans and three Australians were all Asian names.
One of the New Zealanders was not Asian: Two Kiwis feared dead on missing Malaysia Airlines aircraft - National - NZ Herald News
CaptainDrCook is offline  
Old 8th Mar 2014, 17:11
  #402 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: London Under EGLL(LHR) 27R ILS
Age: 31
Posts: 500
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
No but I am a Pilot at Biggin Hill Airport, I don't claim to be someone I'm not. But the T7 has a set fuel burn rate [SFCs] for different periods of flight which for this flight worked out to be 40T of trip fuel. I assume you know this.

The aircraft going missing had probably 70℅ of it's fuel uptake left - so 5-6hours unburned at time of dissapearance.
HeathrowAirport is offline  
Old 8th Mar 2014, 17:11
  #403 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Reading, UK
Posts: 15,816
Received 201 Likes on 93 Posts
Originally Posted by Jack1985
initial indications are the track bearing switched from 024 degrees to 333 degrees and altitude went from 35,000ft to 0ft along with the speed going from 468kts to 0kts in the space of one minute
No, those are initial misinterpretations of what FlightRadar24 is and isn't capable of telling us.
DaveReidUK is offline  
Old 8th Mar 2014, 17:12
  #404 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Las Vegas NV.
Age: 63
Posts: 165
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Quote:
Curious to know if Dangerous Goods were onboard... specifically lithium batteries. While we are D/G approved, that is one of a few items I refuse to carry on my jet.


Yes there were. In the ELT, each ULB, FMS not to mention cell phones, iPads, notebook computers...


I wonder if we should consider adding a baro switch to the ELT? That way a major failure that depressurized the cabin would start the ELT and might provide a better position fix prior to impact. If the aircraft is recovered by the flight crew they can always reset it from the remote switch.
LASJayhawk is offline  
Old 8th Mar 2014, 17:12
  #405 (permalink)  
short flights long nights
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Posts: 3,879
Received 154 Likes on 48 Posts
What is an ADR? God give me strength
SOPS is offline  
Old 8th Mar 2014, 17:13
  #406 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Found in Toronto
Posts: 615
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Andy_S
You agree that what was unlikely? Engine failure?? Not applicable to AF447.

AF447 went from cruising altitude to impact in just 3 1/2 minutes. During that time the crew were rather to busy trying to work out what was going wrong to make any calls.

An engine problem such as fuel starvation (for example) wouldn't have downed MH370 that quickly. I reckon they could have glided for 20-30 minutes which would have given them plenty of time to put out a Mayday. The fact they didn't do so suggests that whatever happened was either immediately catastrophic or quickly became so. Beyond that, I wouldn't like to speculate.
I agree that it is unlikely that MH370 had time to make a call, but it is possible they had time, but were too preoccupied to do so. Just as with AF447.
Lost in Saigon is offline  
Old 8th Mar 2014, 17:13
  #407 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Ireland
Posts: 1,167
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
What about a triple ADR failure?
Precisely what I also think, but apparently its unwise to think of such things!

Just re the stolen passports, is there not a high crime rate of stolen passports in Thailand, and possibly could this simply have been immigrants trying to get into China? I would be unaware I have to admit of immigration trends to China, initially I would have though it wouldn't be that high - But its the only real concrete information in relation to MH370 at the moment, alike AF447 I think it will be a while before we actually know what happen this aircraft.

No, those are initial misinterpretations of what FlightRadar24 is and isn't capable of telling us
FR24 released the last tracking file of MH370 take a look at there twitter. And I hardly believe you are in a high position to determine if its misinterpretation are you?
Jack1985 is offline  
Old 8th Mar 2014, 17:21
  #408 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: The Winchester
Posts: 6,553
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
What about a triple ADR failure?
Air Data Reference (ADR)
And a T7 has how many of these devices?
wiggy is online now  
Old 8th Mar 2014, 17:24
  #409 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Ireland
Posts: 1,167
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
And a T7 has how many of these devices?
I am probably wrong with this but I believe on the T7 there are two ADIRUs (Air Data Inertial Reference Unit) for each pilots section complemented by a secondary attitude air data reference unit (SAARU) as well as standby instruments, stand to be corrected on that!
Jack1985 is offline  
Old 8th Mar 2014, 17:24
  #410 (permalink)  
short flights long nights
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Posts: 3,879
Received 154 Likes on 48 Posts
Last time I checked the 777 had no ADRs, but when I get to work tomorrow, I will check.
SOPS is offline  
Old 8th Mar 2014, 17:26
  #411 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Planet Moo Moo
Posts: 1,279
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
777-200 'planned' fuel burn equates to an average of 6 tonnes an hour in the cruise. Extra needs to be taken into account for climb and cruise climbs.


Minimum reserve fuel for our fleet 'tends' to be around 3 tonnes.
Taxi fuel, contingency fuel and diversion fuel on top.


