Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Rumours & News
Reload this Page >

Turkish Airlines B777 Emergency Evacuation at LTBA

Wikiposts
Search
Rumours & News Reporting Points that may affect our jobs or lives as professional pilots. Also, items that may be of interest to professional pilots.

Turkish Airlines B777 Emergency Evacuation at LTBA

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 4th Dec 2010, 05:26
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: LHR
Posts: 20
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Turkish Airlines B777 Emergency Evacuation at LTBA

A TK B777 300 was lined up for take off last night (03/12/10 at approx 22:35z) at Istanbul's 17L, when after not having moving for a while the strobes were switched off and shortly afterwards the aircraft slides blew on the left hand side only.

Passengers and crew all safe with what looked like no major injuries.

Was informed by ATC that they had a cargo hold fire indication.

Runway blocked for some time whilst the slides were disconnected and the aircraft towed away.

Was sat in one of the aircraft back in the queue waiting for departure when this took place.

Last edited by BusDriver947; 4th Dec 2010 at 05:38.
BusDriver947 is offline  
Old 4th Dec 2010, 07:07
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Nanaimo
Age: 75
Posts: 34
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Boeing's unequivocal instruction is to treat all fire and smoke warnings SERIOUSLY; no second guessing, trying to be arsey smarty! You can come to grief mighty quickly if you insist on being a smart alec
totempole is offline  
Old 4th Dec 2010, 07:56
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Too far from the equator
Posts: 745
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Excuse me Mr Unhooked , since when do ATC and 'other aircraft ' advise the Captain of an aircraft that they have a hold fire ?
Obviously you know nothing about hold fires / extinguishing etc , so . ergo , you are NOT an aviation type person ?
Read it all up on the interweb and get back to me when you are more of an expert than when you wrote this ***** .
kotakota is offline  
Old 4th Dec 2010, 08:25
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Gulf playing Golf
Posts: 1,141
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Well done to the crew. Good safe decision When in doubt there is no doubt..
Payscale is offline  
Old 4th Dec 2010, 09:14
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 2,044
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Our company policy is you evacuate for a confirmed unextinquished fire. It does not follow you require those to evacuate... as above, "if in doubt..." may apply.

NoD
NigelOnDraft is offline  
Old 4th Dec 2010, 11:12
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: USA
Age: 66
Posts: 2,183
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I trust the hold fire was confirmed by ATC

Nothing to do with us(ATC).The crew make the decision...we send the fire trucks and deal with traffic issues.


Maybe Jar-Ops(MSN Flightsim) states differently
eastern wiseguy is offline  
Old 4th Dec 2010, 11:26
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Classified
Posts: 123
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Payscale:
Be careful with evacuations: Evacs from widebody aircraft that have the main deck 5M off the ground or more can be very dangerous. You don't throw people down the slides lightly - there is a good chance that at least one of the pax will have a heart attack or go down the slide head first - they all listen to the safety briefing.........not.

Giving the order to evacuate in a widebody has (i'm guestimating here) a 70% chance of causing a death due to "misadventure".

QF in SIN did not evacuate - the pax were kept on board for an hour. No doubt the above figured in the Capts. decision. I grant you he had no cargo fire warning but, in my opinion, if on the ground you would look for postive secondary indications before popping the slides I would have thought.

my 2c worth
D.Lamination is offline  
Old 4th Dec 2010, 11:45
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Luton
Posts: 31
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Mr Unhooked....how would ATC see if there was a fire in the hold of an airliner? geez by the time they could see half the aircraft would have been destroyed...
clipstone1 is offline  
Old 4th Dec 2010, 11:51
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: se uk
Posts: 39
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Looking for positive secondary indications would usually mean opening the hold, not a good idea with pax still on board, if I remember correctly, giving a fire access to vast amounts of fresh air is a bad thing.
moonburn is offline  
Old 4th Dec 2010, 12:26
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: all arround..
Posts: 18
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
actually there was no fire or smoke or any traces of it afterwards..

fire and rescue is at their position etc..

stairs could be used while other slides remain armed CC ready for full evac.

lucky one, only 30 minor injuries out of 284 on board.
seckin is offline  
Old 4th Dec 2010, 13:17
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: hampshire
Posts: 20
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Excuse me Mr Unhooked , since when do ATC and 'other aircraft ' advise the Captain of an aircraft that they have a hold fire ?
Obviously you know nothing about hold fires / extinguishing etc , so . ergo , you are NOT an aviation type person ?
Read it all up on the interweb and get back to me when you are more of an expert than when you wrote this ***** .
A little harsh don't you think?

