Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Rumours & News
Reload this Page >

A330 AIR BERLIN INCIDENT IN HKT

Wikiposts
Search
Rumours & News Reporting Points that may affect our jobs or lives as professional pilots. Also, items that may be of interest to professional pilots.

A330 AIR BERLIN INCIDENT IN HKT

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 21st Dec 2012, 04:14
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: VTBS
Posts: 27
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
A330 AIR BERLIN INCIDENT IN HKT

At HKT Airport on 20-Dec-12, ~2130LT, Air Berlin A330 Departure from HKT, then request air turn back for Emergency landing cause Engine 1 fire!.

A/C made a hard landing and 3 of main wheels burst. AOT declare Runway closure due to unable to move a/c off the runway.
greenspinner is offline  
Old 21st Dec 2012, 04:55
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: nowhere
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I wonder if they did an overweight landing. I was told that on my craft, the autopilot is not approved for overweight landings. Is this pretty much standard among airliners.
JammedStab is offline  
Old 21st Dec 2012, 05:00
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 1997
Location: 5530N
Posts: 845
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Refer to QRH- airbus mention from memory non certified but you can do an o/weight Ldg upto 227t?
Bearcat is offline  
Old 21st Dec 2012, 05:01
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 1998
Location: between 20 & 30 000'
Posts: 80
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I'm not sure what the autopilot approval has to do with this.

last I checked pilots were trained to manually fly aircraft, or have the standards dropped so low that the a/p has to be used for everything.
gtseraf is offline  
Old 21st Dec 2012, 06:06
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 1998
Posts: 230
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Bit difficult to do an autoland RWY 27 when the localiser is offset by about 2 degrees from the runway course
alidad is offline  
Old 21st Dec 2012, 06:22
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: MNL ex CCR ex CLE
Age: 65
Posts: 201
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
" Last I checked pilots were trained to manually fly aircraft, or have the standards dropped so low that the a/p has to be used for everything. "

Unfortunately, Gtseraf, seems they have in many cases. Check the thread on the temorary loss of control because the captain didn't have an operable FD.....
PA-28-180 is offline  
Old 21st Dec 2012, 06:24
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: In the mountains of Switzerland
Posts: 80
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Bit difficult to do an autoland RWY 27 when the localiser is offset by about 2 degrees from the runway course
...and is CAT I only...
DouglasFlyer is offline  
Old 21st Dec 2012, 06:25
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Holland
Age: 47
Posts: 282
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
You can do an overweight landing on the autopilot but one of the items mentioned in the QRH is that the rate of descend on touch down can not exceed 360 ft/min.
Coastrider26 is offline  
Old 21st Dec 2012, 07:22
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: In the mountains of Switzerland
Posts: 80
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Our QRH A-333 says in the chapter "overweight landing":

"An overweight landing is authorized up to MTOW.
Automatic landing is certified up to Maximum Landing Weight (MLW). Autoland flight tests have, however, been successful up to 229 tons.
Depending on the situation (e.g. emergency or other) and provided that the runway is approved for automatic landing, the flight crew can decide to perform a autoland up to 229 tons."

In my opinion you have to have a good reason to conduct a AL with overweight - i think it wouldn't be good airmanship to try it on a CAT I ILS with an offset LOC...
DouglasFlyer is offline  
Old 21st Dec 2012, 07:38
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 379
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
there is no reason at all to do an autoland anyway
joe two is offline  
Old 21st Dec 2012, 07:48
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: In the mountains of Switzerland
Posts: 80
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
...fog... ?
DouglasFlyer is offline  
Old 21st Dec 2012, 08:38
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: up north
Posts: 280
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Was it foggy?
Did they do an auto land?
We're they overweight?
Have I missed something?
MANTHRUST is offline  
Old 21st Dec 2012, 08:43
  #13 (permalink)  
Per Ardua ad Astraeus
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 18,579
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
How CAN we have a thread without the 'METAR Poster'?
BOAC is offline  
Old 21st Dec 2012, 08:50
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Milano
Age: 53
Posts: 460
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Can I run for the position of 'AvHerald poster' instead?

Incident: Air Berlin A332 at Phuket on Dec 20th 2012, engine fire

Last edited by Dg800; 21st Dec 2012 at 08:51.
Dg800 is offline  
Old 21st Dec 2012, 08:54
  #15 (permalink)  
Per Ardua ad Astraeus
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 18,579
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
You got it T&C are crap.mind you, but STILL no actual
BOAC is offline  
Old 21st Dec 2012, 10:58
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Extreme
Posts: 315
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
HKT 09 has RNAV, VOR or visual approach. 27 has RNAV, offset ILS, VOR or visual approach. Ergo auto land not possible.
Please, no more mention of auto land.
Shot Nancy is offline  
Old 21st Dec 2012, 11:48
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: York
Posts: 737
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Tyres normally burst due to excess energy (heat) being applied to the brakes during deceleration after landing. Not purely by any overweight issues. A wind report (available to the investigation team) will assist in explaining any decelaration 'issues'. It may also give an indication as to why the crew took off from 27, and landed on 09. As the pax did not evacuate on the runway (but are reported to have used mobile stairs) an unextinguishable fire, requiring immediate landing, looks unlikely?

Last edited by 4468; 21st Dec 2012 at 11:50.
4468 is offline  
Old 21st Dec 2012, 16:36
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: UK
Age: 83
Posts: 3,788
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Dear God; why would anyone in their right mind even attempt to do an autoland in these circumstances?
JW411 is offline  
Old 21st Dec 2012, 18:24
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 1999
Location: world
Posts: 3,424
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Dear God; why would anyone in their right mind even attempt to do an autoland in these circumstances?
They didn't, so it's irrelevant!
Hotel Tango is offline  
Old 21st Dec 2012, 22:25
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: formally Alamo battleground, now the crocodile with palm trees!
Posts: 960
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Question

Dear God; why would anyone in their right mind even attempt to do an autoland in these circumstances?

They didn't, so it's irrelevant!
Is it really irrelevant, or does it show the lack of common sense these days?
Squawk7777 is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.