For example a recent flight of mine, 10 and 1/2 hours.
Trip fuel 77.3 tonnes
Contingency 2 tonnes
Div 3 tonnes
Reserves 3 tonnes
Taxi 500kg
Total 85.8 tonnes.


Make of that what you will if you want to calculate how much fuel they would have had on board.


As a previous SAR pilot kerosene will show up as smooth 'rainbowing' on the surface of the sea. Crude oil produces the brown slicks and grey water discharges from merchant vessels.


My condolences to the crew and passengers, I will await the accident report with interest.
Wirbelsturm is offline  
Old 8th Mar 2014, 17:26
  #412 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 330
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Andrasz (post #372)
The advisory on the MAS website that contact with MH370 was lost at 0240 local is obviously in error, perhaps unintentional or a misinterpretation.

Rockhound
Rockhound is offline  
Old 8th Mar 2014, 17:33
  #413 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Reading, UK
Posts: 15,816
Received 201 Likes on 93 Posts
Originally Posted by Jack1985
FR24 released the last tracking file of MH370 take a look at there twitter. And I hardly believe you are in a high position to determine if its misinterpretation are you?
So (correct me if I am misquoting you, please) you are seriously suggesting that the aircraft's final ADS-B squitter indicated a true altitude of zero, presumably at the precise instant when (obviously intact, despite no voice or ACARS comms during the descent from FL350) it impacted the sea.

Which bit of your scenario have I got wrong?
DaveReidUK is offline  
Old 8th Mar 2014, 17:33
  #414 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Planet Moo Moo
Posts: 1,279
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Last time I checked the 777 had no ADRs, but when I get to work tomorrow, I will check.

Nope, no ADR. ADIRS. Air Data Inertial Reference System provides


primary, secondary and standby air data.
Inertial reference information.


Components are:
One ADIRU
One SAARU
Eight air data modules
six static ports
three pitot probes
two angle of attack vanes
two TAT probes.
Wirbelsturm is offline  
Old 8th Mar 2014, 17:35
  #415 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: europe
Posts: 112
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
T777 is pretty bullet, idiot proof in its design, so if the ADIRU went off then the SAARU would have taken over, if every thing failed the aircraft is capable of being hand flown all be it in a degraded state.



The guys flying it were pretty experienced, and giving the captains age and experience would have been able to hand fly it, having probably flown steam driven planes prior to getting on the T777.

If as its been said here its altitude went from 35000ft to 0 in one minute, its either blown up (bomb or massive structural failure) or the wings come off due to fatigue from previous damage and its torn its self apart.

Does anyone recall if the guys in TWA800 got a mayday call out.
Enos is offline  
Old 8th Mar 2014, 17:35
  #416 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Ireland
Posts: 1,167
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
So (correct me if I am misquoting you, please) you are seriously suggesting that the aircraft's final ADS-B squitter indicated a true altitude of zero, presumably at the point where (obviously intact, despite no voice or ATC comms during the descent from FL350) it impacted the sea.

Which bit of your scenario have I got wrong?
No sorry I apologise, what I was basically saying is last night people discredited FR24, but now the location FR24 last broadcast the flight seems to be fairly accurate, although admittedly as there is no wreckage that's unconfirmed. And of course you are correct, the final altitude and speed are erroneous on FR24, sorry if I implied the opposite.
Jack1985 is offline  
Old 8th Mar 2014, 17:43
  #417 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: The Winchester
Posts: 6,553
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Wirbelstrum

Nope, no ADR.
Indeed, that's what my "books" say as well....
wiggy is online now  
Old 8th Mar 2014, 17:45
  #418 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: USA
Posts: 245
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
What about a triple ADR failure?

Precisely what I also think, but apparently its unwise to think of such things!
First, total ADR failure is wildly improbable.
Second, even when it has happened it is still possible to fly the plane by turning the systems off.
Third, as such incidents have shown with ADR failure communications are important to get independent confirmation of airspeed.

Finally, I do not recall any ADR fault that has been found to be the primary cause of a hull loss.
MountainBear is offline  
Old 8th Mar 2014, 17:46
  #419 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: NZ
Posts: 835
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
This talk of ADIRS failure is pure nonsense - simply doesn't explain the situation.

With the available info (admittedly quite sparse), I can't get passed the idea of a catastrophic structural failure. What I wouldn't like to speculate on is the cause, except to note that in 20 years of 777 operation, nothing like this has even come close to happening (compared with the likes of the 747 and DC10 where there were several structure-related occurrences).
Cloud Cutter is offline  
Old 8th Mar 2014, 17:48
  #420 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: London (Babylon-on-Thames)
Age: 42
Posts: 6,168
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Some good input from actual real airline pilots, if like me you don't post in here 'cos you know you'd look a proper eejit very quickly, then might some of you consider taking the nonsense over here?
MH370 Malaysian Airlines B772 Missing Enroute KUL-PEK Part 4 — Civil Aviation Forum | Airliners.net
Skipness One Echo is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.