PPRuNe Forums

Go Back   PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Rumours & News
Forgotten your Username/Password?
Register FAQ Calendar Advertise Mark Forums Read

Rumours & News Reporting Points that may affect our jobs or lives as professional pilots. Also, items that may be of interest to professional pilots.


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 5th November 2009, 12:16   #1 (permalink)
Everything is under control.
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Washington, D.C.
Posts: 372
BA aircraft strikes jet bridge at Washington Dulles

News story on local radio station WMAL. No links.

It is reported that BA Flight 264 struck a jet bridge at Washington Dulles around 7:30 p.m. Wednesday. The wing "nearly cut in half." No injuries.

Last edited by Eboy : 5th November 2009 at 12:31. Reason: typo
Eboy is offline   Reply
Old 5th November 2009, 12:37   #2 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Esher, Surrey
Posts: 192






DULLES AIRPORT - At Dulles Airport passengers on a plane suffered a scare during a landing. Officials confirmed a British Airways jet was damaged after reaching the ground Wednesday night.

Officials say British Airways flight 264 struck the tarmac around 7:30 p.m. They say one of the wings collided with the jet brake and caused so much damage the wing was nearly cut in half.

Airport officials none of nearly 200 passengers were hurt.
Some passengers have been stranded at the airport though. The flight was supposed to return to London Wednesday night but some passengers may not be able to make it back until Thursday.

An investigation is underway to see exactly what happened with the

Plane Landing at Dulles Damages Wing, Scares Passengers|ABC 7 News
beamender99 is online now   Reply
Old 5th November 2009, 13:44   #3 (permalink)
Junior trash
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: UK
Posts: 621
BA264 is the outbound flight number. The jet bridges are usually stowed out the way for arrival and only connected for departing pax (assuming its the same for 767) as the mobile lounges are used for disembarkation. As the incident happened 30 mins (if the timings are correct) after the aircraft parked, and there are no pax desperate to give eyewitness statements, I would suggest that the jetbridge collided with the aircraft not vice versa.
Hotel Mode is offline   Reply
Old 5th November 2009, 13:56   #4 (permalink)
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Glorious West Sussex
Age: 94
Posts: 568
The ABC video says it happened while taxying. But surely an impact which cut the wing "nearly in half" would require quite a fast taxy.......
TyroPicard is offline   Reply
Old 5th November 2009, 14:57   #5 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: EU
Posts: 148
Quote:
The jet bridges are usually stowed out the way for arrival and only connected for departing pax (assuming its the same for 767) as the mobile lounges are used for disembarkation
No. Disembarkation is via jet bridges into a waiting area and after that you enter the people carriers for the trip to immigration.
But the jetbridges are definetely used after parking.
golfyankeesierra is offline   Reply
Old 5th November 2009, 18:37   #6 (permalink)

the lunatic fringe
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 449
Quote:
struck the tarmac around 7:30 p.m. They say one of the wings collided with the jet brake and caused so much damage the wing was nearly cut in half.
That is gibberish. Rubbish reporting.
L337 is offline   Reply
Old 6th November 2009, 02:20   #7 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: california
Age: 51
Posts: 7
But anyway whats a JETBRAKE??
polax52 is offline   Reply
Old 6th November 2009, 02:27   #8 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 25
From the FAA Accident/Incident database:-

BRITISH AIRWAYS FLIGHT 265 BOEING 767, WHILE BEING MARSHALLED INTO GATE, LEFT WING TIP STRUCK THE JETWAY BRIDGE
Backoffice is offline   Reply
Old 6th November 2009, 06:32   #9 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: not far from the colonial capitol
Age: 41
Posts: 980
So we've gone from a rather serious 'landing scare' and 'wing shearing off' to a damaged tip and perhaps a nav light inop?
vapilot2004 is online now   Reply
Old 6th November 2009, 08:42   #10 (permalink)
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: UK
Posts: 339
It would seem so!

I couple years ago I was on the 293 to IAD, which arrived about 8pm. We all piled onto the plane mates as is the norm (for those who don't know, IAD use these very weird mobile lounges to take passengers around the place - search on Wikipedia for a picture). The plane mate I was on was attached to the door behind the wing (747). As such we were the last out, and the driver's wing mirror hit the back of the wing.

Absolute pandemonium ensued. The fire department, police, BA engineering... The captain and ground crew all flooded onto the scene. We didn't move an inch whilst the damage was looked at. We were taken off the plane mate, had to give our details to the police (names and first address in the states) and 45 minutes later were loaded onto a new plane mate and on to customs and immigration.

