Another Air France incident
Air France's safety record is worse than what it seems. Some accidents do not pop up in the statistics because:
1. there were no fatalities
and
2. the aircraft was not scrapped, but eventually returned to service.
You will only be able to find any information on certain incidents/accidents when you specifically know what you are looking for.
Notable examples:
- Runway overrun on 13th June 1995 at Delhi Airport
- Tahiti aquaplaning 12th september 1993
- Serious incident during takeoff run at Lagos, Nigeria, 11 jan 2010
http://www.skybrary.aero/index.php/B...,_2010_(RE_HF)
1. there were no fatalities
and
2. the aircraft was not scrapped, but eventually returned to service.
You will only be able to find any information on certain incidents/accidents when you specifically know what you are looking for.
Notable examples:
- Runway overrun on 13th June 1995 at Delhi Airport
- Tahiti aquaplaning 12th september 1993
- Serious incident during takeoff run at Lagos, Nigeria, 11 jan 2010
http://www.skybrary.aero/index.php/B...,_2010_(RE_HF)
Last edited by fox niner; 20th Oct 2012 at 05:46.
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Europe
Posts: 172
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
About the AF A319 in Sofia:
I understand small mistakes but this is a HUGE mistake that could have made an accident (if small aircraft on twy H).
They were at night? So the runway lights should be clearly visible and WHITE; not blue and green as on a twy. Of course we don't know everything about this serious mishap but the result is that with a vis of 4K at night they made this HUGE mistake: it could have killed many people; remember SQ 744 in 2000 in Taipei: 83 fatalities when taking-off from a closed runway in bad weather. I heard the CVR: no taxy briefing, no correct runway identification at line-up; same with Air France that day in Sofia?
I understand small mistakes but this is a HUGE mistake that could have made an accident (if small aircraft on twy H).
They were at night? So the runway lights should be clearly visible and WHITE; not blue and green as on a twy. Of course we don't know everything about this serious mishap but the result is that with a vis of 4K at night they made this HUGE mistake: it could have killed many people; remember SQ 744 in 2000 in Taipei: 83 fatalities when taking-off from a closed runway in bad weather. I heard the CVR: no taxy briefing, no correct runway identification at line-up; same with Air France that day in Sofia?
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: SE Asia
Age: 39
Posts: 137
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
oh well..i guess the crew will just get called in for a cold coffee ,quick Gitanes and a stale croissant without jam..then a typical gallic shrug of the shoulders (you know, that one with the special facial expression )..and back to work ..no problem eh ?
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: nowhere
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Instead of the competent/incompetent argument between the skygods and others, perhaps just best to ask ourselves what we are doing to prevent such an occurrence to ourselves at a tricky airport plus any other airport.
At my company, we are verbally saying such things as Runway 36L verified prior to entering a runway and it is also a checklist call. It is also best to check lights/paint when lining up. Blue/green lights are bad. White lights are good for confirming on a runway. Yellow paint bad, white paint good. Threshold numbers the best.
Plus we use the localizer(if possible) and heading for runway confirmation on low vis takeoffs.
If it is not your SOP, I'm sure most of it can still be done by silently.
At my company, we are verbally saying such things as Runway 36L verified prior to entering a runway and it is also a checklist call. It is also best to check lights/paint when lining up. Blue/green lights are bad. White lights are good for confirming on a runway. Yellow paint bad, white paint good. Threshold numbers the best.
Plus we use the localizer(if possible) and heading for runway confirmation on low vis takeoffs.
If it is not your SOP, I'm sure most of it can still be done by silently.
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: ISTANBUL
Posts: 81
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I think the problem is not comlplying with standard procedures.
Because like most of you say I am sure they had the rwy confirmation rule, they did know the white light or blue light meaning etc. etc.
Because like most of you say I am sure they had the rwy confirmation rule, they did know the white light or blue light meaning etc. etc.
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Germany
Age: 67
Posts: 1,777
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The problem with Air France is that when a pilot is incompetent .. one in the other seat is too!
AF has two scheduled flights per day in Sofia
The runway is 5 years old
What should be more for don't confuse runway and taxiway ?
Answer:
Two competent pilots
AF has two scheduled flights per day in Sofia
The runway is 5 years old
What should be more for don't confuse runway and taxiway ?
Answer:
Two competent pilots
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Wor Yerm
Age: 68
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Yellow paint bad, white paint good.
Come on chaps, let's get rid of pointless additional checks and crap arse-covering briefings. Just do the basics and do them properly. Briefings should be very simple - a basic intent and then highlight of the BIG risks. In the past I have been bored rigid with ludicrous drivel which near enough goes down to the colour of the bloody ink and the thickness of the paper.
Less is more (from the KISS principle).
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Europe
Posts: 172
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Jammedstab: very good point. If it's not in your SOP still do it in your head: yes.
Every available clue should be used to check and re-check you will be leaving from a runway and the correct one.
Every available clue should be used to check and re-check you will be leaving from a runway and the correct one.
Join Date: Mar 1999
Location: Australia
Age: 53
Posts: 207
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Not sure what AF are using but there are a number of aircraft and or operators that have a long checklist which gets run during line up (my current one has nine checklist items).
This is the problem with adding a check each time an error happens. You end up missing the forest for the trees. Instead of concentrating on the big picture you are trying to complete a checklist correctly.
This is the problem with adding a check each time an error happens. You end up missing the forest for the trees. Instead of concentrating on the big picture you are trying to complete a checklist correctly.
Last edited by Roger Greendeck; 20th Oct 2012 at 23:45.
Originally Posted by Hotel Tango
Well, if that's your standard of competency it's time for me to stop flying! In my book a COMPETENT pilot should not make such an INCOMPETENT mistake as this.
However, I would be first to admit that there are legions of PPRuNers absolutely incapable of taking off from wrong runway or taxiway.
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Stansted
Posts: 210
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Our airline now say taxying is a 'critical phase of flight' i.e. sterile cockpit applies - no non operational chat.
Would love to hear the cockpit tapes from AF at Sofia see how what the chat was prior to take off.............
Distractions have been proven to be one of the biggest factors in accidents/incidents.
Eg Spanair MAD jumpseating cc in cockpit and non operational chat prior to take off. Not necessarily the cause but a fact. No flaps and the rest is history.
Would love to hear the cockpit tapes from AF at Sofia see how what the chat was prior to take off.............
Distractions have been proven to be one of the biggest factors in accidents/incidents.
Eg Spanair MAD jumpseating cc in cockpit and non operational chat prior to take off. Not necessarily the cause but a fact. No flaps and the rest is history.
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: FR
Posts: 477
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Not quite enough, if I may...
Qantas has no known fatalities since 1951 (which is impressive, I grant you).
But due to its age (again, impressive), one can't hope to write "Qantas is an airline with zero accident rates" and be right about it.
Qantas has no known fatalities since 1951 (which is impressive, I grant you).
But due to its age (again, impressive), one can't hope to write "Qantas is an airline with zero accident rates" and be right about it.
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: UK
Posts: 166
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Quantas has historically flown a predominantly long haul operation with long periods of low risk cruise and significantly less exposure to the higher risk take off and landing phases of flight. It is not, therefore, surprising to find them at the better end of the league tables. Lies, damn lies and statistics etc.