As flight crew we are paid to use all available resources to make decisions in a safety based environment, to me this means asking ATC if they see anything abnormal (good viz and pointing in the right direction dependent), speak to cabin crew, get fire services to come and use heat seeking equipment if available, use trained eyes in other aircraft, all if time allows of course.

Not knowing the circumstances of this one its difficult to say but i wouldn't evacuate immediately on the strength of a EICAS\ECAM alone, as mentioned earlier it can injure/kill people and after all if you asses you have a fire its 90s to get everyone off using half the doors.
Scapa is offline  
Old 4th Dec 2010, 13:17
  #12 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: LHR
Posts: 20
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Interesting comments one and all.

I'm sure the decision to evacuate couldn't have been an easy one to make.

There were no fire and rescue services in attendance when the doors opened and slides blew. (News reports are different). They arrived shortly after as you'd expect.

In fact I was amazed to see how many passengers made their way across the taxiway straight towards an A340 (next in line for take off) who still had it's engines running! Other's did their own thing. Not their fault, just very confusing and easy to follow the person ahead.

In time passengers were rounded up and kept together until 3 airport buses came to collect.

I've never seen or hope to see again a real evacuation, but I assure it was very scary to watch.

Last edited by BusDriver947; 4th Dec 2010 at 13:32.
BusDriver947 is offline  
Old 4th Dec 2010, 13:38
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Arizona USA
Posts: 8,571
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I trust the hold fire was confirmed by ATC or other aircraft etc before they decided to throw all the pax out
Ahhh, the young MS sim crowd comments...again.
PPRuNe really does need a 'professional verified' section for truly valid comments.
411A is offline  
Old 4th Dec 2010, 13:49
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 2,044
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Just to add re <<get fire services to come and use heat seeking equipment if available>> - our company had a Fire Service insist on opening the hold to "check" - as noted above, about the worst thing you could do if there had been a fire - I believe they went for the evac as soon as they saw the door open despite clearly instructing the fire services not to.

NB as well, your evacuation options can get limited once the Fire Services arrive, unless you can trust/liaise with them enough to leave one side clear for instance.

NoD
NigelOnDraft is offline  
Old 4th Dec 2010, 13:52
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: hampshire
Posts: 20
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
NoD

Agreed the options do become more limited but certainly at LHR the fire services have the ability to do a heat scan on the aircraft looking for hotspots remotely without opening holds etc.
Scapa is offline  
Old 4th Dec 2010, 13:55
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Cornwall-on-Hudson, New York
Posts: 875
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
"Ahhh, the young MS sim crowd comments...again.
PPRuNe really does need a 'professional verified' section for truly valid comments."

Well, he does know "pax" is short for passengers...
stepwilk is offline  
Old 4th Dec 2010, 13:57
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 2,044
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
but certainly at LHR the fire services have the ability to do a heat scan on the aircraft looking for hotspots remotely without opening holds
You can be sure I was not referring to LHR

However, it was a major European capital

NoD
NigelOnDraft is offline  
Old 4th Dec 2010, 14:53
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Cymru
Posts: 298
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
You have to bear in mind that an etops a/c should be capable of containing a cargo hold fire for 180 minutes. That's only the theory and certification of course but nevertheless it should give you the confidence to spend a few more seconds evaluating. It is a difficult command decision but I would hold out a short while for a second indication (whatever that may be) before a rushed evacuation decision. As has been pointed out an evac can have serious if not fatal consequenses for some. Shame to kill someone for a faulty indication.

Yes I know what you will say. Shame to kill a whole load for lack of a timely evac. Like I said it's a tough command decision.

Thats a command decision however, not a "spotters" decision.

TC
tightcircuit is offline  
Old 4th Dec 2010, 15:22
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: Middle England
Posts: 611
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Why do people always try to second guess? Just read the QRH intro, it could not be clearer.

"It must be stressed that for smoke that continues or a fire that cannot be positively confirmed to be completely extinguished, the earliest possible descent, landing, and evacuation must be done."

From 767 Cargo Fire QRH:

"WARNING: Inform ground personnel NOT to open any cargo door after landing until all passengers and crew have exited the airplane and fire fighting equipment is nearby."

Simples!
763 jock is offline  
Old 4th Dec 2010, 15:42
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 1,501
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Ahh, the lessons from UPS in DXB so quickly forgotten!

If you have a cargo fire warning and do an evacuation, nobody can touch you. If you don't, and people get killed, I'd say you better burn up together with your pax.

763 jock is absolutely correct! Follow the book, that is if you do know what it says. I'm not sure a lot of you on this tread do.
ManaAdaSystem is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.