I believe there was no damage done (except perhaps to the mirror) but I'm guessing the driver - who was rather scared at the time - got a rollacking
raffele is online now   Reply
Old 6th November 2009, 08:57   #11 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Planet Earth (sometimes)
Posts: 854
raffele

"for those who don't know, IAD use these very weird mobile lounges to take passengers around the place -"

For what it's worth BA no longer routinely use the gates at IAD that require the mobile lounges to be attached to the aircraft, they use gates with jetties....
wiggy is offline   Reply
Old 6th November 2009, 09:28   #12 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: France
Age: 42
Posts: 24
Thumbs up

Vapilot. You say.
(So we've gone from a rather serious 'landing scare' and 'wing shearing off' to a damaged tip and perhaps a nav light inop?)

Just made me laugh a lot cheers......so true.....I think maybe a cup of tea was knocked over .......
Its good to laugh in these tough times....
Peter L is offline   Reply
Old 6th November 2009, 10:02   #13 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Oxford, UK
Posts: 95
I can't believe the exaggeration and baloney broadcast on that ABC news item. Talk about unsubstantiated rumours! Encounters with airbridges and baggage trucks are a routine item on AAIB bulletins, most of which are down to groundstaff error when analysed. I should imagine that the groundstaff are being paid even less than the pilots these days, and probably suffer the same decline of enthusiasm for work that is devoid of glamour and mostly isolated and out in the cold and rain.
mary meagher is offline   Reply
Old 6th November 2009, 13:14   #14 (permalink)
Moderator
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Maypole, Kent
Posts: 724
Judging by the basic comprehension (= research) and literacy skills on display here, it sounds like journalists in the U.S. don't get paid much either these days.

Maybe their professional status is headed in the same direction as Pilots'?

There's nothing about this on BA's Employee Self Service website yet and anything pilot-error related tends to be promulgated internally pretty quickly so that we might all learn from it ASAP.

I'm leaning towards Hotel Mode's theories above.
__________________
Climbing at an R.A.T.E. of 1.53 vertical seconds per foot of thrust!
beaver eager is offline   Reply
Old 6th November 2009, 15:17   #15 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: LHR/LGW
Posts: 328
The aircraft was being marshalled onto stand in the dark and one leading edge contacted an incorrectly parked airbridge. The aircraft returned to service 24 hours later after being fitted with a replacement slat section. There have been previous safety reports concerning IAD marshaller proficiency and poor visibility of ground markings.

News is the new 24 hour entertainment. If they don't hype it up and dramatize it then nobody will watch it. ----- And many of you guys would have nothing to talk about
Magplug is offline   Reply
Old 6th November 2009, 23:34   #16 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Posts: 348
Parking B767 at Washington Dulles, under Marshall's instructions (young BA engineer) the jetty driver starts moving the pier before we had stopped. The marshaller (engineer) continued to beckon us forward. Following a delay while the jetty chap moved it back to its "parked" we proceeded forward and parked.

The young engineer (marshaller) arrives on the flight deck and starts lecturing me that he was in charge and I should have followed his instructions.

A very short exchange followed.....
woodpecker is offline   Reply
Old 7th November 2009, 14:21   #17 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: London Under EGLL(LHR) 27R ILS
Age: 16
Posts: 351
G-BNWY has been in IAD since the 5th, any new if its an Insurance right off or It will return to LHR? If Im correct Isnt there a boeing factory in washington?

HeathrowAirport is offline   Reply
Old 7th November 2009, 14:37   #18 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: London (Babylon-on-Thames)
Age: 28
Posts: 1,849
Seattle, Washington.....
Skipness One Echo is offline   Reply
Old 7th November 2009, 15:02   #19 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: London Under EGLL(LHR) 27R ILS
Age: 16
Posts: 351
Ah thats impossible then. FAA wont let it do KIAD-KSEA? - I dont think BA want another Bird an Insurance right off - considering there £292 million loss announced yesterday.
HeathrowAirport is offline   Reply
Old 7th November 2009, 15:05   #20 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 42
Sounds like the Jetty was not correctly positioned from the previous departure and the incident may have occured regardless of marshaller or guidance, the line still would have been followed.

Wing tip on the B767 can be removed and replaced, if the damage is further towards the root, it could be more of a problem.

Accidents do happen.
Beeline is offline   Reply
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes


Posting Rules
vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:51.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC7
© 1996-2009 The Professional Pilots Rumour Network

As these are anonymous forums the origins of the contributions may be opposite to what may be apparent. In fact the press may use it, or the unscrupulous, or sciolists*, to elicit certain reactions.

*"sciolist"... Noun, archaic. "a person who pretends to be knowledgeable and well informed".