Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Rumours & News
Reload this Page >

A Fokker 27 loses it's propeller at take-off in Paris (CDG)

Rumours & News Reporting Points that may affect our jobs or lives as professional pilots. Also, items that may be of interest to professional pilots.

A Fokker 27 loses it's propeller at take-off in Paris (CDG)

Old 26th Oct 2013, 12:39
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: away from home
Posts: 891
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Seems there have been quite a few of those Dart failures. At my outfit, we had one in the early eighties, as far as I can recall the low speed impeller on the left engine disintegrated as the gear was being retracted, the left gear stopped about 2/3 of the way up and was stuck that way. Both the nose gear and right main gear fully retracted which is proably what saved the aircraft. The forward part of the engine and propeller tilted forward at an angle and was really hanging on by a thread. Aircraft landed safely.

I never liked the Fokker F27. Everything that possibly could break/fail did,
electrics and pneumatics were crap.
oceancrosser is offline  
Old 26th Oct 2013, 13:53
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Australia
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I'm not a pilot but travelled many times to Guernsey on Darts in the 70's and had some interesting experiences. Went through a tropical storm though in N Queensland in one in the eighties and everything internal fell off including door to cockpit, but landed safely. If you like excitement travel on them.
garpal gumnut is offline  
Old 26th Oct 2013, 16:00
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Germany
Age: 67
Posts: 1,777
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Prop found ...
Et soudain l?avion perd une pale d?hélice - 26/10/2013 - leParisien.fr
Le Mesnil-Amelot (Seine-et-Marne) yesterday. The plane had just taken off when the accident occurred. The first blade was found in an orchard 2 km of the track, while the other part of the engine and were recovered in a cornfield near the detention center

Last edited by jcjeant; 26th Oct 2013 at 16:01.
jcjeant is offline  
Old 26th Oct 2013, 16:41
  #24 (permalink)  

"Mildly" Eccentric Stardriver
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: England
Age: 77
Posts: 4,136
Received 221 Likes on 64 Posts
water methanol never seemed to be carried in Europe and in the UK
It's a long time ago, but I logged ten years and 6,000 hours with AirUK on the F27. IIRC we carried water-meth all the time, and if the old brain cells aren't totally dead, 15 gal per side. Two take-offs @ 6gal and one go-around @ 3gal.

I never liked the Fokker F27. Everything that possibly could break/fail did,
electrics and pneumatics were crap.
Disagree. Treat the old girl properly and she'd take you through anything.
Herod is offline  
Old 26th Oct 2013, 18:42
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Wor Yerm
Age: 68
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Air UK used to put water methanol in the F27s at STN...
...and at SOU, JER, GCI, ABZ and everywhere else there were engineers. At SOU and GCI it had to be used on most take-offs and at other stations it all depended. From memory, Herod's figures are about right and we regularly had to account for W/M in order not to exceed our MLW. But I think reliability was questionable. The age of these things meant that tailplanes became loose (G-BYOD), the pneums escaped, spiders, rats and flies got trapped in places you never knew existed. The engines were thirsty (even Mod 1830) but reasonably reliable but overall, they were somewhat over-built. I'm therefore quite shocked to hear one has shed a prop.
Piltdown Man is offline  
Old 26th Oct 2013, 19:52
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: CYZV
Age: 77
Posts: 1,256
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
The only time we ever armed W/M on approach was if we would have been WAT limited on a missed approach but since our max landing weight was 40,000 lbs that would have been a rare occurrence. Mind you, this was the Fairchild built machine with RDa529 engines and not the Fokker aircraft.

Treat the old girl properly and she'd take you through anything.
Agreed. We operated at temperatures that sometimes dipped below -40 on the ground and the airplane always served us in good stead. Nordair ran the lateral DEW Line resupply out of Frobisher Bay with the Fairchild 227 for years, with the airplane never seeing the inside of a hangar for two weeks at a time. As for the RR Dart, the only thing it had trouble digesting was a tungsten steel shroud nut.
pigboat is offline  
Old 27th Oct 2013, 01:07
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: away from home
Posts: 891
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Aahh Pigboat, vital difference between the F227 and the Fokker F27 was the hydraulics vs the pneumatic system especially where you were operating. The pneumatics did not like cold weather! Nor did it heat up very well up front, sometimes sitting with blankets up front in the Arctic!

