PPRuNe Forums

Go Back   PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Rumours & News
Forgotten your Username/Password?

Rumours & News Reporting Points that may affect our jobs or lives as professional pilots. Also, items that may be of interest to professional pilots.


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 18th Aug 2008, 15:42   #21 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Wet Coast
Posts: 2,342
Quote:
Mindless or terrorist?
Terrorist no, just another moron.

Keep checking under your bed though.
PaperTiger is offline   Reply
Old 18th Aug 2008, 16:19   #22 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: craggy island parochial house
Posts: 79
ASBO should just about cover it along with a good shoeing down the cop-shp
Capt Ted Crilly is offline   Reply
Old 18th Aug 2008, 19:02   #23 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: uk
Posts: 61
Bollox to that-attempted murder. If i stormed a flight deck and shone a l@zer into pilots eye...id be down guantanamo by end of month..
DAL208 is offline   Reply
Old 18th Aug 2008, 19:38   #24 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: uk
Posts: 1,847
Make him look into his own l@ser

Uh no then he could get a place on Big Bruvva

Sir George Cayley

ps Just thought, throw the book at him. CAP736 to be precise!
Sir George Cayley is offline   Reply
Old 18th Aug 2008, 20:13   #25 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 5,494
Precedent already set in South Australia is two years jail, and it is a felony.
Sunfish is offline   Reply
Old 18th Aug 2008, 21:03   #26 (permalink)
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 28
What if l@zers are been seen shone into the cabin?

What actions would the two up front, like passengers to do if we become aware the aircraft is being illumniated by a l@zer from the ground?
radio ears is offline   Reply
Old 18th Aug 2008, 21:11   #27 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: France
Posts: 2,299
DAL208 is right.
It's attempted murder.
Much like shoving a block of concrete off a motorway bridge through the windscreen of an oncoming car or lorry.
CJ
ChristiaanJ is offline   Reply
Old 18th Aug 2008, 23:42   #28 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Asia
Posts: 182
Why are these things still out in the public?

A nineteen-year-old can't posses a shoulder launched device can he? What's the difference with this l@ser?

Aren't they military spec green l@sers? Aren't they designed to disable the vision of the enemy?

In Las Vegas in the 90's l@ser light shows would occasionally nail a crew and nothing was done to license or punish operators of these public hazards. This has been going on for a decade now.

How long is it until another dumb dumb tries this from the same town?

These l@sers should be treated like illegal contraband and taken off the market imho.
pacplyer is offline   Reply
Old 19th Aug 2008, 00:48   #29 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Wellington,NZ
Age: 57
Posts: 1,469
Quote:
What actions would the two up front, like passenergers to do if we become aware the aircraft is being illumniated by a l@ser from the ground?
Don't look at the sodding thing. Shield the eyes.Report it to ATC. When we receive such a report, we phone the police (and warn following traffic), who take it very seriously. Unfortunately, unless there's a very good position report (unlikely unless you've stared down the beam and can somehow still actually see) and there's good help from the nearby public (usually willing, but usually don't notice l@sers originating from nearby, as they're so directional) there's often not a great deal they can do.

[EDIT] Thought you asked "what actions should the two up front take." Just re-read the question.
My answer is probably still valid, but doesn't address your question, sorry. But I would still suggest not looking at it. These things, if strong enough, can damage the eyes.
Tarq57 is offline   Reply
Old 19th Aug 2008, 01:43   #30 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Posts: 388
I suppose he comes from a broken home, was abused by his father & was only doing it for a laugh.This unfortunately plus a brief provided by the taxpayer, will most likely get him off.

Yes it is attempted murder, cut & dried no questions, but we all know he will be sent home with a smack on the wrist.
kaikohe76 is offline   Reply
Old 19th Aug 2008, 01:58   #31 (permalink)

Eight Gun Fighter
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Western Approaches
Posts: 1,072
Antone seen a photo of this scumbag?..... no, no let me guess.....

