Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Rumours & News
Reload this Page >

A Sukhoi superjet 100 is missing

Wikiposts
Search
Rumours & News Reporting Points that may affect our jobs or lives as professional pilots. Also, items that may be of interest to professional pilots.

A Sukhoi superjet 100 is missing

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 1st Jan 2013, 01:16
  #721 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Germany
Age: 67
Posts: 1,777
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I can assure you that it's not a translation. There is only one final report released and it's in English. All of the aviation accident reports produced by the NTSC in recent times have been in English, even domestic accidents and incidents.
I can assure you that it's a translation of a draft (not published) written in the native language of the country
Or .. if it's not a translation .. this mean that all the investigators and administrative personnel involved have english as mother language ... and this is practically impossible

Last edited by jcjeant; 1st Jan 2013 at 01:21.
jcjeant is offline  
Old 1st Jan 2013, 03:43
  #722 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Jungle
Posts: 638
Received 14 Likes on 10 Posts
Originally Posted by jcjeant
Hi,
Or .. if it's not a translation .. this mean that all the investigators and administrative personnel involved have english as mother language ... and this is practically impossible
Going by your own logic, since you are from Germany, then, did you write your reply to this post in German and then translate it to English before posting? Or did you learn how to speak English and therefore are capable of independently reading and writing in English? Anyway, this is getting off topic. The fact of the matter is, the NTSC has published one report and it is in English. And the same goes for all other aviation incident and accident reports I've read from the NTSC in recent times.
smiling monkey is offline  
Old 1st Jan 2013, 06:51
  #723 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Oakland, CA
Age: 72
Posts: 427
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
IF the pilot had taken the same route as he did in the morning

IF they'd flown from Sukarno-hata and not Halim......
Actually I would replace those with something a lot more basic - something not connected with a mere 'chance':

If the crew had a map of terrain they were flying over. There was a navigator aboard and he did not even bother to have an aeronautical chart of the area, makes you wonder what he was paid for.

Last edited by olasek; 1st Jan 2013 at 07:15.
olasek is offline  
Old 2nd Jan 2013, 10:05
  #724 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: London
Posts: 7,072
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
plus the fact that they'd been in the same rough area earlier in the day - those volcanoes are BIG and can be seen in the morning fro well over 100 kms away

to go low level in cloudy conditions when you know there are big mountains around is pretty stupid
Heathrow Harry is offline  
Old 2nd Jan 2013, 17:20
  #725 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Spain
Age: 82
Posts: 490
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I can assure you that it's not a translation. There is only one final report released and it's in English.
Once again my apologies, although, with respect, the grammar is somewhat wanting.
Sunnyjohn is offline  
Old 2nd Jan 2013, 19:16
  #726 (permalink)  
Pegase Driver
 
Join Date: May 1997
Location: Europe
Age: 73
Posts: 3,669
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
to go low level in cloudy conditions when you know there are big mountains around is pretty stupid
I was wondering that one too, as the report indicates they had only an High altitude en route IFR map not showing terrain, and not a visual map .

But if you read the CVR carefully , from 07:30 44 the Capt says " No problem with terrain at this moment " the guest replies : yeah , it is flat " could indicate the Capt knew there was terrain around.
They only planned to fly 20NM around the VOR and there is indeed no problem in that area.
What was not planned is the fact that the aircraft left the plannned orbit which was above flat ground unoticed by the crew.(demonstrating a Holding input on the FMC ) and headed towards teh mountain.
The rest of the conversations show a crew confused as to which heading they should take to return to Halim , which ironically is also the location of the VOR they are tuned on !
Difficult to understand .
ATC Watcher is offline  
Old 2nd Jan 2013, 19:21
  #727 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Choroni, sometimes
Posts: 1,974
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Difficult to understand .
No!

Not at all.

Can't maintain VFR?

Pull up.
hetfield is offline  
Old 2nd Jan 2013, 19:32
  #728 (permalink)  
Pegase Driver
 
Join Date: May 1997
Location: Europe
Age: 73
Posts: 3,669
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hetfield : You mean VMC surely. But it is irrelevant as they were flying IFR and never announced/requested to continue visually.

What I meant by "Difficult to understand" was in relation to my last sentence : Why they were confused as to where to go to get back and did not notice the aircraft flew the opposite direction they wanted to with a VOR tuned on the airfield.

Why the accident occurred is obvious and easy to understand after reading the report
ATC Watcher is offline  
Old 3rd Jan 2013, 10:47
  #729 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: London
Posts: 7,072
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
"Once again my apologies, although, with respect, the grammar is somewhat wanting."

so is my Indonesian.............
Heathrow Harry is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.