Last edited by oceancrosser; 27th Oct 2013 at 01:08.
oceancrosser is offline  
Old 27th Oct 2013, 01:36
  #28 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: CYZV
Age: 77
Posts: 1,256
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
You mean the 227 did not have pneumatically operated gear, nosewheel steering and brakes?
pigboat is offline  
Old 27th Oct 2013, 01:48
  #29 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: away from home
Posts: 891
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Well apologies if I am incorrect but I actually thought the Fairchilds had a hydraulic system for these. Never flew them, but we used the US Airways Fairchild simulator in Pittsburgh. Very different to say the least, but it has been 28 years since I left that thing.
oceancrosser is offline  
Old 27th Oct 2013, 01:50
  #30 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Luton
Posts: 60
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Trust me, l used to be a vicar, that heap belongs to WDL freshly dug up

from it`s graveyard in Cologne.

Seems it didn`t go too well.
10Watt is offline  
Old 27th Oct 2013, 03:50
  #31 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: CYZV
Age: 77
Posts: 1,256
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Some Fairchilds had hydraulic nose wheel steering, there was a little reservoir attached to the steering unit. That may have been the case with the 227, I never flew them. The handful of F-27's I did fly all had the Kidde pneumatic system. The three 227's Nordair operated went to Malmo Aviation.

We also used USAir in PIT. If that Howard Johnson's motel across from the old terminal could talk I'm sure it would have some interesting tales.
pigboat is offline  
Old 27th Oct 2013, 06:33
  #32 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Great Southern Land
Age: 72
Posts: 511
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Treat the old girl properly and she'd take you through anything.
I totally agree, I did over 2000hrs on them with Air Anglia (which became Air UK) in the mid 70s and never had any trouble. However having said that, an F27 today would be getting a little long in the tooth.

Last edited by Offchocks; 27th Oct 2013 at 06:35.
Offchocks is offline  
Old 27th Oct 2013, 09:15
  #33 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: 4DME
Posts: 2,918
Likes: 0
Received 12 Likes on 10 Posts
Interesting to see what else came off with the prop, photograph seems to show the gearbox and other mangled bits, three blades visable.

45 years old.
N707ZS is offline  
Old 27th Oct 2013, 09:18
  #34 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Reading, UK
Posts: 15,809
Received 199 Likes on 92 Posts
However having said that, an F27 today would be getting a little long in the tooth.
45 years old, to be precise, in this case.
DaveReidUK is offline  
Old 27th Oct 2013, 10:45
  #35 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: South of France
Posts: 85
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The Dart engine on the HS 748 that exploded at STN was 37 years old!
Fangio is offline  
Old 27th Oct 2013, 11:12
  #36 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Europe
Posts: 1,416
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It would seem that a blade came off, followed by the remainder of the whole assembly. Is that a valid conclusion?

If so, was the separation of the remaining assembly the result of the blade coming off, and nothing else, or was there a single cause for the whole incident?

The F27s I knew (400/600s) were roundly abused on demanding rough field operations, short sectors, high temperatures and humidity, and rarely let us down.

I suspect that recovering from the loss of a blade through the cabin followed by the loss of the remainder of the prop and part of the engine, and then making a successful approach and landing, was a quite challenging piece of flying that may not have been practised in a SIM, but was the outcome of years of experience and the skills acquired in that way.

Last edited by Capot; 27th Oct 2013 at 12:40.
Capot is offline  
Old 27th Oct 2013, 12:30
  #37 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: 4DME
Posts: 2,918
Likes: 0
Received 12 Likes on 10 Posts
Looks like this F27 has done this job in France all of its life. We shall have to wait for the investigation report.
N707ZS is offline  
Old 27th Oct 2013, 18:44
  #38 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Florida
Posts: 4,569
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Interesting to see what else came off with the prop, photograph seems to show the gearbox and other mangled bits, three blades visable.
seems way too much for a prop blade failure
lomapaseo is offline  
Old 28th Oct 2013, 23:47
  #39 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: FR
Posts: 477
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Capot
It would seem that a blade came off, followed by the remainder of the whole assembly. Is that a valid conclusion?
Certainly. Here is a picture of the fuselage:

https://twitter.com/AviationSafety/s.../photo/1/large
AlphaZuluRomeo is offline  
Old 29th Oct 2013, 00:20
  #40 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: North of CDG
Posts: 1,042
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
ASN Aircraft accident Fokker F-27 Friendship 500F I-MLVT Paris-Charles de Gaulle Airport (CDG)

Cheers
FougaMagister is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.