PPRuNe Forums

Go Back   PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Rumours & News
Forgotten your Username/Password?


Rumours & News Reporting Points that may affect our jobs or lives as professional pilots. Also, items that may be of interest to professional pilots.


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 28th Aug 2012, 18:25   #1 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: England
Posts: 468
Air Uganda, crew forgot to set flaps?



Last edited by 750XL; 28th Aug 2012 at 18:26.
750XL is offline   Reply
Old 28th Aug 2012, 18:33   #2 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Choroni, sometimes
Posts: 1,992
Ooooops....
hetfield is offline   Reply
Old 28th Aug 2012, 18:37   #3 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: At times all at sea
Age: 65
Posts: 68
53 seconds?
wetbehindear is offline   Reply
Old 28th Aug 2012, 18:45   #4 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: MIA
Posts: 7
checklist? what's that?

Great idea! Really cuts drag between brake release and V1, resulting in a shorter takeoff roll by, ohhh, say....35 feet.
mach2.6 is offline   Reply
Old 28th Aug 2012, 18:46   #5 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Tring, UK
Posts: 800
They'd obviously read on PPRuNe about the short-field technique (and I'm giving the benefit of the doubt here by calling it a technique) of deploying the flaps during the takeoff roll.

Move on, nothing to see...
FullWings is offline   Reply
Old 28th Aug 2012, 18:58   #6 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Not far from a Great Lake
Age: 71
Posts: 914
Reminds me of the time I was a SLF on a Navy C-9 at NQX and they made a no flap takeoff!

I don't know to this day whether or not that was an allowed configuration, but somehow, I doubt it was. At least they handled it well, but we were really moving at liftoff.
Machinbird is offline   Reply
Old 28th Aug 2012, 19:05   #7 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Choroni, sometimes
Posts: 1,992
Quote:
of deploying the flaps during the takeoff roll.
Wasn't it AF 707 many moons ago who did that?
hetfield is offline   Reply
Old 28th Aug 2012, 19:13   #8 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Wherever it is this month
Posts: 570
Perhaps the SLF should have told the cabin staff about it
Easy Street is offline   Reply
Old 28th Aug 2012, 19:15   #9 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Choroni, sometimes
Posts: 1,992
The SLF just care about cheap tix.

But maybe the T/O config warning was in a working state opposite to Spanair accident, same reason.
hetfield is offline   Reply
Old 28th Aug 2012, 19:16   #10 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Texas
Age: 53
Posts: 2,007
Based on that video clip, it was 15 seconds from beginning of forward movement to beginning of flaps beginning to lower.

I seem to recall a 727, Delta, in DFW, (Corrected to 1988!) that didn't lower flaps on takeoff ... flight ended in tears.

Delta 1141. One would hope that the lesson learned from that crash might be standard training fodder.

Last edited by Lonewolf_50; 28th Aug 2012 at 19:24.
Lonewolf_50 is offline   Reply
Old 28th Aug 2012, 20:03   #11 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: London (Babylon-on-Thames)
Age: 32
Posts: 4,123
Always surprises me that I have photos of two seperate US Airways B767-200s heading across the pond departing with no flaps !
Had I been on board I suspect I would have been bricking it!
Skipness One Echo is offline   Reply
Old 28th Aug 2012, 20:06   #12 (permalink)
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: South East
Age: 35
Posts: 8
What's that light spot thingy on the ground that moves from the piano keys towards the trailing edge between 12-17 seconds on the film??
tchaikovsky is offline   Reply
Old 28th Aug 2012, 20:07   #13 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Choroni, sometimes
Posts: 1,992
Don't know 767,

but on A300 taking off with flaps was very seldom, mostly just slats.
hetfield is offline   Reply
Old 28th Aug 2012, 20:09   #14 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Under the clouds now
Age: 75
Posts: 1,451
Nairobi - November 1974 - Lufthansa 747 crashed after take-off because crew failed to set LE flaps.
brakedwell is online now   Reply
Old 28th Aug 2012, 20:13   #15 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Rockytop, Tennessee, USA
Posts: 2,341
Quote:
Always surprises me that I have photos of two seperate US Airways B767-200s heading across the pond departing with no flaps !
Had I been on board I suspect I would have been bricking it!
I realize that you may possibly not be a pilot but flaps 1 is a legal takeoff setting in the 767. The flaps stay up but the slats are extended to the takeoff position.