Shaved head, mouth breather, vacant look, IQ of around 55. Parents no prettier.
Rollingthunder is offline   Reply
Old 19th Aug 2008, 07:50   #32 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: LPL, UK
Posts: 377
Incidents of l@sers being shone at aircraft are very much on the increase. We were getting about one report per month until we raised the profile and then the reporting rate doubled. The reports are about 50:50 UK (our base) and Europe, so it is not just a British malaise.

Industry advice is as follows:
1. If you notice a l@ser, donít look at it. It is very tempting, but it will increase the chance of eye injury.
2. Report it to ATC immediately. They can help pinpoint the location and report it to the police. This will also warn other nearby aircraft.
3. File an ASR. On CAA advice we are classifying all l@ser incidents as MORs so that the CAA can understand the extent of the problem and maybe take action nationally.
4. If any after-effects are felt, the crew member should seek specialist medical attention.


In the UK the police will probably be very proactive since they got a successful prosecution against a Muppet who shone a l@ser at the Manchester police helicopter.
CaptainSandL is offline   Reply
Old 19th Aug 2008, 08:59   #33 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Aug 1998
Location: Ex-pat Aussie in the UK
Posts: 2,898
Since l@ser light has a specific wavelength, I wonder if anyone has thought of equipping police heli pilots with eye filters for the times they have to go hunt these idiots.
Checkboard is online now   Reply
Old 19th Aug 2008, 10:10   #34 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: UK
Posts: 211
Trouble is, there's all sorts of l@ser pointers out there, all emitting light of different wavelengths. You'd need umpteen filters to counter them all, and many of the wideband filters also restrict passage of visible light too.

Death's too good for the b@$t@rds.
Sepp is offline   Reply
Old 19th Aug 2008, 10:27   #35 (permalink)

FX Guru
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Greenwich
Age: 57
Posts: 852
What exactly are these fecking l@ser thingies for? Do they perform some sort of useful function?

Or are they something we can order shops to stop selling and no-one would be particularly aggrieved by it?

I realise that they would still be available abroad, over the web etc, but it would be a start as I think most of these attacks are spur of the moment things rather than meticulously planned.

Anyone?
angels is online now   Reply
Old 19th Aug 2008, 10:30   #36 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 321
They are useful for teachers and lecturers for pointing to particular points on a display without having to lean in front of it: hence the name, l@ser pointers. Somehow I doubt this guy is a lecturer!
CarltonBrowne the FO is offline   Reply
Old 19th Aug 2008, 10:32   #37 (permalink)

FX Guru
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Greenwich
Age: 57
Posts: 852
Luddite I know, but why not use an old fashioned pointer?! I'm sure the lecturers could live with it.
angels is online now   Reply
Old 19th Aug 2008, 10:46   #38 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: UK
Posts: 16
OK, so I'm not a pilot, but I do know a lot about l@sers.

The issue here is with the small diode l@sers that are sold as l@ser pointers, and as alignment l@sers to the construction industry. The law on these items is that they should all be below 1mW, and hence fall into safety Class 1.

Class 1 l@sers are inherently safe - in other words there is no way you can damage you eyes, no matter how long you stare into the beam. Which is why they can be sold without restrictions.

However you can find higher power diode l@sers on sale, with 5 or more mW, which pushes them into Class 2 or even 3a. These you do have to be careful of, as they can do damage if you stare into the beam. This is quite hard to do in practice as you tend to blink and look away as the light light hurts, long before it actually damages you eyes. Even l@ser light spreads out as it travels (the narrowest l@ser spot we can put on the moon is five times with width of the moon!), so the damage peters out in a few metres.

Every so often Trading Standards cracks down on the illegal sale of Class 2 and 3a l@sers as l@ser pointers, but given the flood coming in from the far east, they are losing the battle. They are the people who you should be complaining to.

