PPRuNe Forums

Go Back   PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Rumours & News
Forgotten your Username/Password?
PPRuNe Email Register FAQ Calendar Advertise Mark Forums Read

Rumours & News Reporting Points that may affect our jobs or lives as professional pilots. Also, items that may be of interest to professional pilots.


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 31st July 2008, 17:22   #1 (permalink)
wasaspacecadet
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: UK
Posts: 18
EZY flight off due to 'expired licence'

As humble SLF, I add no comment, but found this and thought it of interest.

easyJet flight cancelled after pilot's licence expires - Telegraph

Spacey

wasaspacecadet is offline  
Reply
Old 31st July 2008, 18:30   #2 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Nottingham, UK
Posts: 1,675
It's to easy (sorry about the pun) to just say the pilot "had forgotten to renew his licence". This is a joint responsibility between the pilot and the company. All the companies I know of issue timely reminders but this sounds like an error in administration.

Also are Easy that short of standby cover that the flight had to be cancelled?
fireflybob is offline   Reply
Old 31st July 2008, 18:34   #3 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 681
It happens every now and again (alsoe with medicals, LCPs etc).

Imagine if it was the other way round - 'Exclusive: Airline pilot with expired licence flies holiday jet. Narrowly misses school*. Full story pages 3,4,5,8,10,11.'






[* 'Narrowly misses school' is obligatory in any aviation news story]
A Very Civil Pilot is offline   Reply
Old 31st July 2008, 20:25   #4 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 132
Fireflybob,

It is not a 'joint responsibility' to maintain licence validity, this responsibility lies with the licence holder alone. Any decent company however will have a system in place to remind the individual that a certain element of his licence is due for renewal as it is obviously in their interest to make sure that the employee remains employable at all times. Nonetheless if you hold a licence it is up to you and you alone to ensure that it remains valid.
Smudger is offline   Reply
Old 31st July 2008, 20:57   #5 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Gomersal & The Airports.
Posts: 767
The Telegraph 'licenced' to print 'Rubbish'

Do we know for sure if there is (any) evidence of truth about the licence??
BYALPHAINDIA is offline   Reply
Old 31st July 2008, 21:23   #6 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Where its at
Posts: 213
EZY flight off due to 'expired licence'

I agree with FFB. As a result of the expired licence, although for all the difference it makes it might as well have been through sickness, there was a lack of crew to fly the sector. That's the responsibility of the company non?

Never mind, I can see a special dispensation coming soon to a part A near you...
Caudillo is offline   Reply
Old 31st July 2008, 21:36   #7 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: England
Posts: 84
Sounds a little odd: surely they would have standby, and if short of crew just use the next crew and back fill ?

Last edited by muppet : 1st August 2008 at 10:33.
muppet is offline   Reply
Old 31st July 2008, 22:23   #8 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Nottingham, UK
Posts: 1,675
Quote:
Fireflybob,

It is not a 'joint responsibility' to maintain licence validity, this responsibility lies with the licence holder alone. Any decent company however will have a system in place to remind the individual that a certain element of his licence is due for renewal as it is obviously in their interest to make sure that the employee remains employable at all times. Nonetheless if you hold a licence it is up to you and you alone to ensure that it remains valid.
Smudger, yes from a legal standpoint I am aware of this and I agree with you but I believe there is also an onus on the operator to ensure their crews are operating legally.

Slightly off thread but several years ago a couple of pilots for a UK airline exceeded 100 hours in 28 days. Both the pilots AND the operator were (successfully) taken to court by the Authority.

If a pilot is flying with an invalid licence I still think the operator has some accountability.
fireflybob is offline   Reply
Old 1st August 2008, 00:39   #9 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Kent, UK
Posts: 291
Quote:
It is not a 'joint responsibility' to maintain licence validity, this responsibility lies with the licence holder alone.
Whilst there is a personal responsibility on the part of the licence holder to make sure they are valid I think there is a joint legal responsibility and this has been written into the Part A for both companies I've worked for no doubt sourced from EU-OPS:
EU-OPS 1.940
(a) An operator shall ensure that:
(3) All flight crew members hold an applicable and valid licence acceptable to the Authority and are suitably qualified
and competent to conduct the duties assigned to them;
StudentInDebt is offline   Reply
Old 1st August 2008, 01:06   #10 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 132
OK chaps I'll look into it if I get the time but I'm certain that you can't blame your company if you are ramp checked and grounded because your licence has lapsed. (Moral;- keep your licence valid!).
Smudger is offline   Reply
Old 1st August 2008, 07:18   #11 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: uk
Posts: 249
Quote:
OK chaps I'll look into it if
Smudger, why not just thank StudentInDebt for the reference he has given??