Here's an example on a takeoff out of PHL:

Airbubba is offline   Reply
Old 28th Aug 2012, 20:16   #16 (permalink)
PJ2
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: East of the sun, West of the moon
Posts: 2,055
Likely flaps/slats were set when the takeoff configuration warning horn probably sounded as the thrust levers were set for TO thrust.

Re, ". . . nothing to see", that's exactly the outcome the system was designed for so there's a great deal to see. The system worked as designed and likely prevented another Spanair.
PJ2 is offline   Reply
Old 28th Aug 2012, 20:56   #17 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: UK
Posts: 49
What are the advantages of a flapless or reduced flap takeoff and when would you elect to carry one out?

Same for landing config?

Last edited by orion1210; 28th Aug 2012 at 20:57.
orion1210 is offline   Reply
Old 28th Aug 2012, 21:00   #18 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Rockytop, Tennessee, USA
Posts: 2,341
Quote:
Likely flaps/slats were set when the takeoff configuration warning horn probably sounded as the thrust levers were set for TO thrust.
That is probably how it has been handled many times in the 'old days' here in the U.S. Often the takeoff checklist itself was completed on the roll by 80 knots.

However in these enlightened times with FOQA, FDM, ASAP and all the rest you are probably better off to do a low speed reject, find out for sure why the horn went off, put it in the logbook or not depending on the carrier and try it again after being sure you don't need a sign off. And do a mea culpa with all crewmembers on ASAP and NASA reports to CYA.

Moving the flap lever on the takeoff roll on a modern plane causes all heck to break loose with the warnings as these guys at Charlie West found out:

Pilots Engaged in Small Talk Before Jet Botched Takeoff - WSJ.com

The Captain moved the flap lever from flaps 8 to flaps 20 on the takeoff roll and botched a reject over V1, but was saved by the crunchy EMAS at the end of the mountaintop runway.
Airbubba is offline   Reply
Old 28th Aug 2012, 21:26   #19 (permalink)
Nemo Me Impune Lacessit
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Victoria, Australia.
Posts: 2,798
We used to do flapless in the Middle East on the BN2 Islander as it gave a higher speed at rotation and we were slightly better off if we lost an engine. Nothing illegal about a flapless takeoff if it can be done safely, within the AFM and SOPs.
parabellum is offline   Reply
Old 28th Aug 2012, 21:27   #20 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Texas
Age: 53
Posts: 2,007
OK:
Quote:
Actually the lesson learned from the DFW 727 was ...never rotate beyond normal takeoff attitude with 6000' of runway remaining. They were within 8 or so knots of 'flying', even no flap. (additional lesson was don't pull the takeoff warning CB to cross the 'zulu' bridge)
PJ
Quote:
Likely flaps/slats were set when the takeoff configuration warning horn probably sounded as the thrust levers were set for TO thrust.
Re, ". . . nothing to see", that's exactly the outcome the system was designed for so there's a great deal to see.
Thank you both.
Lonewolf_50 is offline   Reply
 
 
This ad will disappear if you login
Reply
 


Thread Tools


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT. The time now is 09:44.


vBulletin® v3.8.7, Copyright ©2000-2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
SEO by vBSEO 3.6.1
© 1996-2012 The Professional Pilots Rumour Network

As these are anonymous forums the origins of the contributions may be opposite to what may be apparent. In fact the press may use it, or the unscrupulous, or sciolists*, to elicit certain reactions.

*"sciolist"... Noun, archaic. "a person who pretends to be knowledgeable and well informed".