Class 4 l@sers are the ultra high power ones used for cutting metal and professional lighting displays. You need a lot of training before you will even be sold one of these.

The main hazard to pilots from nighttime l@sers is distraction and temporary blindness. It is basically impossible to cause permanent damage from the ground, with anything you can buy over the counter (legal or illegal). It's the temporary blindness that is the major hazard to navigation, and why the sales of illegally high powered l@ser pointers should be better policed.

S
theothersimon is offline   Reply
Old 19th Aug 2008, 10:48   #39 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Wellington,NZ
Age: 57
Posts: 1,469
They're also fairly extensively used in the building industry, for lining up things that matter. Floor joists, when re-piling, for instance.
These ones are probably a bit more powerful than the ones used by lecturers, at a guess.
Tarq57 is offline   Reply
Old 19th Aug 2008, 11:34   #40 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Asia
Posts: 182
Quote:
The main hazard to pilots from nighttime l@sers is distraction and temporary blindness. It is basically impossible to cause permanent damage from the ground, with anything you can buy over the counter (legal or illegal). It's the temporary blindness that is the major hazard to navigation, and why the sales of illegally high powered l@ser pointers should be better policed.
Impossible? That's quite a Titanic statement you just made: "basically impossible." Did you consider the post USSR proliferation of overseas green surplus military l@sers? When a crewmember is incapacitated with blindness sounds to me like much more than distraction or temporary blindness. How long is temporary? Here is all I could find on Wiki:

Quote:
Even the first l@ser was recognized as being potentially dangerous. Theodore Maiman characterized the first l@ser as having a power of one "Gillette"; as it could burn through one Gillette razor blade. Today, it is accepted that even low-power l@sers with only a few milliwatts of output power can be hazardous to human eyesight, when the beam from such a l@ser hits the eye directly or after reflection from a shiny surface. At wavelengths which the cornea and the lens can focus well, the coherence and low divergence of l@ser light means that it can be focused by the eye into an extremely small spot on the retina, resulting in localized burning and permanent damage in seconds or even less time.
l@sers are usually labeled with a safety class number, which identifies how dangerous the l@ser is:
Class I/1 is inherently safe, usually because the light is contained in an enclosure, for example in cd players.
Class II/2 is safe during normal use; the blink reflex of the eye will prevent damage. Usually up to 1 mW power, for example l@ser pointers.
Class IIIa/3R l@sers are usually up to 5 mW and involve a small risk of eye damage within the time of the blink reflex. Staring into such a beam for several seconds is likely to cause (minor) eye damage.
Class IIIb/3B can cause immediate severe eye damage upon exposure. Usually l@sers up to 500 mW, such as those in cd and dvd burners.
Class IV/4 l@sers can burn skin, and in some cases, even scattered light can cause eye and/or skin damage. Many industrial and scientific l@sers are in this class.
The indicated powers are for visible-light, continuous-wave l@sers. For pulsed l@sers and invisible wavelengths, other power limits apply. People working with class 3B and class 4 l@sers can protect their eyes with safety goggles which are designed to absorb light of a particular wavelength.
Certain infrared l@sers with wavelengths beyond about 1.4 micrometres are often referred to as being "eye-safe". This is because the intrinsic molecular vibrations of water molecules very strongly absorb light in this part of the spectrum, and thus a l@ser beam at these wavelengths is attenuated so completely as it passes through the eye's cornea that no light remains to be focused by the lens onto the retina. The label "eye-safe" can be misleading, however, as it only applies to relatively low power continuous wave beams and any high power or Q-switched l@ser at these wavelengths can burn the cornea, causing severe eye damage.
[edit]
I say ban em' all; and go back to chalk lines and wooden pointer sticks.....
pacplyer is offline   Reply
Reply
 
 
 


Thread Tools


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT. The time now is 14:12.


vBulletin® v3.8.7, Copyright ©2000-2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
SEO by vBSEO 3.6.1
© 1996-2012 The Professional Pilots Rumour Network