Not really much to 'look into'!
kick the tires is offline   Reply
Old 1st August 2008, 13:04   #12 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Aug 1998
Location: London, UK
Posts: 609
The story says "200 passengers". According to Airbus the 321 can seat up to 199 pax. Do easy cram in more?

Also if it was an ex-GB 321 there may not be all that many crews cleared on it (if some GB crews jumped ship before the merger). You can't just take someone of a standard easy 319 and stick them in a 321 just like that.
Groundloop is offline   Reply
Old 1st August 2008, 13:08   #13 (permalink)
Plumbum Pendular
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: Avionics Bay
Age: 39
Posts: 688
I used fly A321s with 220 PAX seats.
fmgc is offline   Reply
Old 1st August 2008, 13:55   #14 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Aug 1998
Location: Ex-pat Aussie in the UK
Posts: 809
Having just had to renew my JAR licence myself, it should be pointed out that this a stupid requirement!

My Australian ATPL is permanent (i.e. never has to be renewed), and the validity is simply based on a valid medical, and a passed check within the last year. Paying a load of cash to the UK CAA, just for someone to press the "print" button on the computer to renew a licence for another five years is a complete waste of time and money.
Checkboard is offline   Reply
Old 1st August 2008, 15:12   #15 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: USA
Posts: 162
Apparantly plenty of flight crew looking for o/t that day, however ezy decided to canx service, which really cheered up the returning pax (There's your £89 Sir, enjoy your extended stay on the island! Any complaints please contact easyjet.com).
Lauderdale is offline   Reply
Old 1st August 2008, 18:28   #16 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: uk
Posts: 249
Lauderdale says:

Quote:
Apparantly plenty of flight crew looking for o/t that day
Shows what a lack of credibility your posts have - there is no such agreement nor system at easyJet.

Dont believe all you hear and we wont believe all you post! Deal?
kick the tires is offline   Reply
Old 1st August 2008, 21:17   #17 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Zummerset
Posts: 103
To add to the debate, it most certainly IS the responsibility of the pilot to maintain his own licence. In my company, we all had to renew our ATPL's last year as we were issued with JAA licences from a company bulk application five years previously. This time it was our responsibilty and it was made perfectly clear that we had to make a timely application. The company were aware of our expiry dates and we were issued with several written reminders enclosing CAA application forms and even a text message reminder to the company mobile. Really no excuse to get it wrong!
Stop Stop Stop is offline   Reply
Old 1st August 2008, 22:39   #18 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 132
Thank you Student. Kick - happy now? Stop - thank you.
Smudger is offline   Reply
Old 1st August 2008, 22:44   #19 (permalink)
er82
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: uk
Posts: 386
Kick
Before you get all sarcastic with others, check YOUR facts....Deal?!

The 321 is crewed by ex-GB crew. We DO have an overtime agreement, and actually the moment rosters were published were given a list of about 40flights for august that needed covering with overtime.

er82 is offline  
Reply
Old 2nd August 2008, 09:26   #20 (permalink)
point8six
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: cloud 9
Posts: 162
CHECKBOARD - suggest you never apply for a CAA Singapore licence, which until recently required renewing every 6 months. It is now every year!

point8six is offline  
Reply
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes


Posting Rules
vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
JAR Licence - JAR FI req for Flight review? Biggles66 Flying Instructors & Examiners 7 19th October 2008 10:34
Indian Flight Dispatch Licence p_natasha South Asia and the Far East 1 15th December 2007 07:40
JAA Licence expired joehunt Questions 1 17th August 2006 20:06
Licence validation for flying in the US.. expired medical? ChocksAwayUK Professional Pilot Training (includes ground studies) 9 6th March 2005 20:19
JAA Flight engineer licence M.85 Professional Pilot Training (includes ground studies) 3 18th December 2003 21:08


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:16.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC7
© 1996-2008 The Professional Pilots Rumour Network

As these are anonymous forums the origins of the contributions may be opposite to what may be apparent. In fact the press may use it, or the unscrupulous, or sciolists*, to elicit certain reactions.

*"sciolist"... Noun, archaic. "a person who pretends to be knowledgeable and well informed".